|Tiepolo: Abraham and Isaac|
But if this the nature of God, the one and only Deity of all things and all times, then why would He have invested so much of His time and energy with a certain tribe? (It’d be like the FBI diverting its resources to track down the insipid troll who tormented Kurt Eichenwald on Twitter. Doesn’t the FBI have better things to do? It goes to show justice is never blind. Organs of the Law prioritize certain cases over others depending on which groups have the clout.) If a rich man had a billion dollars, would he care about one of his many dollars over the others? If God is so great and mighty, why would His destiny be affixed to the travails of some desert tribe? And, consider the man with whom God made the Covenant, Abram who was renamed Abraham. What was so great or notable about Abraham that he(and his descendants) deserved such a blessing from the one and only master of all the universe? Imagine if you’re the lord of all animals(that ever were, are, and will be) but choose a bunch of rabbits or rats as your ‘chosen’ creatures. But why would you do that? If you have lordship over all whales, elephants, lions, tigers, bears, wombats, kangaroos, sharks, dolphins, gorillas, rhinos, and etc, why would you favor a bunch of rabbits or rats as your special breed? And why would you give them special protection over others? Abraham may have been a good man — or better than most — , but he hardly exhibited greatness. So, why would God choose him & his tribe and bless them with great promise, power, and wealth? If God’s domain were limited to Earth alone, His special concern for Jews might be somewhat understandable — like a parent having a favorite child — , but as God happens to be creator, lord, and master over all things for all times, it means even ALL OF mankind is insignificant in His overall design. So, why would His fate be so closely tied to some tribe, half of whose members are either swindlers, comedians, and/or degenerates?
Was this a fair transaction and bargain betwee God and Jews? Which side gains more from the Covenant? If God is the owner and ruler of everything, what can Jews possibly do for Him? Even if Jews accumulated all the worldly wealth and offered it to God, it would be a pittance in the eyes of God who owns all the universe. It’d be like a homeless person offering his pennies, half-smoked cigarettes, and stained gumdrops to a billionaire. All the wealth on Earth would be nothing to God, the master and ruler of all the galaxies. So, there is nothing that Jews can do for God. Whatever Jews offer to God, God already has. Besides, if everything in the cosmos belongs to God, what Jews offer to God is His to begin with. Jews would only be taking something from God-owned world and offering it to God. It’d be like a kid buying a gift for his parents with allowance money given to him by his parents. So, God has no need for Jews. In contrast, Jews have everything to gain by being chosen by God. They would have protection and favoritism of the one and only God, the greatest power in the universe. Therefore, it’s a game in which Jews win, God loses. Jews get everything from God, God gets nothing from Jews.
|HOUSE OF GAMES - David Mamet|
But this Jewish devotion to God is really useless to God. Why would God need such devotion from Jews or any other people when He has everything? He has all the power, matter, energy, truth, time, and wisdom of the universe. Jews could do nothing for Him. God is God regardless of what Jews or any people do, say, or believe. It’s like a person is a person regardless of what a colony of ants think. Suppose an ant comes to you and says its colony will be devoted to you. Okay, but what good will it do you? You have your life, your house, your wealth, and your happiness. And those things have nothing to do with some dinky dirt colony full of stupid ants. Whether the ant colony worship you or not, you are you and you have all your stuff. No matter how slavishly the ants try to worship and serve you, there isn’t a thing they can do for you. But, suppose these ants are tricky and persuade you that, in return for their undying loyalty to you, it’d be awful decent of you to return the favor and offer them protection(from all other critters) as the ‘chosen’ among all wild organisms. So, what is the nature of this bargain? You can actually do substantive things for the ants because a human is many times more powerful than a bunch of ants(whose colony can be destroyed a child’s foot or urine). You can offer them food, you can destroy critters that might harm the ants, you can build roof over them so that the colony won’t be soaked with rain, and etc. So, even though the ant narrative says they are slaves to you, you’ve really become a slave to them. After all, their supposed slavishness to you offers you nothing, but your favors for them make a huge difference.
But seen in another way, it is God who is placed in a trap and bound ever closer to the Jews. After all, if God goes through with His demand, He will still have His power but not the glory as just and righteous God. He will still be the most powerful and the one & only God of the physical universe, but He would make Himself a stranger in the moral universe. He could be reduced to a nihilistic cosmic gangster who delights in the murder of an innocent & helpless child. Thus, He would be a God to fear and obey but not one to love and honor. (Also, there is vanity in the conception of all gods, and they naturally want to be worshiped by people of quality. If God had made humans dog-like, He would have had devoted followers but also clone-like dolts and yes-men. God wants to be worshiped by People of Quality, just like a famous artist or actor wants to be admired by intelligent critics & scholars than by saliva-drooling fans. The problem is, the more ‘quality’ a people are, more difficult is to earn their admiration and devotion. So, the problem of Judaism is God has the following of a very intelligent people but their very intelligence often puts them at odds with God. God wants total obedience from a people capable of total freedom. A great contradiction.) So, by testing His power and Abraham’s loyalty, the result was Abraham’s moral victory over Him and, furthermore, His need to make amends to Abraham and his tribe. After all, Abraham was a man of love for his son and for God. He wanted to raise his son and worship God. There was moral consistency in his fatherly devotion to his son and his sincere devotion to whom he believed to be a good & wise God. So, when God commanded Abraham to kill his son, it was God who was the violator of the Covenant. He ordered Abraham to do something horrible and unseemly. Abraham’s soul was divided. He wanted to protect his son, and he wanted to serve God. But God, the great Being who’d given him the gift of a son, ordered him to kill that very son for no apparent reason than to prove his loyalty to God. This great moral contradiction meant that things could never be the same between Abraham and God if the order was carried through. It would mean Abraham proved his loyalty but to a God who is amoral, capricious, and unhinged. So, in order for God to be both masterful and honorable, He had no choice but to nullify His own order. So, it was God who was caught in a trap and reversed His order to save His reputation. And so He did. But it didn’t end there. Even though God has proven His goodness by allowing Abraham to keep his son, He still has to answer for the fact that He made called for blood sacrifice in the first place. The fact remains that He ordered Abraham to do something that no human should be made to do. The moral equation favors Abraham over God since Abraham didn’t want to kill Isaac but willed himself to do so in loyalty to or in fear of God. So, Abraham was right on both counts. His moral sense abhorred the terrible request. But his spiritual devotion remained true to God to the very last; or he understood that he didn’t have a choice since it was an-offer-he-couldn’t-refuse. After all, if God is all-powerful, disobedient Abraham could be robbed of everyone and everything dear, not just Isaac. So, if only to save the rest of the tribe, he had no choice but to offer what God demanded.
From the other side of the equation, God made a horrific request of a good man who’d already proved his devotion to God many times over. And even though God reversed the order and allowed Abraham to keep the kid, He’s confronted with two conclusions that bind His power. First, He discovers a power beyond godly power. Morality is bigger than God Himself. So, even though God has the power to transgress any moral law, so doing will remove the righteous crown from His head. So, God, despite His power and greatness, lost His nerves and called off the sacrifice. The greatest being in the universe got cold feet. He couldn’t go through what He Himself had ordered, whereas Abraham was willing to go through with it.
Second, He is faced with the silent truth that He did Abraham wrong and has to make amends. Abraham had long ago proven his loyalty to God in accordance to the Covenant, but his loyalty was tested once again and in such horrible manner. Also, God, despite His claim of being Lord of the all that is, came across as insecure and neurotic in His need to ascertain and confirm Abraham’s loyalty to Him. It’s like a jealous husband who is never sure that his wife is faithful to him despite her seemingly impeccable fidelity.
So, in a way, the story of God and Abraham is more the story of God falling into the trap of the Jews than vice versa. According to the narrative, God ordered Abraham to bind Isaac to a rock and slay him, and Abraham had no choice but to obey God. But in the process, it was God’s power that became bound to the bedrock of morality. It was God’s nihilistic tendencies that were sacrificed, whereupon God finds Himself bound to the Jewish tribe — like Atlas bound with the sky and Prometheus chained to a cliff — because its founder proved his utmost loyalty and worthiness before God. And yet, the great irony is Abraham proved his utmost loyalty in a deed that God simply couldn’t see through to the end if He were to retain His reputation as a good God. Abraham proved his utmost ‘goodness’ to God through his unstinting resolve to carry out God’s order, and God salvaged His glory by reversing His own command. So, in a way, everyone wins and everyone loses. But given the power imbalance between Abraham and God, the latter had more to lose.
|George C. Scott as Abraham in THE BIBLE by John Huston|
According to Jewish monotheism, there is only one true God, and all others are false gods. According to Americanism, there is only true nation, the United States, and all others are false nations. As such, America must be universal Rome-Israel-Mecca to all peoples in the literal or figurative sense. Peoples everywhere should aspire to abandon their own nations, make the journey to America, abandon their ancient identities for the superior American identity, and raise their kids in a culture of amnesia to grow up to be ideal consumer-hedonists. As for those who aren’t able to come to the US, they must do everything to turn their own nations ersatz-americas as much as possible. Instant gratification and immediacy of meaning — the hallmark of Pop Culture — should trump all other considerations. So, America is the only destination for emigration or the only model to follow. Margaret Thatcher once said, "America is philosophy, Europe is history." But (Jewish)American-style globalism extinguishes all memories and cuts off all connective roots to the past. For religion there is homomania. For meaning, there is Jew-worship and Holocaust-cult for all humanity even though most peoples had nothing to do with World War II and the Holocaust. And for culture and mythos, there is rap music and Hollywood comic-book-blockbusters. For ‘art’(among those with more discriminating tastes), there is American TV shows touted as ‘mature’ entertainment in this supposedly ‘true golden age of TV’.
So, does this mean that Europe, like the US, is now about ‘philosophy’ than ‘history’? Actually, that would be too kind as Americanism, in the current incarnation, is more about propaganda than principles. Perhaps, there was something genuinely philosophical about Americanism when Thatcher made her remark, but as practiced today, it is little more than False Advertising for Jewish Supremacism. The New Americanism is about hysteria, mania, and fashion, a constant barrage of sensationalist distractions to obfuscate Jewish designs on the whole world. In simplest terms, America is a Mass Cult of Ephemera contrived to serve the shifting interests of the GLOB(globalist masters). Indeed, it’s to Jewish advantage to keep the rules of Americanism as loose as possible because real principles will bind the rulers to their own rules, just like morality tied God’s hands to do the right thing by Abraham and spare Isaac. Jews don’t want to be bound to any law or principle when it comes to their insatiable lust for more wealth and power. So, if More-Jewish-Power calls for the killing of 100,000s of Iraq children, Americanism must be remolded to justify that. (But after having killed all those innocent Arab/Muslim kids, Jews feigned compassion by aiding Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo, a maneuver to their advantage since Serbia was backed by Russia.) Vaguer the meaning of Americanism, greater leeway for Jews to play fast and loose to bolster and maximize their own power. So, Jews, who insisted on the separation of church and state in the past(as an iron principle), are now saying the US must allow special privileges for Muslims and Sikhs in schools and other public places/institutions in the name of Diversity. Especially if the US is to invade & intrude into the affairs of the Muslim World(for the sake of Israel and Zionist hegemony), it needs to justify its act of aggression and interference with displays of ‘good will’, ‘compassion’, and ‘tolerance’.
Was Americanism always thus? Of course not. Even though the Founding of the United States had an element of universal idealism, there was nothing to imply that the US must become a Universal Nation, let alone the one-and-only template for whole world, a concept all-too-cynically employed by Jews to justify their global meddling expand Jewish power — Americanism and Homomania are proxies and fronts to mask Jewish supremacist-imperialism. Besides, for the first hundred years, the priority of the nascent republic was to defend & sustain itself and then wrest more land from the indigenous folks via the westward expansion. It was only when the entire continent was claimed and settled that America began to vie for a place-in-the-sun as a world power. But even then, America saw itself as one of the several great powers with no special right or authority to lord over others. It was really with the devastation of World War I that America emerged as a semblance of the most powerful nation on earth. With Germany defeated, with Russia caught up in the throes of revolution, and with victorious Britain and France set back by tragic losses of life and wealth, it was only natural that unscathed America would emerge as the premier power. Even so, WWI elevated Japan’s role in the Pacific, Great Britain and France still retained their vast world empires, and communist Russia was re-emerging as an industrial power from the bloody revolution. Also, as yet unfamiliar with the notion of America-as-a-superpower, most Americans looked inward and had no interest in taking on the role of global hegemon during the inter-war years.
Or maybe US expansion was more the result of the breakup of the British and French empires. With the Third World no longer under the thumb of European powers, the US was tempted to step in and play the role of new boss or ‘policeman/salesman of the world’.
Even so, the notion that the US is the one-and-only true model for the entire world and that all national borders — except Israel’s — must be dissolved to facilitate mass migrations of peoples is a relatively new development. It is globalism, a radical departure from the internationalism — nations learning to cooperate and get along peacefully — of the postwar order. By massive movements of peoples across all nations — but especially headed to the West — , globalism’s agenda is to weaken and wipe out all distinct national identities and interests. So, what will replace national identities and national interests? After all, people need to feel as members of something, part of a community. Once all peoples are de-nationalized and deracinated, are they all to become ‘American’(as citizen or imitator)? This can be achieved by coming to America or by ‘Americanizing’ their own nations with Hollywood, MTV, Homomania, rap music, and PC. This globalism is really the brainchild of Jewish supremacists who loathe all nationalisms except their own in Israel and Judenia, Jewish networks of power-centers around the world. After all, nationalism commands that the elites of every nation are obliged to represent & defend the identity & heritage of their own people against the intrusions & interferences of other nations and imperial powers. For Jews, this means that every gentile nation must prioritize its own identity and interests against World Jewry that controls globalism.
Jews want elites of every gentile nation to serve Jewish supermacism than represent and defend their own people. Jews like Angela Merkel and hate Viktor Orban because Merkel serves Jewish supremacists against Germans whereas Orban serves Hungarians against Jewish supremacists.
But Jews target not only gentile elites for conversion but gentiles masses so that deracinated mobs will pressure their own elites to ditch nationalism and adopt Diversity, Homomania, and Globorgy-ism. This has happened already in Ireland where the majority voted for ‘gay marriage’ and, being addicted to Afromania in sports-music-sex, demand that Ireland welcome more demographic imperialism to erase Ireland as a distinctly European and Celtic civilization. So many Irish now want Ireland to become a St. Patrick’s Day celebration in America where anyone can be ‘Irish for a day’. Ireland has become just a Shamrock Puerto Rico of globo-America. Globalism is about the Puerto-Ricanization of the World. Because Jews control the academia, they infect elite minds all over the world with their brand of PC. And because Jews control mass media, Hollywood, and music industry(and much of the internet which they manipulate to favor their brand of ‘fake news), they’ve been able to sway countless gentiles from top to bottom with their globalist agenda — the Americanization of the World. Jews hate Trump’s talk of nationalism-over-globalism because, without US hegemony, the New-Jew-World-Order cannot be sustained. Jewish supremacist power piggybacks on the back of American might-and-muscle. Without the US as sole hegemon, nations of the world will revert to the national-sovereignty mode, and that means it will be more difficult for globalist Jews to penetrate and take over. As rich and powerful as Jews are, they need the obedience & cooperation of US muscle to do their bidding around the world.
|Katy Perry's 'Murica|
The only constant will be the Rule by Jewish Elites who will go on playing the game of ‘divide-and-rule’ between Settled Americans and New Americans. So, if Jews now encourage Mexicans to take over from whites as the New Americans, in the future Jews will use Chinese, Hindus, and Muslims against Mexicans. The Jew giveth, the Jew taketh away.
If America is the literal nation and if ‘America’ is the proposition of what Jews want it to be, "America" is the Jewish supremacist project to turn the entire world into reflection of ‘America’. So, every corner of the world, with the exception of Israel, must be turned into "America".
Likewise, Jews would have us believe (1) America is the greatest power in the world and (2) Jews are its most loyal & patriotic servants carrying out its true mission. But as 2% of America, there’s only so much Jews can do for America. Jews also say Israel is the most loyal and committed ally of the US. Because Israel is so devoted to America, it seems only right and fair for the US to return the favor and bestow gifts on the Jewish State. But in truth, Israel isn’t crucial to the US at all. If Israel were to disappear from the Earth, the US will do just fine, and maybe even better as one of the key obstacles to good relations with Muslim nations would be gone forever. Indeed, the notion of Israel as an outpost of ‘Western Civilization’ defending Europe and America is laughable. If anything, all the Wars for Israel concocted by Zionists and Neocons have destabilized the Middle East & North Africa and set off massive non-white migrant-invasions of Europe, a horror that is being aided by Israelis. So, the moral claims of the covenant between the US and Israel are fraudulent. Jews would have us believe Israel is so loyal to the US and indispensable for its well-being, but in fact, all the favors flow totally from the US to Israel. Without the US, Israel would be vulnerable and exposed. But without Israel, the US would do just fine.
But just as Jews subtly rewrote the meaning of God, they rewrote the meaning of America. If indeed God is the master of the universe, there’s no reason for Him to be bound to some ridiculous tribe. Imagine some super-rich and super-handsome guy(who can have all the women in the world) being persuaded to stick with a nasty homely woman. She would be getting a lot from him, but what would he be getting from her? It’d be like Clint Eastwood, a world famous movie-star, being stuck with the crazy woman in PLAY MISTY FOR ME.
Likewise, given that the US had already developed into a rich and powerful nation without substantial input from Jews(who arrived in substantial numbers only in the late 19th century and early 20th century) — furthermore, Anglos everywhere amply proved that they can build successful economies on their own without Jews — , there was no need for the US to take in Jews or be bound to their destiny. Despite Jewish claims, the US would have done just fine even if not a single Jew had set foot on American soil. It’s like most nations of Western Europe following WWII were virtually Jew-free, but they did just fine without them. If anything, European postwar decline can be traced to the 60s generation that fell under the sway of radical Jewish ideas. Consider how Sweden would have done better without any advice from Jews. Also, the May 68 fiasco in France was led by Jews.
Anyway, just like ancient Jews disingenuously convinced God that His glory and grand design must be bound to the fate of Jews, modern Jews slyly hustled and conned America into believing that it needs Jews to serve and fulfill its ‘true’ meaning and purpose. So, God ended up doing a whole bunch of things for Jews(who never did Him any good in return), and the US ended up doing everything for Jews(who hardly reciprocated in kind). In both cases, passive/aggressive Jews feigned as loyal servants while pulling every trick in the book to make themselves the true master in the equation. Posing as eternal objects of pity supplicating at the feet of the great noble power, be it God or America, Jews feel deserving as the main beneficiaries of favors and protections granted by the ultimate power. Furthermore, Jews, playing their role of the most-tragic-and-wise-victims-of-history to the hilt, play on the moral vanity of the great power that also wants moral sanctification. Given the moral-and-spiritual capital of the Jews based on the Bible Narrative and the Holocaust Cult(the only thing that finally neutralized and overcame Christian ‘antisemitism’), what holier people than the Jews to offer benediction to a great power? Just like Abraham played on God’s moral vanity, Jews have played on America’s. If Jews say America is so great, it must be great since no people are as tragic, wise, and holy as the Jews. But just as God, in exchange for moral flattery from Abraham’s tribe, felt compelled to favor Jews over all other peoples, America, in exchange for the Jewish blessing, feels obliged to live up to Jewish ‘hope’ and ‘dream’ of what America should really be. (In a way, the rise of Christianity can be seen as God’s attempt to liberate Himself from Jews whom He couldn’t stand any longer. Perhaps, God figured that if He must do favors for pitiable creatures, why not for all of mankind than for pesky Jews? On the other hand, we are not being entirely fair to Jews. After all, God wouldn’t exist without the Jews, His creator. So, in a way, it is only right that Jews should really be the master in the equation, however disingenuously, since man created gods, not the other way around. So, if God is the one-and-only God and the sole master of the universe, He owes it to the power of Jewish imagination and thought. As God doesn’t exist except as an idea in the minds of men, His power is wholly dependent on what people think of Him. He is the Lord ONLY IF there are people to believe in Him as such. So, as long as God belonged only to Jews, Jews had the power to destroy God. If Jews were gone, God was also gone since ONLY Jews believe in Him. Jews could also finish off God simply by no longer believing in Him. So, His insurance for survival was through Christianity in case Jews were wiped off the face of the Earth or wiped Him out of their minds in favor of secularism or the Golden Calf. That way, it doesn’t matter what Jews do or think. Others will believe in Him even if Jews don’t, and that will ensure His survival as the idea of the one-and-only God, the master of all that is. It should also be noted that the relation between America and Jews has been a complicated one. While the US would still be a great, rich, and powerful nation even if not a single Jew had set foot on America — whereas Jews would be lost without gentiles — , it’s inarguable that, along with people of Anglo-or-Northern-European stock, Jews have made the most contribution to America in terms of wealth-creation, science, technology, medicine, literature, music, cinema, and ideas. True, Jews did a lot of bad things, and the current Jewish Globalist Agenda is downright wicked, but the positive contributions by Jews have been inestimable.)