Wednesday, February 28, 2018
Mondoweiss: The Never-Ending Crisis of Zionism by Philip Weiss
There are so many things wrong with the above article, I don’t know where to start.
Now, kudos to Philip Weiss’ sympathy for Palestinians. In US politics, Sympathy for Palestinians is virtually forbidden. No mainstream politician dares to express any sympathy for the plight of a people who are now in their 50th year of Occupation(and never mind Nakba, the mass campaign of pogroms that wiped Palestine off the map to make way for the creation of Israel). Virtually all US politicians(at federal, state, and local level) are into Israel First, Israel First, Israel First. Same goes for the mainstream 'right-wing' media and mainstream 'left-wing' media. They never utter the term Nakba, and most Americans never heard of it even though the US played the most instrumental role in the mass pogroms against Palestinians.
Though Weiss is often right in his diagnosis of symptoms, his proposed cure will only make compound the problem. (It's like Marx was a better appraiser of modern economics than its solver.) Indeed, Weiss' proposed solutions are not unlike the mindsets and fateful decisions that led to the current mess. Weiss fails to understand that he's a universalist-imperialist who, in condemning nationalism, unwittingly serves as yet another puppet of globalist-imperialist open-borders. He fails to realize and acknowledge that violation of nationalism has been the true curse of the 20th century.
The current mess with Palestinians began with and under imperialism. Much of the Middle East failed to develop into a viable political entities under the Ottoman Empire. And then, the British Empire allowed Zionists to ‘immigrate’ into Palestine and gradually, the dramatically, take over from Arabs. That was the origins of the disaster. It was made possible by imperialist suppression of local autonomy and independence. And of course, Israel is now backed by the US, itself no longer a sovereign national entity but a war-mongering(culturally or militarily) hegemon that invades other nations financially & militarily and is, in turn, invaded by other nations demographically.
Weiss says the current plight of Palestinians is like what Jews suffered 100 yrs ago, but that’s a complete misconception.
For one thing, Palestinians are in their own lands, from which they’ve been evicted or on which they are occupied. Jews in Europe, in contrast, were living in other people’s lands. The violent reactions against Jews in Europe were, in some respects, like Palestinian intifada against Zionists. This was made all the worse due to imperialism. After all, why did the worst outbreaks against Jews happen in Imperial Nations? Because so many ethnic groups felt occupied under Imperialist rule and came to regard Jews as collaborator agents of the empire. Any non-Austrian gentile who resented Austrian rule came to distrust Jews as the agents and middlemen serving the empire. Or, it could be the other way around. The ruling ethnic group could come to regard Jews as radical agitators riling up the other groups against the imperial status quo.
Despite certain degree of ambivalence and even hostility toward Jews, sovereign nation-states, in general, treated Jews much better: UK, France, Netherlands, Italy, Sweden, and etc. France was known for ‘notorious antisemitism’, but it didn’t have regular outbreaks of pogroms like in Eastern Europe where aspiring nationalism were suppressed by the empire, be it Germanic or Slavic. Granted, sometimes, Jews found the Imperial Order to their benefit. Diversity, as in Austro-Hungarian Empire, made it near-impossible for all gentiles to unite against Jews, as later were to happen in National Socialist Germany. The various gentile groups were too busy squabbling with each other to unite their forces against the Jews. But on the other hand, because so many groups felt so disenfranchised, occupied, and denied national sovereignty, they grew ever more bitter and came to scapegoat Jews as the source of problems. Imperialist Diversity weakens national unity among goyim, but it also intensifies their rage and bitterness, and that can provide dry wood for massive conflagration. And even though National Socialism was a severe case of nationalist antisemitism, the origins of Hitler’s rage were imperial(and he became most dangerous to Jews when he pivoted from German nationalism to German Imperialism). He grew up in the Austro-Hungarian Empire where ethnic tensions were intensifying due to Slavic and other hostilities. If he’d grown up in a secure Germanic nation, he might have regarded Jews as just a minority that should be tolerated. But he got radicalized in the Austro-Hungarian Empire where politics was hostile along ethnic lines because non-Austrians felt oppressed by Austro-Hungarian elite power. And since this bitterness was directed at ALL Austrians, even an ordinary civilian like Hitler could become ultra-ethnic in hostility. And WWI was the result of clash of empires, not of nations. Germans put pan-Germanicism above all else, and Russia pandered to Pan-Slavicism. And UK joined with France and Russia because it saw the rise of Germany as a threat to British Imperial Hegemony.
Hitler had a chance of making National Socialism work, but because he grew up under Imperial Mentality, his ambitions spilled across German borders and targeted Czech nation, then Poland, and then even USSR. That was his undoing. He wasn’t satisfied with German Nationalism. National Socialism turned into Imperial Racial Socialism for the ‘Aryans’.
But Jewish reaction to antisemitism also made the problem worse. It was right for powerful and influential Jews to do SOMETHING to help out their less fortunate brethren around the world. But what did Jacob Schiff’s support of ‘Russian’ Revolution lead to? A totalitarian terror state where millions of people were sent to Gulag and where 100,000s were summarily executed by secret police. Pogroms were terrible, but the casualties were in the thousands. In contrast, the Soviet Revolution, disproportionately led by Jews, killed millions and destroyed tens of thousands of churches. It even killed every member of Tsar’s family, kids included. This blooy radical behavior on the part of Jews led many European conservatives to side with Fascists and National Socialists as the lesser to two evils. And prior to WWII, that would have been the sane assessment because most of the mass horrors til then had been carried out by communists, many of whom were Jewish.
"The most brilliant Jew in the world, Franz Kafka came out of his office in Prague to see Jews being beaten and he went to Zionist meetings."
Here, Weiss sort of hints at how today’s problems are rooted in past reactions. Kafka obviously wasn’t the only Jew who reacted to events by showing interest in Zionism. Zionism was a strange hybrid. It was a reaction against both Imperialism and Nationalism. In some ways, Jews were jumping on the Nationalist Bandwagon. With each ethnic group demanding their own nation-state and sovereignty — further emboldened by Woodrow Wilson’s idea of national self-determination following WWI — , Jews figured they should demand their own nation too. But there was one problem. While Czechs, Slovaks, Serbs, Croatians, Poles, and etc could look at the soil beneath their feet and claim it as their ancestral homeland, Jews could make no such claim in Europe. So, they had to look elsewhere, and the most significant piece of real estate was the Holy Land from which the Jewish people and culture originated.
But even as Jews caught the spirit of gentile groups calling for their own homelands, they were also reacting against gentile nationalism. Had the Imperial system continued, Jews could have carried on as a nomadic or mercurial group serving as middlemen among various folks. But with the rise of nationalism, such ambiguous identity was becoming untenable. Gentile national identities could become hostile to Jewishness, and even this hostility had a duality. It loathed Jews as a stubborn ancient identity that refused to assimilate with gentiles and convert to Christianity, but it also loathed Jews as a mercurial hyper-modern zelig-like chameleons who could adapt to any place and time.
Anyway, because European Jews couldn’t claim any land in Europe as their own, they couldn’t just oppose imperialism. If Poles wanted Poland, all they had to do was oppose Russian and German imperialism. Once Russians and Germans were gone from Poland, it was Poland for the Polish.
In contrast, even with the fall of empires, Jews were still without a nation of their own in Europe. They had to claim their homeland elsewhere, and it turned out to be the Holy Land. And since Palestine was dominated by non-Jews, Jews needed the support of Imperialism to gain access to the land. Jews had trickled in during Ottoman times, but it was under British Imperialist rule that Jews began to enter in much bigger numbers. Jews were looking to create a nationalist state but with the help of imperialism. Thus, Israel was created in the most paradoxical manner. It was to establish Jewish national sovereignty, but it could only be done by using an imperialist power to deny national sovereignty to the natives.
This was all the more complicated because European Jews were both the most powerful and the least powerful people. They were least powerful because they were minorities in all territories and had no land to claim as their own. Serbs and Slovaks were far less successful than Jews financially and culturally, but they still could claim the soil under their feet as their homeland. They were rooted whereas Jews were rootless. This rootless was a huge disadvantage to Jews, but it was also why they’d grown so powerful. Unable to stake their wealth on rootedness to soil, Jewish wealth developed via networks. It was ‘cloud-wealth’, like Google offers cloud-computing. So, even if Jews got kicked out of a certain nation, they might still have wealth stored in international networks. Even if they lost their homes and personal properties, their bank accounts could be forwarded to London or Paris. In contrast, if a ‘dumb Polack’ lost his home and property, he really had nothing left. Jews had Cloud Wealth wheres gentile simpletons had Earth Wealth. To be sure, not all Jews had Cloud Wealth, and many in Eastern Europe were dirt-poor. But because the Jewish Network existed, even the poorer Eastern European cousins soon learned to take advantage of it.
This duality of Jews as the most powerful people(with financial stake in just about every European nation and kingdom) and least powerful people(as a folks without homeland) made things all the more complicated in relation to Zionism. On the one hand, it was weak Jews pleading for a homeland of their own. They were unfortunate unlike other European folks who could claim the land under their feet as theirs.
On the other hand, it was a case of powerful Jews manipulating and bribing the Great European Empires to do their bidding… like what God did for the Hebrews in their departure from Egypt. Open up the seas and let Jews enter the Promised Land. It was a replay of Exodus — and even called such by Leon Uris the novelist — because the ancient story itself is paradoxical. On the one hand, Hebrews are a weak people in flight from the powerful Egyptian Military. On the other hand, Jews have all-powerful God on their side, and the Egyptians have no chance.
Anyway, if Weiss’ point is that today’s Jews must act on behalf of Palestinians like past Jews did for Jews-suffering-pogroms in Eastern Europe, he should think again because those efforts 100 yrs ago backfired horribly. It led to the rise of communism and death of millions, and then the counter-reaction of rise of National Socialism that led to WWII. Looking back, Jews should have been more sober in their assessments and courses of action. Jews overreacted and falsely blamed the Russian Tsar for the pogroms. This led to worldwide Jewish support for communism, the horror unleashed by which was many times worse than pogroms. And didn’t Zionism(yet another scheme to help suffering Jews), which eventually reclaimed the Holy Land by humiliating Arabs and Muslims, lead to the current state of affairs? If Jews really wanted a land of their own, rich and powerful Jews should have pooled their resources together to buy some land in some empty part of the world. A land the size of Israel in Australia, Canada, or some other part willing to bargain with Judea. With the power of the Rothchilds in the UK, I’m sure something along those lines could have been arranged. But Jews wanted the Holy Land. And this entailed war and ethnic cleansing. Worse, it led to occupation and Zionist imperialism on Muslim nations. Zionist nationalists asked for the white horse than took the cuddly pig. It’s like the scene in VIVA ZAPATA where Brando’s character offers a Mex kid a piglet but the kid insists on Zapata's great white horse.
Jews could have asked for a nation in some inhabited part of the world, and then it would have been a peaceful piggy-wiggy nation. But they wanted the War Horse of the Holy Land, and they’ve been riding that horse and trampling all over international norms.
That said, what is done is done and can’t be reversed. Israel is here to stay. Still, Jews failed to do it right. Jews could have done two things. Call for peaceful co-existence with Arabs, but then this would have entailed NO MORE JEWISH IMMIGRATION. Arabs could have accepted a Jewish-Arab-inhabited Holy Land IF Jews would agree to end of immigration. But Jews wanted endless Right of Return to all Jews around the world to Palestine, and that was something Arabs could not accept.
So, the inevitable result was war. But Jews didn’t do this right. If a people are going to ethnically cleanse a people, they need to go all out. Kick them all out, like what Andrew Jackson did with the Indians. Instead, Jews expelled most but kept enough to cause lots of trouble. The Rule of History is, “If you are gonna do it(even if morally dubious), do it ‘right’ and go all the way, but if you feel it’s wrong or not worth doing, don’t do it at all.” It’s like US military involvement since end of WWII. It’s been confused, with US getting embroiled in a serious way but not enough to really finish the job. Look at the mess in Iraq. And before that, it was Vietnam. Kennedy was wise about Cuba. Once he decided against intervention following Bay of Pigs, he stuck to his guns and let Cuba be. It’s like Chechnya. Russians had two choices: Just let it go OR go in big and utterly crush the rebellion. Neither would have been ideal, politically or morally, but there are times in history when half-heartedness leads to more and bigger problems.
At any rate, if the purpose of Zionism was Jewish nationalism, Jews shot themselves in the foot by letting too many Arabs remain in Israel and then occupying West Bank. The ONLY sensible rationale for Israel’s conquest of West Bank in 1967 would have been to push the remaining Arabs in Israel into it. Instead, Jews colonized the land, and now Jews got Diversity Hell in both Israel and West Bank. Diversity leads to trouble.
"Peace Now urges separation: 'the occupation corrodes Israel and its image, and will continue until Israel extricates itself from the Palestinians.' Jewish separation from Palestinians is a delusion. It is like whites separating from blacks in the U.S. Israel is 20 percent non-Jewish; and it rules territories containing 5 million Palestinians; and though the world has resolved to 'extricate' the Jews from the Arabs for 70 years now, the communities are intertwined more than ever, as Israeli Jews flood the West Bank and build more and more Jewish-only colonies."
If separation is a delusion, how were Jews able to carry out Nakba in 1948 when Jews were the minority and far less powerful than they are today? The real delusion is that Peace can be arrived via Diversity. Weiss has a good heart about Palestinians but he’s being naive. Justifiably or not, Arabs are PISSED. If Jews were to go for one-state-solution and allow Arabs equal rights, it will be the end for Israel. Palestinians who outnumber Jews in West Bank will rise up and commit horrible acts of violence once Apartheid regimen is lifted. And if Arabs have equal rights in Israel, then it will mean Arabs should be allowed to immigrate to Israel as well. The Right of Return for Palestinian Diaspora will spell doom for Israel as a Jewish state.
If you want lasting peace, Peace Now is somewhat correct. Its only problem is it doesn’t go far enough. All Arabs in Israel should be pushed to West Bank and all Jews in West Bank should be repatriated to Israel. It may be politically impossible, but such is the ONLY lasting solution. It’s like the only sensible solution for South Africa was separation. Let whites be HERE and let blacks be THERE. Instead, the 'rainbow nation' turned into bloody nation. Palestinians have a right to be spitting mad at the Jews, and for that reason, any notion of long-lasting peace under Diversity is a delusion. Weiss’ is being willfully naive and hopeful to stoke his ego as the Good Jew denouncing Bad Jews. There can be no ‘good Jews’ or ‘bad Jews’ in the current situation. It’s between sensible Jews and delusional Jews, and Weiss is also delusional.
Weiss mentions blacks in America and says it’s delusional to call for separation between whites and blacks. Weiss may be right about that: Whites may be stuck with blacks. But then, how did this become the case? Because of Diversity created by Imperialism. The US could be black-free IF whites had not practiced the Atlantic Slave Trade under the auspices of European imperialism. (Granted, later British imperialism did some good things by banning the slave trade of the Spanish empire.)
Anyway, the biggest problem of the US — the ghastly blacks — is the result of imperialism.
Diversity complicates matters, usually negatively, down the road if not here-and-now.
Whites understood this about Indians, which is why Indians were expelled as whites expanded territories. Whites knew it’d be problematic to integrate with red savages getting drunk, scalping skulls, and hurling tomahawks. Also, Indians had a legit claim to this land since their forefathers had hunted bison and gophers on it. So, for there to be peace, whites had to drive out the Indians and create a white nation. Even Emma Lazarus understood this, which is why she supported Manifest Destiny. She wanted more whites and Jews to come to America and turn red savages into wretched huddled refuse in Reservations. “Better you than me.”
But if whites got rid of white-red diversity, they recklessly increased white-black diversity? Why? Because if whites confronted reds as warrior savages wielding tomahawks, whites brought blacks as slaves in chains. So, whites figured they’d always have power over the Negroids. With blacks, it was white masters ruling over black slaves or servants. But whites didn’t consider the future where blacks might be freed and then use their stronger muscles and bigger dongs to destroy white manhood and colonize white wombs. It goes to show Diversity ends in disaster one way or the other.
Anyway, even if Weiss is correct that Jews in Israel and whites in the US must make do with Diversity since we can’t turn back the clock, he(and others like him) is still foolish because he wants to INCREASE Diversity.
It’s one thing to argue that some nations became diverse due to certain accidents or events in history, and therefore, people in such nations must try to make the best of it. Okay, fair enough.
But why should any nation willfully INCREASE DIVERSITY when history shows time and time again that such conditions lead to more tensions, more divisions, more distrust, more corruption, more hostilities, more confusion, and etc?
After all, look at the US and EU. It’s not about ‘racism’ vs ‘anti-racism’ but about Paleo-racism vs Neo-racism. Conservatives are Paleo-racists who want white nations and white-majority nations to emphasize white identity, heritage, and power. Progressive Neo-racists, contrary to being for racial equality, are for the supremacism of Jews and blacks over other races and for whites to be attacked and blamed for everything. Look at the phenom of ACOWW or Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs being pushed by PC. It’s not about racial equality. It means that white women should reject white males as pathetic dorky cucks and surrender their wombs to the superior dongs and seeds of Negroids. Why does BBC series on the Fall of Troy feature Zeus and Achilles as blacks? Why are Christmas commercials showing white women going with Negroids? It’s not about racial equality but about how white women should go with black men as superior to white males. PC is just neo-racism with new configuration of superior races and inferior races.
Most people are either Paleo-racists or Neo-racists. Only a few are Tru-racists or Race-ists. The thing about Paleo-Racists and Neo-Racists is they deny their own racial biases and accuse OTHERS of ‘racism’ whereas Tru-Racists or Race-ists admit that everyone is consciously or subconsciously race-ist since it’s impossible not to see race and racial differences and their effects on society.
Even Weissism is a form of Neo-Racism because even if Weissism were to be implemented 100% in Israel-West-Bank, the result will be Jewish domination. Why? DNA. Ashkenazi Jews are much smarter than Arabs or People of Sand. Just consider. The US has tons of smart and capable Anglos and Germanics. But Jews beat them all. So, how are the Arab Sand People supposed to compete with Jews? Even if Israel were totally meritocratic and treated everyone in colorblind manner, Jews will totally dominate. It’s like blacks totally dominate sports cuz genetics in sports biologically discriminates against slower/weaker races. Israel would just go from Paleo-Racism that officially favors Jews over Palestinians to Neo-Racism where biology favors Jews over Palestinians.
For Palestinians to live in a nation of Arab dominance, it can’t have lots of smarter Jews. In a Weissian future Israel, the ONLY hope for Arabs would be the power of numbers and demography. Currently, Israel bans Muslim immigration, welcomes Jewish immigration, and pays special money to horny rabbinical students to have lots of babies. But under Weissism, there can’t be special Jewish privileges on immigration. And special money for Jewish breeders would go against the spirit of equal treatment under law. I mean, if horny Jewish rabbinical students should be funded to breed, why not for horny Islamic students?
In the end, Weissism is hardly different from Neo-conservatism. Weiss is a globalist-imperialist who ridicules national identities, national sovereignty, and national borders. He is for Europe being flooded by masses of Africans and Muslims, oblivious to the fact that the fate of Europeans will be like that of Palestinians who were flooded and destroyed by Jewish mass immigration.
Where Weissism is different from Neo-conservatism and most forms of Liberal Zionism is that he calls for the destruction of ALL nations, Israel included. I must admit there’s a refreshing aspect to such moral consistency in contrast to Neocons and Liberal Zionists who denounce identity and nationalism among goyim(in the name of spreading ‘liberal values’) but demand that goyim serve and support Israel as a Jewish state.
While moral consistency is better than moral hypocrisy, the core of Weissism is globalism, and that means no national rights, no national security, no national sovereignty for any people. Weiss seems to think that his values will lead to some Lennonite Imagined World, but it will have the opposite effect. It will turn all the world into the hellhole that is West Bank and Gaza.
Utopianism is imperialism of the mind. It is over-ambitious and deluded. What is real and realistic are peoples, cultures, heritages, and national borders. We need more of that.
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
The reason why Western Globalists side with ‘migrants’ on some instinctive level is due to European Imperialist Legacy. European ‘migrant’ colonists arrived on other lands and gradually and then dramatically took over. It’s like the Pilgrims first arrived as ‘refugees’. And British convicts arrived as migrants in Australia and took over.
Newspapers like the Guardian are left-imperialist. They believe any people have the Human RIGHT to barge into other lands and colonize them. It is a retro-justification for European imperialism, just like Diversity Cult justifies past imperialism that forced Diversity on the world.
Using Guardian Left-Imperialist Logic, No people have a right to defend and preserve their nation and culture. All nations must be Tibetanized or Hawaiianized, i.e. invaded and transformed by migrant colonists. (But Israel gets Pass-Over privileges.)
Globalism is Left-Imperialism.
Australia passes ‘gay marriage’ and welcomes Muslims.
UK celebrates Jungle(African sexual-savagery) and invites Jihad(of Muslims).
Diver-psychosis results in strange symptoms.
The conversion-consumption mentality has come to define every aspect of Americanism and the West.
A missionary is bored with existing Christians. His excitement and joy derive from converting heathens into New Christians. So, he seeks out yet more heathens to convert. He gets his thrills that way. Already-Christians are boring. The glory comes with saving new souls for Christ. It’s like a hunter is bored with trophies on the wall. He wants to kill new animals. A fisherman is bored with caught fish. He wants the excitement of catching new fish.
Same goes for shopping and collecting. A woman is bored with clothes and shoes in the closet. The joy comes from buying New shoes and clothes. The new stuff could be no better or even worse than the stuff she already has, but there is excitement in newness itself.
And book collectors keep getting new books even though old ones go unread because of the excitement of getting new stuff. And people want to travel to new places to feel the thrill again.
So, America is more excited about New Americans. America has to shop for New Americans. Old Ones are boring. America must convert non-Americans into Saved People by becoming New Americans. Turning immigrants into 'Americans' comes with missionary zeal.
And Europe is excited about New Europeans. Merkel is like a fisherman dragging in a giant net that overflows with tons of new fish(even though it's mostly leeches).
So, even illegals are ‘dreamers’ for 'progressives' caught up in the missionary zeal of 'converting' non-Americans into New Americans and saving their bodies(since we no longer believe in souls) with consumerism. And the future is always seen as more hopeful than the past or the now. As Scarlett said, “Tomorrow will be another day.” And Annie sang about Tomorrow. America is to be Tomorrowland.
But as the retro-nostalgia of TOMORROWLAND showed, there can be no tomorrow without yesterday. And BACK TO THE FUTURE shows future owes to the past. And the Renaissance was about advancing into the future by regaining lost knowledge, culture, and glory.
Progs are into missionary zeal. They are about converting others into New Americans or New Europeans.
Conservatives are more into the born-again mentality. It’s about rediscovering the truth within you and drawing excitement from such realization via re-connection. To be born-again means to realize what’s inside that has been ignored or forgotten.
Hilary was into converting the world. She is missionary-istic.
Trump’s MAGA message is Americans must be born-again and find glory in the Americanism they'd forgotten. It is 'baptivistic', to be born again, to become who you are.
Monday, February 26, 2018
If Twitter Is Really Serious about Banning Violent Groups, It Should Begin with Zionists and the Deep State
Jewish-run media outlet Daily Beast lies, but then, what else is new?
Jews at Daily Beast gloat ‘Twitter bans white supremacists’(especially Jared Taylor), but in fact, what’s happening is Jewish Supremacists of ADL are pressuring Twitter to ban White National Liberationists who refuse to serve as White Submissivists at the feet of Neocon Zionist overlords.
Daily Beast says ‘white supremacists flee to safe space(of Gab)’, but in fact, they were forced out, just like Palestinians were forced out of Palestine(soon to become Israel). They didn’t voluntarily flee, just like Palestinians didn’t voluntarily flee to Jordan and West Bank; they were pushed into those areas by Zionist pogroms and acts of terror.
White National Liberationists were more than willing and more than happy to stay on Twitter and trade ideas and engage in discussions with friends and foes alike. It is the Jewish Zionist Supremacists who demanded that Twitter be a Safe Space for Zionists and their globalist agenda. No one fled to Gab. They were forced out of Twitter and signed up at Gab, just like Palestinians who were expelled from Palestine(changed by Zionists into Israel) found refuge in West Bank or Jordan.
Also, Gab is NOT a safe space. It is not a platform that only allows one kind of views and protects them from other points of views. It is OPEN TO ANYONE who appreciates true free speech. It’s for people with courage and thick skin to be confronted by others with contrary viewpoints. Gab does have white supremacist types, but they don’t get to force Gab to purge people they don’t like. In contrast, Jewish supremacists get to force Twitter to purge enemies of Jewish Supremacism. This is why Twitter not only banned Jared Taylor but suppresses BDS and Palestinian voices. 2018 is the 70th anniversary of Nakba, but try getting the hashtag #Nakba70 on Twitter. As Twitter takes orders from ADL, much of pro-Palestinian voices are suppressed, banned, or shadow-banned. Twitter calls itself ‘progressive’, but if it really cares for the little guy and the underdog, why does it work with ADL and Zionists than with BDS and Palestinians? Surely, anyone with even a modicum of knowledge about world affairs knows that Palestinians are the ones being crushed and destroyed by Zionist imperialists. Twitter is what it is because it’s run by globalist elites and because it wants more money from Jewish investors.
Anyway, Twitter is now one big safe space for Jewish Supremacists who push wars and imperialism all over the world.. If Twitter really wants to ban Hate, it should purge all the Zionists and Neocons. Isn’t it funny that Twitter releases a statement that it will not tolerate anyone affiliated with violent groups but gives free reign to some of the most violent, destructive, supremacist, and imperialist forces on Earth?
If Twitter is truly sincere about banning violent voices and figures on its platform, I have some sound advice. They are as follows:
1. Twitter must purge the Zionist Neocons. Theirs is an ultra-violent agenda that hates & oppresses Palestinians, wages Wars for Israel, and aids terrorists to destroy secular/modern Muslim nations. Neocon-Imperialism under George W. Bush and Obama has killed a million Muslim lives and forced millions more into refugee status. Obama and Hillary’s support of proxy terrorists in Libya and Syria have turned entire cities into disaster areas and led to the ruins of many ancient treasures.
2. Twitter must purge those connected to the Pentagon & US military complex. This ugly beast is supremacist with jingoist talk of ‘American exceptionalism’, implying the US has some divine right to invade any nation & meddle in world affairs. It is a hateful, contemptuous, and murderous attitude. .
In contrast, the brave Alt Right has denounced US imperialism and taken an anti-war stance. This is the real reason why Jewish Supremacists hate the Alt Right. Alt Right’s call for universal nationalism and sovereignty for all nations undermines the project of US hegemony all around the world. National Sovereignty Matters. The US has no right to play police of the world and club any nation that won’t submit to the Dollar supremacism and Homomania of the US.
Unlike the MSM that’s nothing but a Deep State propaganda tool, the Alt Right denounces Trump when he acts like an imperialist and threatens other nations. In contrast, Jewish globalists, Deep State, and MSM(totally controlled by Jewish supremacists) support Trump only when he spouts jingoist nonsense against Russia, Iran, and whatever nation that Jews(and Israel) happen to hate at the moment. If anything, Jews fear Trump will improve relations with Russia. According to the logic of Jewish supremacism, If Jews hate Russia, all Americans must hate Russia. American passions are just cattle to be steered by Jewish likes and dislikes. By spreading lies about Russia-hacking, Jews have poisoned the minds of countless Americans(who’d previously felt no ill-will toward Russia) to hate Russia far more than Americans hated the Soviet Union during the Cold. Indeed, isn’t it funny that many Jews sided with the USSR and attacked American patriots during the Cold War — following WWII, some Jews even sent atomic secrets to Stalin — , but these very same Jews and their children and grandchildren are the ones who are now most virulently anti-Russian SIMPLY BECAUSE Russia refused to surrender its national sovereignty to Jewish oligarchs and cuck out to the Jewish imperialist proxy agenda of Homomania.
While the Alt Right is trying to defuse tensions and promote peace and tolerance among nations, Jewish supremacists tighten their grip on the US as their private bitch, body guard, bouncer, and hitman to go around bashing nations they don’t like. Jews cannot tolerate the US as neutral power that is fair and balanced to all nations. Jews insist that the US must love what Jews love and must hate what Jews hate. Since Jews love Israel, the US must love Israel. Since Saudis are chummy with Israel, the US must go easy on Saudi Arabia. But since Jews hate Iran and Russia, the US must hate them too. So, if Twitter is really serious, it should ban Zionist psychopaths like Jennifer Rubin and Max Boot. They work for Jewish supremacists who use media and state to pressure and brainwash all Americans to hate other nations.
3. Twitter must purge the Porn Moguls who feel contempt for women & use them as cumbuckets for evil men. The recent #MeToo Movement exposed evil male ‘patriarchy’. Pornography objectifies women as whores and toys for men to play with. Ponographers are misogynists. Since Jews run porn, it means jewish Moguls are the biggest haters of women.
4. Twitter must purge all rap moguls who promote ugly music that celebrates drug trade, gangsterism, and murder and trashes womenfolk as ‘skanky bitchass hos’. This kind of culture has spread murderous hatred in the black community, destroyed families, and sent many to early graves. The violence in Baltimore and St Louis is the product of Jewish and black moguls promoting murderous and hateful attitudes via rap culture.
5. Twitter must purge Homomaniacs who have gone far beyond the call for ‘gay rights’. They now demand Gay Rites as new religion and support the use of US capitalist-imperialism to convert the entire world to Worship of Holy Homo. They hate decency, family, tradition, and morality. Their hate any normal person who will not convert to the culture of degeneracy. But then, Homomania is a mere proxy of Jewish Supremacism.
6. Twitter must purge the ADL that spews hatred against BDS, a movement for justice for Palestinians. ADL is a hateful Jewish supremacist organization that demands that all US politicians collectively hate Palestinians and criminalize BDS that pleads justice for Palestinians who suffered the mass-pogroms of Nakba and now live under apartheid-occupation in the West Bank and under Warsaw-ghetto-like conditions in Gaza.
7. Twitter must purge Jewish supremacists of MSM(like those at Daily Beast) who hate free speech, liberty, free flow of ideas & memes, and the principle of fair play. Jewish supremacists of the Big Media(all monopolized by Jews) rig the game so that their Zio-Homo narrative gets preferential treatment while counter-voices are suppressed. Jews use power of finance to push their agenda. Jews told Twitter, “Big money for you IF you let ADL purge white national liberationists who refuse to serve as white submissvists at the feet of Jewish supremacists.”
Daily Beast is merely a megaphone of Jewish Supremacists who push for more Wars for Israel. The real supremacism in America is that the 2% rules over the 98%.
The ‘Twitter Purge’ is really ADL purge of those who see the reality of Jewish supremacist power and call out on it.
Friday, February 23, 2018
Why did Jews need a Covenant with God? It was because they believed in only one God. If Jews believed in many gods for different peoples as pagan folks did, then there would have been no need for the Covenant. Jews would have said Romans have their gods, Syrians have their gods, Persians have their gods, Egyptians have their gods, and so on; therefore, we Jews have own God or gods. If Jews have their own God or gods and if other peoples have their own gods, then every people are satisfied and secure in the worship of their own gods. In the absence of one God and one Truth to rule over all the heavens, all the earth, and all of man, there is no need for a Covenant. After all, the gods of your people are yours. Granted, pagans might ‘steal’ other people’s gods or fuse their gods with foreign gods. Romans fused many of their gods with Greek gods. Still, your people have a unique set of gods and other peoples have their more-or-less unique sets of gods. Even when one pagan tribe took the gods of another tribe, they eventually transformed the gods into their own. And Jews could have been content with God or gods of their own while believing in the legitimacy of other peoples having their own gods to worship.
But Jews didn’t go that way. Out of boldness, imagination, arrogance, megalomania, or whatever, Jews came to believe in only one God for themselves. So, if pagan folks worshiped many gods, Jews only worshiped one God. But Jews didn’t end there. They decided all the other gods of pagan folks are false gods. They don’t exist, they are not real, they have no validity. Only the one and only Jewish God is the sole maker and ruler of all. In a way, such a development may have been defensive. After all, since many other tribes were bigger and stronger than Jews, there was the chance that Jews might be tempted to ditch the Jewish tribe and its God and go join some other tribe that is mightier and worship their god-idols. But if every Jewish child were instilled from childhood with the warning all other gods are false — and it is a GRAVE SIN to worship their idols — , there was much less chance of Jews going over to other tribes to worship different gods.
But the development of Jewish psycho-theology was also aggressive, ambitious, and ‘imperialist’. If Jews couldn’t conquer the material world with hands and feet, they could conquer the spiritual world with the feat of imagination. So, in their souls, Jews came to believe that their God not only conquered all the world but own all the world. Indeed, Jews went even further and said their God created the world. Pagan mythologies were far more humble in their claim. Few if any said their gods created everything. Even in Hinduism, the gods are as created by the cosmos that is created or ‘dreamed’ by them.
So, in the Jewish spiritual imagination, there is only one God, and this God is for all times, all places, and all peoples. But here’s the rub. If there is only one God, and if He did indeed make all the world, all the peoples, all the places, and all the things, why would He favor any one people? Wouldn't all the world be part of His holiness? Wouldn’t all peoples be His beloved children? Wouldn’t all things be His precious creations? If God is the only God and if He has universal ownership and mastery over everyone and everything, then why would He belong to Jews alone?
Now, such considerations didn’t worry Jews prior to the development of monotheism. At one point, the proto-Jews had their god or gods, and they respected the fact that other tribes had their own gods. So, Jews prayed to their god or gods, and other tribes had their own forms of idol-worship. But at some point, Jews got into ferocious prophetic mode, and their leaps of imagination led to believe that they must worship only one God, and furthermore, their one and only God is the one and only God of all the universe. With a blinding stroke, the Jewish mind exploded an atomic bomb in the spirit-verse and wiped out all the competing gods. "...now I am become Death, the destroyer of gods..." And in the end, the Jewish mind decided there is only one God and one Truth. All other competing gods are not even inferior gods or even defeated gods. They are false gods, and they never existed. They were phony from the start, because from the beginning of time to the end of time, there was, is, and will be only one God, the God of the Jewish imagination.
But if this God is so great and if Jews are such a humble insignificant tribe, why would God favor the Jews? I mean, if there were indeed just one God in the universe, wouldn’t it be likelier that He would favor and side with a great powerful tribe than one so pathetic as that of the Hebrews? In ancient times, the Jews weren’t even close to being a great power. Even at the height of their glory, they ruled over just a bit of land and soon got invaded by others and had to survive at their mercy. So, why would the great God have favored such a pathetic tribe? After all, in pagan stories, gods favor the strong and powerful. Greek gods, Persian gods, Roman gods, or Germanic gods, they bestow affection and favors on the heroes, adventurers, and conquerors. Jews were far less accomplished in those fields that other tribes and kingdoms that were much greater.
And this is why Jews needed to come up with the Covenant. Without it, there was no guarantee that God would stick with the Jews. Imagine there’s an island with only women. Suppose each woman believes in her own dream man. Some women are beautiful, some women are plain, some woman are ugly. But each has a dream of her ideal man. But suppose one homely woman says all their dreams are false. Only HER dream of the ideal man is true. So, her dream and only her dream of man has validity. Now suppose what she says comes to be true. While all the men of other dreams never materialize, the man of her dreams does materialize. Suppose one evening, a man arrives on the shore of the island, and it is the man of the homely woman’s imagination. So, she was right, whereas all the other dreams of man were false. There is only one man, and he is it. BUT, if indeed it is true that he is the only man, a wonderful handsome man, where’s the guarantee that he would choose the homely woman over other women who are much prettier? So, if the homely woman is to bind the man to her, she has to come up with a covenant between him and her. Without that sacred bond, he might act like Bill Clinton and drive her crazy like Billy Boy did to Hillary. Also, not only would he want to go to others, but all the women will want him since the word is out that he is the one and only man. When the women had believed that their dreams of man were also valid, each could hope for the arrival of her special man. But if they all now agree that there is only one man, then all will want to do it with him.
The Jewish way of spirituality and truth has always been ultra-contradictory. They wanted their God to be Lord over all but belong only to the Jews. Jews were like an ultra-jealous wife. Jews insisted there is only one Truth for the world, yet they wanted sole ownership of this truth. We still see this Jewish trait today. America is like the god of power, the one and only superpower in all the world. On the one hand, Jews promote America as the lord of all nations, the one and only model for all peoples and cultures. The American Way is the only way, and all the world must be Americanized abroad, and all peoples must aspire to come to America. And yet, America must serve Jewish interests above all. Even as America is a ruler over and savior of all peoples, it must have a special covenant with the Jews. AIPAC makes sure that the US pledges no loyalty to any other nation but Israel. Jews hate Donald Trump even though he’s pro-Zionist because he ran on better relations with Russia(a nation totally hated by Jews) and ending the Wars for Israel. What? United States improving relations with Russia that refused to let Jews take over everything? What? United States not fighting more wars to strengthen Israel’s hands in the Middle East?
Also, Trump’s anti-immigrationist stance is threatening to the Jewish notion of the special covenant between the US and Jews. After all, the people with the greatest historical claim of covenant with America are the Anglos. They are the ones who settled it with colonies, they are the ones who fought the Revolutionary War, and they are ones who laid the foundations of America. So, if any people can claim a special covenant with the US, it is the Anglos(and their Dutch and Germanic brethren) who did the most heavy-lifting in the formative stages to expand and build the nation. American Indians were here first, but they had to be removed in order for America to be possible. Black slaves did a lot of heavy-lifting in the South, but it wasn’t their vision, ideas, values, culture, and language that made America.
But if Anglos have a special covenant with America, then it means Jews have no right to steer the one and only America as lone superpower to their own ends. If America must serve Jews like the one and only God serves the Jews, then the American covenant must be with Jews, not with Anglos. Just like God lords over all peoples but only serves Jews, America must lord over(and provide for) all peoples but serve only Jews. Imagine if America decided to serve the interests and the narrative of Palestinian-Americans as well as that of Jewish-Americans. Zionism would come under a lot of heat, like white rule in South Africa.
Trump’s implicitly pro-white anti-immigration stance is seen by Jews as an attempt to restore the American covenant back into the hands of white gentiles, especially people of Anglo-Celtic-Germanic stock. Even though Jews frame the immigration-debate as one between ‘white supremacist’ America and wonderful Diversity, it’s really between white American special covenant and Jewish American special covenant. Jews are pro-immigration because, on their own, they simply don’t have the numbers. Now, if the US were 80% Jewish, I guarantee Jews would NOT be calling for more immigration unless it’s Jewish.
Because Anglos and Northern Europeans have the most powerful rationale for a special covenant with America, Jews have done everything to impugn, discredit, invalidate, or reinterpret the founding and development of America. So, Jews say the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were not foundations for a creation of white Christian nation but a universal proposition nation. So, Jews make a big fuss about black slavery to instill whites with guilt. (Jews don't make a fuss about slavery in Latin American nations even though they brought over many more slaves — and many Jews were involved in slavery in Brazil — because Jews need Latinos as allies against whites. Jews also don’t make much of a fuss about the ‘genocide’ and ‘rape’ of the indigenous folks in Latin America for the same reason and also to promote race-mixing as a good to deracinate the white race. And Jews are no longer interested in American Indians because their tragic story is about how immigration-invasion can destroy the native cultures of a land. It’s difficult to be romantic about Emma Lazarus when one considers what happened to American Indians. It’s like Zionist immigration to Palestine led to Nakba and dispossession of Palestinians who ended up on their trail of tears.) To instill whites with guilt, Jews made the Civil War a bigger event than the Revolutionary War. It won’t be long before Jews make the date of Emancipation Proclamation or the end of the Civil War a bigger holiday than the Fourth of July. Jews also love the Civil War because it could be spun as ‘good whites’ siding with ‘justice’ against ‘bad whites’, a theme that would recur in WWII(for far more valid reason as Hitler was really something else). The Jewish lesson of the American Civil War is that whites must attack and fight other whites than side with fellow whites. Jews thrive from divisions among gentiles. Jews remember how the rapprochement between Northern whites and Southern whites led to tremendous revival of white power that held back Jewish interests in the first half of the 20th century. The massive immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe drove many Northern whites(even former Liberals and Progressives) into an alliance with fellow Anglos in the South. All their own problem with immigrants made them sympathize more with Southern whites’ problem with blacks. Northern whites felt, "If we are having such trouble with white folks such as Poles, Russians, Hungarians, Greeks, Italians, Jews, and etc., imagine how tough it must be down south with all them Negroes?" And, so there was growing unity of spirit and purpose between Northern Anglos and Southern whites, and this unity led to tremendous political victories, one of which was ending mass immigration in the mid 1920s. Jews see this as a calamity because of WWII and the Shoah. Jews feel that, had the immigration gates been kept open, many more Jews could have escaped Europe. But Jews never ask themselves whether things would not have gotten so bad for Jews if (1) they didn’t play such a prominent role in the Bolshevik Revolution that ended up killing and tyrannizing so many people (2) they didn’t employ financial dirty trick and cultural degeneracy to make things far worse for Germans in the depressions that followed WWI. But expecting self-reflection among the likes of Jennifer Rubin, William Kristol, Jonathan Podhoretz, Max Boot, Harvey Weinstein, Sarah Silverman, and etc. is a bridge too far.
Anyway, Jews eventually gained near-total control of the elite institutions and industries of America as the one-and-only-superpower(following the Cold War and so-called End of History), and they decided to change the narrative and whatever necessary to ensure that the American Covenant is with Jews and only with Jews. And to secure this, America must rule over Diversity because Diversity cannot unite against Jewish power. And white people will forget about White America because such a concept stirs up memory of a different time when most white Americans felt, most justifiably, that the main American covenant is with Anglos and Anglo-Americanized white European Christians. This is why Jews are so eager to destroy the notion of White America. This is why Jews promote stuff like HAMILTON that has the Founding Fathers as a bunch of ‘groids’. And of course, Latin American whites are eager to collaborate with Jews since the much greater success of Anglo-America had made them feel so small and insignificant for so long. It’s the Latin American way of getting revenge by serving as toadies of Jews.
And it is also why Jews have been especially committed to spreading PC in Northern European nations like UK, Sweden, Ireland, and Germany. After all, those peoples were the covenant-ial building blocks of America. Consider the films EMIGRANTS and THE NEW LAND by Jan Troell. In the past, when white Americans looked back to those nations, they saw whiteness, all whiteness, and the whiteness reminded them of their true origins and roots. But now, due to Jewish intellectual virus having infected the institutions of all those nations, they’ve been committed to (1) massive non-white immigration (2) declaring that their identity is purely cultural and not of blood (3) race-mixing makes for superior people because pale whites sucks (4) feminism that makes white women hate white men, thus breaking the sexual covenant between white men and white women (5) Jungle Fever and ACOWW(Afro-Colonization of White Wombs) on the premise that white women must go with ‘superior’ Negro males while cucky white males accept their inferiority and crawl into their Cuckanda (6) retro-characterizing European heroes and giants as black, a common practice with BBC; even a Finnish TV movie cast a black guy in the role of a famous military officer.
So, there is a reason why Jews have intensified their culture war in Northern European nations. Why did Jewish media pour so much efforts into those nations? It’s because of their historical, cultural, and racial ties to their cousins in the US. As American browns, white Anglos, Germans, Irish, Swedes, and other are bound to look to the old countries for identity and roots. But if even their ancient homelands are Africanized, Asianized, and Islamized, they don’t even have a homeland to hark back to. (Imagine if you remember a time when everyone in your community was white, and things were so much better. The memory of an earlier time might inspire you to rebel against the current order. But suppose Jews have a mind-device that alters your memory so that you remember half of your white friends as blacks or browns. Then, even memory would no longer be a guide to action to restore what you've lost.)
Now, you don’t see Jews doing the same to Israel. Why would American Jews support Jewish-only immigration to Israel but push for non-white invasion of nations like UK, Ireland, Sweden, Germany, and etc? It’s not only to break the white will in those nations but to gaslight and demoralize white Americans. If white Americans see the very lands of their forefathers and foremothers going the way of Diversity and even celebrating it like retards, then what hope is there for white revival in the US? And once white hope is broken, Jews will own the American Covenant for themselves forever as NO OTHER PEOPLE have claim to it once whites are out of the picture. It’s also like Jews believe Israel can have nukes but not Iran.
Anyway, the Jewish contradiction of God, Truth, and Power wasn’t exactly stable. Indeed, it was radioactive. How can a people come up with an idea of the one and only God but insist this God serves only Jews even as He rules over all? And why would He make a special promise to Jews but not to any other people? How can such a singular and universal God be cuffed to one people? Now, this contradiction didn’t matter so much when most gentiles just ignored Jews and showed no interest in Jewish spiritual ideas. Indeed, for the longest time, the Romans scoffed at Jewish pretensions. The Roman way was to just let the Jews be as long as they paid their taxes. I mean what did it matter to gentiles or to Jews if Jewish faith belonged only with Jews? Even if Jews say there is only one God, your own pagan tribe can go on believing in your own gods.
But then, something happened. Jesus, His Disciples, and Paul decided to ‘democratize’ God’s rule. He would be made into a ‘propositional’ God, and the Jewish Biblical ‘constitution’ would be reinterpreted to mean that, from the beginning, the REAL prophecy of the Torah pointed to the arrival of Jesus who would make God’s justice and love equal to all the people of the world. This was bound to make the Jews shit, not least because the crazy idea was hatched by a bunch of Jews. I mean, the Old Testament is clearly Tribal and says God gave the Covenant to the Jews. But the New Testament claimed deeper understanding of sacred texts that interpreted events in the Old Testament as prophecy paving the way for Jesus the Messiah for all mankind. Jews reacted to this like Alan Dershowitz reacts to Norman Finkelstein or Philip Weiss.
Now, if Christianity had merely spread to some weak pagan tribes under Roman rule, it might not have amounted to much. But it eventually made inroads into the Roman elites, and they finally decided to make it the official and then the ONLY faith in the land. This meant that the universal vision of Jesus would have the backing of universal military might. The word and the sword would work together. Now, why were the Romans finally attracted to Christianity? Outwardly, one might say some Romans were moved by the story of Jesus, His love, His sacrifice, His Resurrection, His message of peace and justice, His promise of afterlife to the virtuous and redeemed. But there was surely another reason. Through Jesus, Romans could claim to have the blessing of the most powerful conception of God ever. So, the message of Jesus’ love was really a cover for what REALLY attracted the Romans to the new faith. Its God was the most powerfully conceived deity in the universe. Compared to Him, Jupiter was but a gopher. Indeed, all the pagan Roman gods combined didn’t amount to pack of prairie dogs compared to the Jewish conception of God. After all, the Roman gods weren’t all powerful. They weren’t around at the beginning of time. They have to negotiate with other gods since each power as limited powers. In contrast, the Jewish God is infinite, eternal, all-encompassing, all-knowing, all-powerful, and everything under and over the sun. Romans had always been dissatisfied with their own gods because they were limited in form and power. For a people hellbent on conquering all the known world, their gods just didn’t keep up with the pace. It was like having a rock band where the lead guitarist played only acoustic. For them to really make it big, they would need a Jimmi Page or Eric Clapner as electric guitar god. Likewise, if Romans were to be masters of all, they needed to follow a God who was the ruler of all. This way, Romans could not only own all of earth but all of heaven. They would conquer not only bodies but souls.
And this is when things got really serious for Jews. It was one thing to be live under pagan Roman rule. But when Romans had the Jewish God as their own and not only spread the faith among Romans but all peoples within the Empire, Jews really needed to hold onto the covenant to remain a special people. Prior to the spread of Christianity, the special relation between Jews and God could be maintained simply because non-Jews showed little or no interest in Jewish culture or faith. But once the Jewish concept of God went nuclear, exploded, and spread all over the world, it was only the Covenant that assured them a fallout shelter... like the one that the school-master is trying to open at the end of Coen Brothers’ SERIOUS MAN as a tornado approaches. Without that Covenant, Jews could have been swept up with the rest of humanity in the new faith and become scattered, assimilated, and lost among so many other tribes.
Now, what does this have to do with White folks? It’s a question of survival. When the Jewish God was universalized, how were Jews able to survive as a people and culture? Because, despite the fact that Jews and Christians(and later Muslims) worshiped the same God, only Jews had the Covenant that made them feel that they and only they had a special contract with God. So, in the end, it didn’t matter to Jews if their God went over to gentiles who called themselves Christians or Muslims. What mattered was that Jews could carry on with their ancient conviction that, even if God rules over all of mankind and shows His love to them, only the Jews have a special covenant with Him.
Of course, Christians and Muslims could tell themselves that Jews are deluded, that the Jewish Covenant was broken with the coming of Jesus, and that Jews are just so full of shi* with their conceit of a special Covenant. Also, how could Jews compete with growing numbers of Christians and Muslims — as both encouraged conversion among all humanity around the world — when Jews, who favor Covenant over Conversion, remained fixed in number and expanded only by the slow process of childbirth? And yet, the lack of a special covenant among Christians and Muslims meant that their power would be diffuse, divided, and confused than concentrated. Because Jews were a family of people, their Covenant bound their shared blood with God. In contrast, precisely because Christians and Muslims came to comprise such large populations, they couldn’t agree on much of anything. So, Catholics and Protestants got to fighting. And Shias and Sunnis got to hating each other. Also, even if the faithful were all of one sect or denomination, they could be divided along race. It’s like white Christians, black Christians, and Mexican Christians never had much in common, and each people invoked God for totally different purposes.
But because Christians, especially white ones for some reason, theoretically identify with and care for all fellow Christians regardless of race, creed, or color, their sense of white identity and interests grew weaker. Also, try as they might, even with the utmost goodwill, to connect with non-whites as fellow Christians or possible converts, there wasn’t much that whites felt in common with non-whites. In contrast, Jews were compact and united, relatively speaking, and all the more remarkable considering that they had to survive as minorities in exile and scattered all over the Middle East and Europe. Jewish power was like a city where the population is closely packed together. The Covenant provided Jews, even in exile, with a sense of shared blood and purpose. So, some Jews could be in Poland, some Jews could be in Germany, some Jews could be in Italy, some Jews could be in Iran, and etc., but the Covenant made them feel close even though they were so distant from one another and unlikely to ever meet one another. But as long as the Covenant existed, there was the Israel of the heart even before there was Israel of the feet that called on World Jewry to come together in family unification. Now, consider the Japanese in contrast. Because they have no Covenant, they can easily become estranged from one another. Japanese in America just become Americanized and ridiculous like Yoko Ono. And when Japanese who’d settled in Brazil returned to Japan, the Japanese people didn’t relate to them, and they didn’t relate to Japanese people. And in neighboring Korea, there is hardly any passion for national reunification because, lacking a national Covenant, Koreans don’t feel very close to one another despite their long history of having survived as one people and culture. And have you seen Josef Stalin’s granddaughter recently? That Russo-Georgian idiot, having no real grounding in meaningful identity or heritage, has degenerated into an idiot teen-wanna-be. And of course, Jews who lose a meaningful sense of Jewishness are also likely to lose it and turn into flotsam and jetsam.
For a long long time, there was a kind of defacto covenant between Europeans and Christianity. Even though the origins of Christianity are in the Middle East and even though the faith spread all over Near East and North Africa, the eventual triumph of Islam turned those areas into Islamosphere. Had those parts remained Christian, the history of Christianity for the first 1,500 yrs might have been bi- or tri-racial. But because Arabs and other non-whites became Muslim, Christianity became mostly a mono-racial power in conflict with Muslims who were not only different in both faith and face. As such, there was no danger of the Vatican being overrun with a bunch of darkies and swarthers. A blackamoor like Othello was an exception than the rule in most of Europe except in parts that had been colonized by North Africans for a spell.
Had Europe kept to itself, its people-culture-religion may have remained all-in-the-family. But for a host of reasons, the West came to dominate all the Rest. Indeed, the Western Way became so dominant and so pervasive that people all around the world don’t even realize how Westernized they’ve become in terms of their dress, technology, eating habits, and use of time. This Triumph of the West can be a matter of pride for Europeans(and white Americans are really just transplanted Europeans), but as with the Romans who conquered everyone but then got conquered by everyone, there is a good chance that whites will lose their way precisely because the Western Way has become the World Way. Because the West did so much to transform the world, there is this idea that the world should not only learn from the West but come to the West, become part of the West, and constitute the New Way. So, non-whites should abandon their way to join the Western Way as the only World Way, and in turn, whites should abandon their identity to accommodate all the non-whites who want to be part of the Western way. So, non-whites lose their culture to become Western, and whites lose their race to universalize the Western Way.
Obviously, this is a recipe for disaster for the white race, white heritage, and white territoriality. The current globalism is a pipe dream. It’s one thing to find John Lennon’s "Imagine" to be a nice in melody and sentiment, but it’s quite another to form a world order on the basis of such tripe, all the more so when so much that is now called ‘Western’ is really Jewish supremacist, Afro-thuggery, and Homomaniacal. Therefore, it is of the greatest essence that white people look deep into their hearts and history to formulate a covenant for themselves in the current globalized order. We cannot put the genie of universalism back in the bottle. The Western Way of math, science, economics, technology, pop culture, and dress have become universalized. Also, all the world has caught onto the concept of ‘human rights’, and there is no going back from English being a World Language. Just like what had been unique to the Jews became universalized through Christianity, what had been unique to the West has become universalized through Western military power, communication, free trade, pop culture, media, and academia, much of it controlled by Jews. When so much that had been uniquely white had been made rendered worldwide, how can anything uniquely European survive. This is where it requires individual with leaps and depths of imagination and vision to formulate a unique covenant between white people and the destiny of the world.
Even when the Jewish God became a World God, Jews survived as a people and culture by doubling down on their Covenant that said their relationship to God was special. So, even as Jews recognized how God could be revered and worshiped by peoples all over the world, they maintained that they had a special connection to God that was unlike any other. Then, likewise, whites people need to come up with some way to believe that even though the Western Way has become the World Way, there are still things so deeply unique and special in being white that white folks and only white folks have this Covenant with the Western World Way.
Wednesday, February 21, 2018
Jared Taylor Cannot Win with Facts and Reason Alone - Vision of Future trumps View of Reality - Richard Spencer’s Vision Needs to Smoke Less Crack
There are two prominent figures in the alternative sphere of the rightist spectrum. There is Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer.
Jared Taylor makes good sense backed with facts and logic on a host of issues, but he lacks the vision thing. After all, Moses didn’t manage to lead all those Hebrews out of Egypt just by noticing facts around him. He inspired his people with the vision of a better tomorrow and the Promised Land. He promised them the laws of God on the conviction that God, the one and only God, was on their side. Without such prophecy, neither the mythical Moses nor the historical Muhammad could have achieved what they did. We may learn a lot from someone who points to things around us and gives a factual analysis of every item. But we aren’t likely to be inspired by him or look to him for The Truth, the one that lends meaning, purpose, and direction to our lives. Rather, it is the man who points to the distant horizon and speaks of the great future that inspires people and make them want to follow him. He is the prophet who is far-sighted, whereas the ‘factualists’ are short-sighted.
We need all the fact-based people we can find as they get things done in the world, but the future is made by those who lead the people to ‘another’ world. This another world could be literal in the sense of discovering or conquering a distant territory. Or it could be a vision of how our own land could be transformed into something far greater.
Now, Jared Taylor does have a passion and objective of sorts. He is passionately committed to his own race, culture, and heritage. And he looks forward to a world where whites will be safe and secure in identity and posterity. But it doesn’t excite or inspire because the Taylor’s vision of a good society is all about the A-B-C’s of stability. If he could have a Father-Knows-Best-like society for his own people, he would be content, and that would be that. Such a society would certainly be nice, but it’s not visionary enough to inspire masses of white people to view it as their Promised Land. To inspire the masses, the vision must be more than something nice or something-that-had-been. It has to be something that has yet to be, something so great, wondrous, and glorious. It needn’t be something as fanciful(and ridiculous) as Wakanda, but the vision has to be powerful enough to turn people into zealots and true believers who are willing to kill and die for this vision.
If Bolsheviks, Italian Fascists, National Socialists, Zionists, and Lazarusites have one thing in common, it is the Vision thing. Benito Mussolini convinced Italians that they could once again become a race of heroes, like the warriors of Roman Times, if they come together as a people under his leadership. Bolsheviks intoxicated both the educated elites and landless peasants with a future vision of the End of History of justice and truth. Zionists excited Jews with the hope not only of nation of their own but the recovery of their lost Holy homeland. And the cult-worshipers of Emma Lazarus romanticized the notion of America as a Proposition Nation, the full greatness of which has yet to be realized with the arrival of dreamers from all over the world. Good or bad, sensible or insane, those -isms offer more than facts and reasons. They offer a vision.
In the end, people are not moved by clarity of the empirical mind but the fever of the imperial spirit. Clarity of facts and logic reduces our emotional heat. So, while Jared Taylor makes a convincing case on matters of race and culture, he leaves us feeling calm, cool, and collected. But history is not made by gentlemen. Gentlemen are good managers and officials. But they are not the ones who supply the heat and the juice to make the people want to do something more than the usual, the normal, the routine, and the mundane. Napoleon didn’t inspire his men with facts and data. He made them believe in him, his abilities as leader and his vision of glory for France and the Revolution. T. E. Lawrence convinced all those divided Arab tribes to follow him and serve him not with dry lectures on history or cold political analysis. And it wasn’t just the promise of loot either. He made them believe in his special powers and the dream of Arab unity and glory that had been out-of-reach under Ottoman Rule.
And he did all this despite not even being a Muslim. He managed to convince Arab Muslims to fight fellow Muslims of the Ottoman Empire because his showbiz quasi-prophet act was so compelling.
In the end, history is made by people who believe in a Taboo. They feel what they believe isn’t merely factual or true but holy and sacred. Indeed, the holy and sacred is favored even over factual evidence. After all, we can factually debunk or intellectually deconstruct much of Jewish religion, myths, legends, and history. We can say that, as there never was a God, the notion of Promised Land or Holy Land is just nonsense. Based on chemistry, the dirt in Palestine/Israel is no different from dirt in any neighboring nation. So, there was no Covenant. It was all an invention. And Moses probably never existed, at least in the version told in the Old Testament. But none of that matters to Zionists, even the most secular ones. They BELIEVE in a covenant with history if not with God. And this myth fills them with a vision of the future that MUST be. It is NOT negotiable. And this vision is so powerful that even the most secular leftist Israeli Jews will pick up assault rifles and kill bushels of Arabs, Muslims, and Persians IF that’s what it takes to preserve Israel as the eternal vision of home for the Jews.
Richard Spencer understands this need for Big Vision, a sense of not only being right but righteous. In the end, an order cannot exist for long without its zealots. Israel may have secular elites who think about ‘higher’ and drier things, but it survives only because it has its core neo-Zealots who are willing to go to any length to defend the nation from enemies from both within and without. Now, if an order is totally overrun by zealots, things can get out of hand, like Iran during it rabid Islamo-revolutionary phase. A healthy society needs more than vision, passion, and conviction. There is value in liberal open-mindedness and inquiry. But if an order is only open-minded and dryly intellectual, it won’t have the ferocity to come together and defend the order against enemies. It’s like a person needs more than passion and fists. He needs a mind and heart. But without the fists ready to fight off the threats, the mind and heart will have no security. Before any idea or value, the person must survive as an organism, and that means it must be ready at all times to move into the mode of ferocity and fists to fend off any enemy that threatens his survival and well-being. And this will to survive isn’t based on an idea but an animal passion. But since animal passion alone will just keep a person on the level of an animal(like so many blacks), the mind and heart have to create a vision for the fury and fists to serve. And this vision is something more than objective accounting of reality. Israelis are not committed to defending their nation because they have an objective assessment of their land in terms of economics, minerals, agriculture, water, and etc. After all, the rules of agriculture and market economics, like laws of gravity, are pretty much universal all around the world. All nations read from the same economics and chemistry books. No people ever wanted to defend their nation based on the mere sciences of economics, sociology, psychology, or archaeology. After all, a rational and scientific understanding of anything is a universal endeavor and belongs to all peoples. Even non-Germans can read about German history or brush up on what archaeology has to say about ancient Germanic folks. Even non-Greeks can learn about Greek philosophy, and even non-Jews can read about the history of the part of the world called Palestine/Israel. Knowledge doesn’t belong to any single people. So, if anyone can learn about the history of Jews or Israel(and can even gain more knowledge about Jewish history & culture than your average Jew does), why is it that Jews believe that Jewishness and Israel belong to them in the way such don’t belong to any other people? Why are Jews willing to fight and die for Jewishness and Israel in ways that mere gentile scholars of Jewish culture and Israel do not? It’s because Jews have something more than objective or scholarly interest and knowledge about Israel. They have a powerful sense of their myth, narrative, tragedy, and future/destiny that binds them together. And Jews feel that even gentiles who strongly identify and sympathize with Jews cannot be part of the Tribe. (Incidentally, the reason why many whites so strongly identify with Jews and Israel even though they’re rebuffed by Jews is because they’ve been denied passion in their own identity or failed to develop something on their own with their own vision of the covenant.)
Furthermore, it’s not enough to say that whites are special and especially accomplished. After all, a people who do great things only attract attention from around the world. All great empires not only tried to conquer the world but absorb the world. So, if whites are said to be so great, then, it leads to the logic of universalism, i.e. whites should spread their greatness all over the world(because, after all, greatness wants to rule and doesn’t want to be contained), and the rest of humanity should be able to partake of this greatness.
If whites are to survive as a unique race and culture, the notion of greatness or superiority(in IQ or talent) isn’t enough. Greatness only attracts the attention of others. Also, greatness wants to be admired by others. What great actor or actress doesn’t want to be loved by as many people as possible? What great corporation doesn’t want to expand its market share all over the world? Indeed, when it comes to their great achievements in science, financial power, entertainment, and media, Jews want to take over the entire world. While greatness seeks to dominate others, it also absorbs them, and as the result, the Other also becomes a part of the Great Power. Also, greatness, in its sheer meritocracy, doesn’t necessarily favor one group over another. In some cases, group differences are so stark that meritocracy does lead to total or near-total domination by one group. On meritocracy alone, women cannot compete with men in sports. If women want to play, they need a sports league of their own. In basketball, meritocracy has led to near-total black domination. But greatness in many fields does not so decisively favor one group over all others. Greatness in chemistry, physics, and computer sciences led to the rise of many white, Jewish, and Asian scientists and engineers. Since greatness favors greatness over mediocrity, white greatness will favor non-white greatness over white mediocrity. So, even if one could make the argument that whites have achieved the greatest things in history, putting greatness, ability, and talent at the center of everything will undermine ethno-nationalism and identity of collective racial inheritance. After all, even if it’s true that whites have been more adept at reason and science than other races, the fact still remains that most whites are not very smart or creative. Meanwhile, there are plenty of non-whites who are very smart and creative, and if given a chance by the Western system, will do head-and-shoulders better than most whites. And then, whites of intelligence and creativity will favor non-whites of intelligence and creativity because the system would put greatness and meritocracy at the center of all things. And this is why all this stuff about IQ doesn’t cut it. It’s interesting and informative but doesn’t support the Vision necessary for the survival of a race, culture, and territory.
This is obvious from the case of Jews. If indeed Jews should primarily care about greatness and meritocracy, then the smartest, most creative, most successful, and most powerful Jews should primarily seek out their counterparts of excellence among the gentiles. Smart Jews shouldn’t care about dumb Jews just like smart whites are told to dump on dumb whites. Smart whites are told to think meritocratically and identify mainly with smart Jews and smart non-whites. If smart and powerful Jews acted just like smart and privileged whites, would Jewish people, Jewish culture, and Jewish nation survive? After all, even though Jews are, on average, smarter than other groups, there are plenty of not-so-smart Jews. And yet, Jewish identity, culture, and nationalism remain strong because smart Jews believe they should primarily identify with other Jews, smart or dumb. So, even though smart Jews will work with smart non-Jews in elite endeavors of physics, chemistry, finance, and computers, when away from work their main identity and loyalty are with Jewishness, Jewish history, Jewish culture, and Jewish nationhood in Israel.
In contrast, look at the decline of Episcopalians despite the fact that they had an IQ equivalent or possibly even higher than of Ashkenazi Jews. So, why did Jewish power keep rising whereas Episcopalian power faded despite their individual successes. As individuals, there are still many successful, rich, and/or super-privileged Episcopalians. But because they abandoned their sense of racial/cultural unity and history/heritage, the sense of their own community was lost. Episcopalianism was both too exclusive and too weak to survive as an identity. Those within the denomination were exclusive enough to set themselves apart from other white Christians, but they lacked an communal sense that was powerful enough to hold the community together like among Jews(or even Mormons). Power isn’t more than a series of individual successes. True power is the unity of those of individualities. It’s like a bunch of individuals can be great warriors, but if each fights only for himself than coming together to form an army, they won’t stand a chance against the power composed of individuals working as a team. If every wolf acted as a lone wolf, it could not bring down a moose, elk, or bear. But if they work as a team, they can bring down the biggest game.
Jews retained a powerful pack instinct, whereas Episcopalians, despite equal intelligence, eventually turned into lone wolves. Since Episcopalians couldn’t form a pack of their own, their lone talents attached themselves to those with pack instinct. Today, most successful white gentiles just serve Jewish interests because Jews still act as a pack to form a dominant team. The only way this team can be countered is by forming counter-teams, but Jews have used their control of academia and media to indoctrinate white gentiles with the idea that pack-mentality is noble among Jews(and blacks) but downright evil and ‘supremacist’ for whites.
Imagine single beams of light. They are all very nice but unless all those beams converge, there cannot be the super-beam that burns as bright as the sun. Indeed, the Sun is powerful because so much matter converged over time within a single gravitational field to create that great furnace in space. It’s like charcoal. If you have 20 lit charcoals and place them apart, you won’t be able to cook anything because there is no combined heat. To cook a steak, you have to pack the coals together for a real flames that can cook a whole pig(though, to be sure, pigs should be spared for their intelligence). It’s like what Albert Speer pulled off at the 1936 Berlin Olympics where all the beams of light converted to create a super-beam, an artificial sun in the sky.
So, it isn’t enough for White National Liberators to focus so much on metrics of intelligence, creativity, originality, personality traits, or whatever. This is especially because ability and superiority tends to be disloyal to the tribe. If a white guy is good in basketball, he will play with blacks in the NBA because he wants to be with the best. A pretty white cheerleader will not side with race. Since she has something of special value(her looks), she will want to be associated with someone else with special value, and if a Negro beats a white guy in sports, she will go with the Negro because of his athletic superiority. A brilliant Chinese scientist may decide to move to the US and work at MIT because American academic institutions are where the best minds are. And even smart Jews are tempted to forgo Jewish interest IF doing so boosts their chances of being with the best people.
Fortunately for Jews, even when Jews go for total meritocracy, they can be assured of being with lots of fellow Jews since Jews have a decisive advantage in IQ. And even when Jews marry non-Jews, it’s usually the case that the latter decides to raise the kids as Jewish since Jewishness has such prestige in the halls of power. The thing is Jews didn’t become so powerful with merit alone. It wasn’t simply because Jews tend to be smarter, and therefore, there are more smart Jews in high places. It’s because all those Jewish beams of light converged to create the Jewish sun of power. Because Jews know this is the secret to their own power, they discourage it among gentiles. Without their strong sense of tribe and unity, Jewish advantage in ability and intelligence could paradoxically be a liability where Jewish power is concerned. Again, despite higher general Jewish IQ, most Jews are not geniuses or even very smart. Your average Jew has an IQ of 110 to 115, which is good but not outstanding by any stretch of the imagination. And there are Jews with IQ considerably lower than that. Israel has a lot of Sephardic Jews, and their IQ isn’t much above that of Arabs. So, if Jews went by meritocracy alone, they could easily become like Episcopalians in no time. The smart and successful Jews will only watch out for their own individual interests and, being deracinated, prefer to identify with fellow successful people regardless of their race, color, or creed. In time, the top talents among Jews will feel closer to smart Anglos, smart Arabs, smart Chinese, smart Russians, smart Latins, and even smart Iranians. The middling Jews and dumb Jews will have no representation, leadership, guidance, and protection from powerful Jews. Eventually, they will lose heart and confidence while the smart Jews just look out for self-interest like Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Notice that Jews never speak up for Anglo-identity, Christian power, or European heritage. Indeed, such are seen as bad or tainted. In contrast, Hillary supported Israel even in its savage beat-down of Gazans, and Joe Biden, though a deracinated piece of turd, calls himself a ‘Zionist’. According to the likes of George Hee-Hawley, white people are evil ‘racists’ or ‘white supremacists’ if they want to preserve their own identity and heritage, but it’s perfectly okay for Jews to not only uphold their own identity, culture, and territory BUT compel even non-Jews like Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, John McCain, Donald Trump, and Nikki Haley to go all out in their support of Zionism, indeed even Zionist imperialism over West Bank.
The fact is whites need to be like Jews. Smart, middle, or dumb, it doesn’t matter. If you’re white, you’re part of the family. It’s like a decent member of the family doesn’t disown his brother or sister because he or she isn’t very smart. A race is an extended family. A true nation must be a place for this extended family where every member, from smartest to dumbest, has a sense of belonging. So, even though a white chemist at work must cooperate with chemists of all colors around the world, away from work he must be a white man whose main loyalty is to his race, culture, and nation. And if Jews complain, tell them to stop having their own pack mentality.
Jared Taylor is a perfect gentleman, but gentlemen don’t make history, esp if they don’t have power. Gentlemen can inherit and manage power, but they lack the power of vision to generate the necessary passion for power. Gentlemen stand for moderation, civility, and order, all of which are fine qualities to have in an order, but the forceful will of power was not generated by those qualities to conquer lands or convert souls. Gentlemen are about compromise and negotiation, which are necessary modes in what we call a ‘free society’, but an order is almost never created by compromise but by a compulsive drive to make a vision or dream come true(as long as it has real-world chance of success). Granted, the visionaries can’t only be insistent. While it’s true that Jews realized the dream of Zionism by being insistent, persistent, and zealous, they also knew when to negotiate. Also, Jews had developed many sources of power in finance, media, and government to exert influence over goyim. If Jews had been like lowly Gypsies and just made demands, they would have gotten nowhere.
And it’s also true that Stalin, Hitler, and Mao often played it passive/aggressive. They could put on a nice face, appear moderate or willing to compromise, and be very diplomatic. But even when they were playing ‘nice’, they still had a fire burning within them for the fullest realization of their vision. They could speak softly, but they always carried their hot poker. They could lower to heat to assure rivals and enemies that they favor warmth all around, but they still tended the hot fire within the furnace of power. Jews were passive/aggressive in their push for Zionism, but the passive side always served the aggressive side. Jews were sometimes willing to seem ‘nice’ to look for vulnerabilities on the other side so that, when the time was right, they could drive the stake right through the heart. It’s like a boxer will sometimes move back, throw light jabs, and pretend to go easy... only to find that perfect moment to land the real blows to send the opponent to the canvas. So, Jews weren’t just sparring with their opponents. Even when they seemed to go ‘easy’, they had KO on their minds. And this is a kind of instinct that is alien to Jared Taylor. Raised with southern gentlemanly qualities and patrician instincts, he lacks the power of balls and the instinct to bite-and-tear-off-the-other-balls. He wants to remain above the fray and keep his hands clean. He wants to be dignified, rational, and moderate, even though his views are considered ‘extreme’ by the current Narrative. In contrast, Jews, even though they can seem civil and gentlemanly like Taylor, do have the chimpanzee-an power of balls and instinct to ball-bust other balls. Chimpanzees got big balls because they want to hump as many chimpanzesses as possible. They are truly Portnoic in their lust for domination and fun.
The once glorious revival of the American South in the American Imagination despite the terrible defeat in the Civil War owed to the Southern control of their own Narrative. The South stuck with the Narrative that white Southerners were the tragic victims of Northern white race-betrayal and aggression. And Southern historians depicted the Reconstruction as rape of the South by carpetbaggers, much like Russians feel that their nation was ravaged by Jewish globalists in the 1990s. Also, Southern Whites depicted blacks as the big threat to white social and moral order. D.W. Griffith’s THE BIRTH OF A NATION had an electric effect on the nation. And GONE WITH THE WIND blew away UNCLE TOM’S CABIN. While Harriet Beecher Stowe won the war, Margaret Mitchell won the peace by ennobling the tragic defeat of the South as a romantic epic. Almost no one reads UNCLE TOM’S CABIN, but GONE WITH THE WIND still has countless fans around the world. Even William Faulkner, though very critical of the South, had great nostalgia for Southern heritage. All of this came crashing down with the Civil Rights Movement and thereafter that not only championed the rights and the counter-narrative of Negroes(which was understandable and justifiable since blacks also had a tragic narrative that had been suppressed by White Southerners) but waged total war on anything that imbued the South with tragedy, nobility, integrity, and beauty. In time, Jews got white Northerners to despise everything about the white south, and Southern elites, having been educated by Jews and Liberals, came to loathe their own heritage. According to the current Narrative, there was NOTHING redeemable about the South. So, if there's any glory to America, it all belongs to the North(mainly because it defeated the South) and Immigrants. But this is, of course, bogus since the North, even more than the South, led the Manifest Destiny that wiped out the Indians. Isn’t ‘genocide’ worse than slavery? Also, didn’t the arrival of all those Immigrants lead to greater westward expansion and more ‘genocide’? Jews may have been escaping from pogroms in Eastern Europe, but they came to a nation created by pogroms against Indians. So, how noble are the Jews? (Furthermore, Jews played a key role in the Southern slave economy.) Now, the American Narrative of Westward Expansion shows that one can have a dual narrative about a nation. One can admire the great white vision of conquering the West and turning what had been a savage wilderness into a great new nation. But one can also acknowledge the tragedy of Indians who got trampled and cast aside by the march of progress. We can honor both the triumph of the cowboys and the tragedy of the Indians. But when it comes to the South, "there is only one side", and this BS from Jews who were heavily involved in communist mass-killing, financial destruction of nations, and Nakba & Wars for Israel in the 20th century and 21st century.
This is why one must KNOW YOUR JEW before doing battle with them. For persistent, insistent, and obsessive Jews, there is no compromise. It’s their way or the highway. Notice how Putin made things very good for Jews despite his move against certain Jewish oligarchs who looted the nation in the 1990s. Many Jews were allowed to remain filthy rich, and the Jewish community in Russia gets extra-protection as anti-Jewish sentiments and actions are severely proscribed. But do Jews show any appreciation? No, the likes of Max Boot the chimpan-Jew wants to get together with other nasty Jews and chew on Putin’s balls all night long.
Jared Taylor is under the delusion that Jews can be negotiated with on grounds of equal partnership. It is a gentlemanly approach, but it is deeply flawed because Jews aren’t interested in equal partnership. They want total domination and control. Jews are pushy and fierce. They want it all. Was the guy in THE HEARTBREAK KID willing to compromise? No, he wanted total ownership of the golden shikse poon. If the father had said, "Okay, you can’t marry and screw my daughter, but she will give one blowjob per month", does anyone think the Jewish guy would have said OK? No way. He wanted the whole nine yards.
There are three reasons why Jews don’t want equal partnership with white goyim. (1) Being smarter, Jews think they have the right to dominate others. (2) Being a minority with far fewer numbers than white gentiles, Jews feel that whites may one day renege on the equal partnership and use their numbers to gain dominance over Jews, as sort of happened in Russia. (3) Jewish appetite for power and control is just insatiable regardless of any other factor. Just like Harvey Weinstein had to grab all those women and just like Anthony Weiner had to keep sending his penis pictures to so many women, Jews can’t help themselves.
So, when people like Taylor offer equal partnership, Jews see no point in negotiating. Also, people like Taylor are now so powerless that they are in no position to negotiate. While all the Zionists who support the violent policies of Israel get to run the media and all the think-tanks, Jared Taylor can’t even keep his Twitter account. And while AIPAC rallies calling on all US politicians to support Israel’s brutal occupation of West Bank are lavishly funded and held at huge stadiums, American Renaissance conferences could barely secure a venue. So, Taylor’s fig leaf to the Jews means NOTHING to the Jews. They see him as a defeated man and are out to silence him totally.
Now, if people like Taylor held the real power in America and if they offered equal partnership to Jews on the premise that Jews must be nice to whites, Jews may take up the offer strategically to bid for time as they keep gaining in power to the point where they can finally dethrone and ‘discredit’ anything associated with whiteness. It’s like Jews in the Old American South arrived at a compromise with the Plantation system, and Jews in Russia pretend to go along with Putin while looking for ways to eventually steer Russia into the pocket of Jewish ownership.
Anyway, Taylor's offer is meaningless because Jews already have the power. Why would they take up on the Taylor Plan when they have nothing to gain from him? What do the likes of Taylor have to offer to Jews who got Wall Street, Ivy Leagues, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Big Media, Deep State, High-Tech, and Biggest Law firms? Now, there is a chance that Jews may have to come to the negotiating table in the future if something really BIG happens. Suppose things get so bad for whites that there are violent upheavals in both the US and EU. Suppose the current ruling elites are toppled from power, and a New White Power emerges to take center stage. In that case, Jews better pray that there might still be some whites who are sympathetic to them.
So, one could argue that Taylor’s Offer to Jews is less about the Now than about the Later when Jews might find themselves in big trouble. Or even if whites do totally lose out to Jews and globalism, Jews may face more dangers from non-whites, especially Muslims in the EU. If indeed the EU becomes heavily Muslim and if these Muslims become ever more violent toward whomever they regard as ‘Zionist’, then Jews better hope that whites will side with them and protect them from violent Muslims and Africans.
Anyway, like it or not, the Jewish elites do have a powerful vision of uniting the whole world under the glob-dome of Political Correctness as virtue-vanity ideology, Pop Culture as the only culture, Homomania as the new religion, US militarism as the sole hammer, and Wall Street finance as the final arbiter of all things. The unholy trinity of Jewish Money, Jungle Boogie, and Justice Junkies. And masses of sheeple addicted to celebrity culture. White females to become meat for Jews & Negroes, and white males to become sappy cucks like CucKen Burns.
Yes, it’s all shallow and crass but nevertheless powerful, enthralling, and mesmerizing because it is so pervasive and relentless in fueling vice, vanity, and (delusion of) virtue as a single combo of ecstasy and rapture, best exemplified by the hysterics of Homomania, the celebrations of which convey the excesses of hedonism, conceits of narcissism, and arrogance of moralism. The vanity of vice is the new virtue.
Of course, it’s all ludicrous, but the power of the electronic media, monopoly of terminology, and fulsome pageantry override the senses that render clear thinking almost impossible for so many people. Because the power of media amplifies images and sounds that have such spellbinding impact on so many people, the effect is sufficient to win over and hold most people... in the way that Christmas lights and celebrations are enough to convince children that Christmas is so wonderful even though they know nothing of the religious foundation of the holiday. It’s like Las Vegas, and its endless cascades of lights. It’s not just the prospect of gambling that draws people there. They feel alive, like a ball inside a pinball machine being bounced around endlessly regardless of rhyme or reason.
To be sure, the very nature of globalist power is its biggest vulnerability. Because it is so false, phony, and degenerate, it can only be kept alive by endless supercharged voltage of fun, frills, and fortune. In Old America prior to the rise of electronic media, many families were isolated and had little, but they found real meaning in the family, community, Church, and patriotism. But all those are gone, so what is there but bogus visions and values? Since bogusness is shallow and stupid, it can only be sold with a lot of glitz and shine. It’s like Bread and Circuses of Ancient Rome. Once the state couldn’t provide them anymore, there was nothing to go on. True value has meaning even when ‘unplugged’. It’s like a genuinely worthy song has value even without all the layered effects of electronica. In contrast, many current hits have very little content without the production values that just add a lot of bells and whistles. It’s like a dish with lots of sauce but hardly any meat. Still, as long as the globalist elites have the juice to keep the mojo flowing, billions of people all around the world will remain captivated by the kumbaya.
Against such power, Taylor’s arguments may be sound and factual but are ultimately ineffective. It’s like facts and data sound boring, insignificant, and irrelevant when uttered between two giant speakers blasting words and music that incite the masses into chants and convulsions.
Rappers yammer nonsensical crap, but why do they have such power over so many people, even those who are well-educated and well-read? It’s because rappers are thunderous and hurl fire and brimstone to the beat. Their way isn’t to argue or discuss a point. They command and demand respect.
The thing is, before humans are creatures of reason, they are emotional and sensual beings, and the reason loses out to the rhythm. Consider the success of the utterly stupid Disney revamping of STAR WARS into yet another franchise. The sheer power of hype makes the myth live.
Whatever his faults, Richard Spencer understands that a vision, however corrupt and tawdry, has to be countered by another vision. This takes boldness and a leap of imagination. Would communism have collapsed in the Soviet Union and neighboring Communist nations if the Capitalist West hadn’t existed? After all, as inefficient and underdeveloped Eastern-European communist nations were, they were still far more advanced than nearly all of the non-white world and the Third World. So, if the US and Western Europe hadn’t existed, many people living under communism would have thought they have the best system in the world... just like the Byzantine Empire, being cut off from developments in Western Europe, thought it had the best of everything in comparison to the nearest neighboring powers. And prior to the challenge posed by the West, the Chinese were confident that they had the best of all worlds. Their own vision of things was enough. It was when the more advanced vision of the West challenged the Chinese vision of civilization that the whole system began to gradually but surely unravel, eventually gaining steam whereupon the nation came to be racked by one revolution after another. Would the people of Romania have stood up to Ceausescu if their only vision of Romania had been the one pushed by the state? Weren’t they inspired by what they heard of the world outside Romania and communism, one of freedom and enterprise and ambition and success? It is the counter-vision that undermines the current-vision.
In understanding this, Spencer is onto something. But if Jared Taylor’s view is too short-sighted and factual, Spencer’s vision is too grandiose and delusional. When the West must struggle to save itself and survive, does it make sense to dream of colonizing Africa once again... or flying off to Mars and stars for interstellar colonies? Maybe such is in the cards centuries from now, but white people today need to fix their vision on matters that are most essential. After all, if the West is lost to the darkies, there won’t be the future of great science and technology. Spencer might argue that whites being a majority is not important, because, after all, Jews are a minority yet have so much power. And Brits ruled all of India with a small imperial caste. But what eventually happened to the Brits in India? They got overwhelmed by sheer numbers and got booted out once nationalism and mass political consciousness got universalized. As for the dominance of Jewish minority elite, it's possible only because Jews have white gentiles to serve them and support them. Could Jews have gained such power if they’d stayed out of white world and set up communities in Africa, Asia, Middle East, and Latin America? Blacks would have just raided and raped them. Asians would have ignored them. Muslims would have severely proscribed their freedom. And Latin Americans would have been too lax and corrupt to provide a system in which Jews could thrive with assurance of Rule of Law and Private Property. It is no accident that Jews gained the most power among white people. So, Jewish power depends on white support. This was the case in South Africa too. Jews grew very rich there because they were protected by the white Anglo-Boer support system. But when blacks took over and the white support system dramatically weakened, Jews found their place in South Africa far less certain, which is why Jews are deeply worried about black and Hindu(who compete with Jewish diamond merchants) condemnation of ‘white monopoly capital’. Given that Jewish supremacy depends so much on the white support system, one would think that Jews wouldn’t be so eager to keep pushing for more invasion-immigration and Diversity that will diminish white power, in which case Jews will have less of a white support system to rely on.
But, the Jewish idea is that Immigration and Diversity should be pushed at least to the extent that white majority power is broken. In other words, Jews want to live in a nation with lots of whites but one in which whites cannot form a majority to block whatever agenda Jews want. Now, shouldn't Jews worry about non-whites working as a new majority against Jewish power? No. Why not? Because non-whites will be too diverse — blacks, Mexicans, Asians, Hindus, Muslims, etc. — to agree on anything and unite into an effective force. Also, even though non-whites will supply the votes(almost entirely for more immigration and more gibs), they will not get to control the agenda since most of them don’t have the means to reach elite positions, and the only ones that do, the Asians, tend to be pretty docile and obedient to the dominant Narrative and Agenda. Non-whites will supply the votes to keep Jewish elites in power, but it will be the Jewish elites who make all the important decisions. And if non-whites get restless, Jews can always use the power of media to direct non-white ire at 'white privilege'.
Anyway, the Vision is the key. Whites must be instilled with a passion so powerful that makes them feel the world is intolerable UNLESS their vision is realized. This vision must essentially be national since white people need to respect the national visions of other peoples as well.
In big things, there must be mutual respect and reciprocity. The notion of one people or nation ruling or controlling the whole world will lead to more disasters. One must have a passionate vision, but one must also have a sense of limits.
Richard Spencer thinks white people have some 'Faustian' destiny to rule, but this is total misreading of history. So much of the world was once easy to conquer because (1) The West was so advanced in arms and technology and (2) the Non-West societies lacked national consciousness. So, when whites conquered a territory and took out its elites, most natives didn't care because their concept of power was something that happened above. They saw themselves as subjects than citizens. So, what did it matter if they were subjects of local power or foreign power? Subjects are meant to obey. So, if foreign imperialists took out local elites, it was the war between the 'gods' that had little to do with most native folks.
That was then, this is now. All the world have gained development in modern technology, and all peoples around the world have national consciousness. India even has nukes. What would happen if the British tried to invade India or China today? Even the lone superpower like the US got badly bogged down in a third-rate power like Iraq.
People need vision, but every vision must have limits. The world is not a STAR WARS movie where people get to play Darth Vader. On the other hand, Taylor's C-3PO-like factualism doesn't quite inspire.