Friday, August 10, 2018

Slavocaust, a Great Tragedy of the 20th Century, and It Continues to this Day — On the Aryan and Semitic War on Slavic Peoples and Cultures

Slavocaust from the Semites. The Great Famine of the 1930s. Stalin and Jewish Bolsheviks implemented Forced-Collectivization that led to 7 million deaths in the Soviet Union. 3.5 million were in Ukraine alone, mostly Christian Slavs. As Jews were urban-dwellers and safely ensconced in elite positions, they evaded the brunt of the famine and ate well while millions of Slavs across the country faced death by starvation. At the time, the Jewish-owned New York Times ran articles denying the existence of the famines, and the reporter, the homosexual Walter Duranty, was awarded with the Pulitzer Prize for one of the greatest Fake News stories in journalism.
Slavocaust from the Aryans. Nazi Germans invade Russia with genocidal plans to wipe out tens of millions of Slavs to be replaced with German farmers. Had the Germans won the war and carried out the Slavocaust in full measure, Russian Slavs would have been turned into slaves or slaughtered like cattle. Unlike Jewish Bolsheviks who hid their ethnic animus with socialist ideology, Germans were blatant in their contempt for Eastern Slavs as untermensch who must make way for superior Germans.

20th Century was no stranger to tragedies. There were the two great World Wars. There was the mass killings of Armenians, the Shoah, Nanking Massacre, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Rwandan Genocide, the Killing Fields of Cambodia, Mao’s famines and campaign against culture, wars in Vietnam and Algeria, and many more. But perhaps one that has been overlooked could broadly be called the Slavocaust, or Slavic-Holocaust. Now, the tragedies that fall into this category have been studied and discussed — the Great Famine in Ukraine under Bolshevism is one of the most well-known example — as individual events, but perhaps what we need is a more comprehensive overview of a pattern of events that could be summed up as a War on Slavs. When we ponder the entire forest than fixate on individual trees, a pattern emerges. One such pattern may explain the particularly tragic history of the Slavs, especially Russians/Ukrainians. And in a very real way, the animus behind Slavocaust of the 20th century is still with us, especially as so much of the world is under the hegemony of the Empire of Judea or EOJ. Jewish hatred of Slavs is now near-genocidal.

The main pattern that emerges from Eastern Europe and Russia in the 20th century concerns the Jewish(Semitic) and Germanic(Aryan) Wars of Enslavement and Extermination against the Slavic Peoples. Why did Germans and Jews play key roles in this? This seems all the odder considering that, especially from 1933 to 1945, the Semites and Aryans were the fiercest enemies in the world. To be sure, there was a supporting cast of characters in the Slavocaust by Anglos, British and American. And to a lesser extent, Japan that was used, prior to WWII and during the Cold War, as an collaborator against Russia.

Now, I don’t mean to suggest that Slavs have been some pure-as-snow saints of history. As we all know, Slavic history is filled with warriors, conquerors, ruthless tyrants, imperialists, and lunatics. Russia got so big because it conquered other peoples, and it’s understandable why many peoples, including non-Russian Slavs, developed hostilities toward Russians as overbearing invaders and despoilers. People are people, and Slavs could be as good or bad as anyone(though perhaps Negroes are one race that defies imagination in terms of morality; DNA tells us that all of humanity could roughly be divided between Sub-Saharan Africans and Everyone Else).

That said, geography condemned the Slavs(especially those further to the East) to a rather troubled place in history. Like Southern Europe — Balkans and Spain, Italy, & Portugal — , the Slavic territories were exposed to non-European invaders. Spain came under Moorish rule for several centuries. Parts of the Balkans came under Turkish rule(though some may include Turkey as part of Europe). As Slavic peoples lived in the Eastern territories, they were the first Europeans to be ravaged when the Mongols moved westward from the Gobi steppes. And Russians were constantly at war with the Turkic Muslim peoples. For nearly three centuries, Russians lived under the Mongol yoke. And with the Muslims of Turkic regions and Central Asia, the Russian gave as good as they got(but they ‘got’ a lot). According to Andrei Tarkovsky in THE MIRROR, Russia played a christ-like role in European history. If not for Russia as sacrificial bulwark, the West could have been flooded with the Mongol Horde, and then, who knows what the history of Christendom and Europe might have been. Weakened by threats from North Africa, Turkic peoples, and Mongols, maybe the European pageant would have been quashed... like the glory of Greece was lost long ago when invasions upon invasions left only skeletons of Hellenic glory.

And yet, it was precisely because Russia underwent that ‘christ-like’ sacrificial role that it came to be despised than appreciated by the West. Instead of gratitude toward Slavs for serving as the demographic brunt against the Mongols, many in the West came to see them as whites tainted with Asiatic blood and poisoned with Oriental Despotism. They were seen as the lesser Europeans, if European at all.
And even in the Modern Era, Russian aristocrats came to regard their people in a condescending, even contemptuous, manner. If Russian rulers like Ivan the Terrible were infected with the virus of 'Oriental Despotism' and ruled like a ‘Khan’, the later Russian rulers held themselves aloof from the Slavic rabble; they took special pride in their ‘western' cultivation. The famed Catherine the Great was actually a German. And Russian elites who modeled themselves on Western attitudes and manners snubbed their own national folk. Given that only a sliver of privileged Russians had the means to be educated in the West, it led to a widening divide between the elites and the masses. Russian royalty married with non-Russians, especially the Germans. Many preferred to speak French than Russian, considered as a barbarian tongue. These elites weren't ‘oriental despotist’ but despotic just the same because they turned up their noses at Russian commoners as semi-barbarian louts and boors munching on raw potatoes and mired in superstition. So, whether Russian elites followed the Oriental model or the Western model, they generally disdained their folks. In Oriental Despotic mode, the masses were seen as obedient cattle. In Western Enlightenment mode, the masses were seen as ignorant dummies. Peter the Great was a westernizing modernizer, but he treated his people as chattel in the building of St. Petersburg. Catherine the Great patronized Western artists and thinkers but only reinforced the institution of serfdom. Enlightenment was for the washed and perfumed.

Looking further back into history, we find more reasons as to why the West generally came to disdain the Slavs. Christianity spread to Western and Northern Europe before it moved deep into Slavic territory. So, the Christian West once regarded Slavic peoples as unredeemed pagans. For this reason, the Christian West's prohibition of slavery(among Christians) didn't apply to pagan Slavs who were regarded as lowly heathens. The fact that the term ‘slave’ derives from ‘Slav’ is sure indication of the massive scale of the slave trade involving Slavs. Christian West and Jews sold millions of Slavs to North Africa and Near East. For much of Western and Central European history, the Slavs were regarded as barbarians, the last ones to be civilized and converted to Christianity. Western Europeans looked upon Slavs like the English once regarded the Scottish or how today’s urban yuppie elites feel about rural white folks in the South. (It’s no wonder that Andrei Konchalovsky had such rapport with the subject of rural white folks in SHY PEOPLE set in Louisiana.)
Furthermore, Russian Slavs always seemed to bet on the wrong horse. When Russians finally adopted Christianity, they chose the Eastern Orthodox Faith than Catholicism. (Certain Slavic groups became Catholics, drawing them closer to the more advanced West.) At the time, the two great centers of Christianity were Rome and Constantinople. Russians bet on the everlasting glory of Constantinople, but it would fall into decline and eventually fall to the Turks whereas the Roman Church would grow bigger and stronger, until it was confronted with the ‘heresy’ of Protestantism. Even though the wars between the Catholics and Protestants were many times more violent than anything between Catholics and Orthodox, the two great Western Churches arrived at a way to tolerate and even cooperate with one another. Besides, even if in opposition, Protestantism was a direct outgrowth of Catholicism. It was all-in-the-family. In contrast, the Orthodox Church evolved in a universe all its own. So, even though Western Europe and Russia were both Christian, there was a cultural-spiritual gulf that could never be closed.

In a way, the prelude to the Slavocaust of the 20th Century was the Napoleonic invasion of Russia. Not only did it lead to the deaths of millions of Russians under an emperor who emerged from the French Revolution but it led to resentment against Russia among radicals and progressives in the coming years.
In one way, Russia was appreciated as the savior that finally broke the back of the increasingly aggressive and arrogant French Empire. Defeat of France meant liberation all across Europe. And yet, in yrs to come, many radicals came to revere Napoleon as a romantic figure who'd once nearly united all of Europe under Enlightenment values. So, from this viewpoint, Russia was not so much the savior of Europe from French domination but the reactionary ditch that destroyed the wheels of revolution. After all, following the downfall of the Napoleonic Order, most of Europe came under aristocratic rule for the next hundred years before it all came tumbling down in the catastrophe of World War I.
In the wake of Napoleon’s defeat, the kings and aristocrats swiftly regained control in nearly all of Europe, France included. Especially because Russia was the most backward part of Europe — it still had serfdom — , its role as the molder of the post-Napoleonic Order didn’t bode well with idealists restless for change. Then, it is understandable why there was a special fury against the Russian order from radicals both within and outside Russia. Russia was seen by radicals as the haystack that broke the camel’s back of the revolution. When the October Revolution happened in 1917, it was the sweetest revenge to finally witness the most backward part of Europe undergo the most radical transformation. The element of revenge against Russia wasn’t only with Jews. It was with radicals and revolutionaries all across Europe. (Jews, along with Mongols, are the only people who conquered Russia. Jews did it again in the 1990s and are planning another Slavocaust.)


As the movie NICHOLAS AND ALEXANDRA finely illustrated, Russia was both a great power and weak power. Immense and limitless in raw materials with a population bigger than any other European country yet burdened by that very size. Also, ruling over so many ethnic groups meant the Russian core would come under constant assault by radical elements of every one of them, from Latvians to Georgians. Also, the concentration of power in the Tsar meant that the fall of that one edifice would throw all of the empire into turmoil, leading to civil war and chaos until a new regime took control with an iron grip.
Even though Russians are racially closer to Anglos and Germans than to Mongols, Turks, or Mexicans, the national character of Russians(and some other Slavs as well) was closer to that of Mexicans: Deficient in spark, initiative, and drive. Mexico was once immense, almost as big as the United States. So, why did it lose the SW territories? Because while Anglos swiftly moved westward to settle new lands and build enterprise, most Mexicans remained in their villages and eat tacos. If Mexicans had had the drive of Anglos, they would have developed the SW territories and turned Mexico into a great power. (The great migration of Mexicans into the US since the 1960s hasn’t been about initiative and spark but the opposite. Because Mexicans can’t do much on their own, they want to come to the US to just work for ‘gringo’.) Russians, to be sure, were far bolder than Mexicans in territorial ambition. They took all of Siberia and even claimed Alaska before stupidly selling it to the US. Still, Russians were far less good in developing than in merely conquering new lands. Look what a handful of Anglos did with Canada compared with what Russians did with all the territory they conquered.

Because Russia was both a great power and a weak power, both a strong man and a sick man, it was seen as predator by some, prey by others. Or as both predator and prey. To the Chinese whose star had fallen in the 19th century, Russia was just another predatory power scrambling to grab parts of North Asia. The Ottomans, also in decline, regarded Russia with growing fear. The British lion both despised and worried about the Russian bear. The Brits, the rulers of the greatest empire in the world in the late 19th century, knew Russia was backward in industry and technology. But the Brits also knew that Russians had embarked on industrialization on a massive scale to catch up with the West. Also, able Germans ran many Russian institutions and industries. Also, the sheer size of Russia intimidated the Brits. British Empire was huge but vulnerable because small numbers of British overlords ruled over increasingly restless natives. The British dominated the seas, but water wasn't as firm as land. British hostility against Russia grew to such intensity that the UK once sided with the Turks against Russia. And the UK also sided with Japan against Russia in the early 20th century. But the real tragedy that would befall the Slavs in the 20th century had to do with Jews and Germans, for reasons different and similar.

Upon German unification under the Prussian helm, the mentality of the Germans began to change. Though a capable people over the centuries, the Germans were too fragmented to be a great power. But the fact that Prussians, though limited in number and territory, could gain a vital foothold in Continental politics was a harbinger of things to come. If tiny Prussia could assert itself as a major player in Europe, what would happen if the German folks were to unite as one? Soon after the unification of German peoples, the new nation overshadowed France, traditionally the great land power in Europe. German victory against France that opposed further unification of Germany was so overwhelming that the French never fully recovered their pride. (Even though France won WWI, it was due to the grand alliance with UK, Russia, and US.) With such power, the Germans began to think in terms of their ‘place in the sun’. It was no longer enough to be part of a good nation, rich nation, or strong nation. Germany had to be a great power, even a world power. But the world was already taken. Brits and French had grabbed much of Africa, Middle East, and Asia. The New World was also colonized and taken. Plenty of Germans settled in the US, but they were losing their links to Germany. So, in order for Germany to become a world power, it had to move eastward and grab territory from vast Russia. And Germans felt justified in this for the same reason Anglo-Americans did in taking the SW territories. Anglos figured, "Mexicans are such useless, clueless, and uninspired bunch of bums, so we proud and tireless Anglos with work ethic should make something of the land." Germans felt the same way. They felt that Russians were too lazy, stupid, and drunk to deserve all that land. Germans could do so much more with it. Why let Russians have all that land and make nothing of it? If Germans took it, they could it up and become a great power. Now, such feelings weren’t necessarily genocidal, just like the Anglo-American conquest of SW territories was really just a land-grab. It was not a racial war on the Mexicans, and indeed, Anglos and Mexicans learned to co-exist in many communities, like we see in PAT GARRETT & BILLY THE KID.


But overtime, certain radical-racist elements of the German Population came to develop a racial rationale for invading and dominating over the Slavs. In their eyes, Slavs(especially Russians) weren’t merely lazy and underachieving whites but ‘untermensch’ whose lot was to serve as helots as Germans or be gradually eliminated to make way for German settlers. Even though the ‘Aryan’ vision of German-ruled Russia was frightening, there was a certain cold logic to it. A people who rule but come to rely on the labor of another people will eventually fall. White Americans in the North and Zionists both understood this. White Americans in the South made a huge mistake by bringing black slave labor from Africa. It made for profits in the short-term but losses in the long-term. Same happened to whites in South Africa who came to rely on black labor. In contrast, whites in the American North and Zionists in Palestine/Israel understood that a people must both rule and do the labor. This is why Jews are safe in Israel whereas whites are all but finished in South Africa. Spartans also failed in the long run because they relied on non-Spartan helots to do most of the work.

Anyway, even though the National Socialists were correct about their ethno-theory-of-management-and-labor, its implementation in Russia would have been ghastly. In order for Russia to be converted into a world of German ownership and labor, the native populations would have to be eliminated by the tens of millions. So, the ethno-theory-of-management-and-labor is morally applicable only in one’s own nation, not in other lands as it'd necessitate either genocide or mass expulsion. For Israel to become a Jewish state, the existing Palestinian population(700,000 of them) had to be removed by massive pogroms and ‘ethnic cleansing’. But at least, the Zionists didn’t kill too many people.
The Nazis, in contrast, had diabolical plans in the East. Even though the Nazis eventually lost the war and suffered horrible war crimes themselves, their Lebensraum plan was partially implemented in conquered areas, and the results were horrific. Even Slavs who had initially greeted the Germans as liberators from Godless communism came to fear the ruthless Germans more than the Soviets. Even though the Nazi Slavocaust ultimately failed, the Russian and other Slavic died in the millions by execution, starvation, and retaliation. To the extent that the Nazi Aryans weren’t merely out to grab some territory — something Europeans have been doing to one another since time immemorial — but carrying out a racial ideology of enslavement and extermination, it was indeed an act of genocide. Thus, the term ‘Slavocaust’ is most appropriate. Even though the brunt of Slavocaust fell on Slavs of the Soviet Union, the Nazis also acted brutally in Poland, vacillating between treating Poles as fellow second-rate Aryans or Slavic scum. And even though Nazi violence against Czechs was far less than toward Poles and Russians, there’s no telling what the long-term plan would have been. Germans, especially of Austrian background, hated Czechs because of bad blood between the two communities in the eras prior to WWI and immediate thereafter when German minorities in Czech-controlled territories were mistreated.

If the Nazi Slavocaust against Russians was blatant enough — the Nazis wore their radical-racist ideology on their sleeve — , it was more complicated with the Jews. Indeed, it could be argued that because Jewish Bolsheviks acted out of ‘social justice’, their war on the Slavosphere wasn’t really genocidal in nature. And it is true enough that Jews didn’t mean to wipe out entire populations of Slavs and replace them with another population. Still, despite all the egalitarian rhetoric, the fact is many Jews were motivated by a powerful animus against Russia. Partly, it was revenge for Russian 'oppression' of Jews. Even though the Jewish victims of the periodic pogroms weren’t exceedingly high(compared to 20th century horrors), Jews knew things were much better for their kind in Western Europe. On the basis of such contrasts, Russia seemed like an especial hell. It seemed even more so when Jews began to move to America. Suddenly, Jews compared Jews-over-here with Jews-over-there, and they concluded Russia as the worst place for Jews.

But there was also the long-existing Jewish view of goyim, especially Christians. Jews hated Christians as the people who stole their religion, their God. Also, Jews, who became adept in business and learning, came to regard the vast majority of Russians as dumb, lazy, and childish morons. Jews hated Russian elites as pompous a**holes and loathed Russian masses as ignorant, stupid, and boorish. So, even though Jewish Semites didn’t have an ideology of enslavement and extermination against the Slavs like the Nazi Aryans did, their radical cause wasn’t merely fueled by idealism and vision of justice. It was driven by animus, hatred, contempt, arrogance, and revanchism.
Jewish Bolsheviks were clever in cloaking their bilious impulses with prophetic promise of a better tomorrow. But in the end, a person is more about what he feels than what he says. If a person hates you, it doesn’t matter how he rationalizes his actions toward you in the name of goodwill and camaraderie. His gut instinct is out to get you. It’s like Jewish supremacists in the US always talk about curing white people of their ‘sins’ of ‘racism’, ‘white supremacism’, and etc. Jews talk like they’re doing whites a favor. But in truth, they are driven by ethnic animus, paranoia, and supremacism. They want to take over as the superior group and simply cannot abide by any goy group that says NO to the Jewish agenda.
If Jews feel contempt for Russian Slavs for being too stupid and lazy, they fear Anglos and Germanics for being too capable. In both cases, Jews act like Bad Faith Doctors who say they’re offering medicine when it’s really poison. Even though some Bolsheviks, Jewish or non-Jewish, were sincere in their hopes for a better world, there were too many nasty, vicious, sadistic, and psychopathic Jews among them who took up the cause because it opened the door to power and control. And in the guise of moral progress, they could wipe out entire classes of enemies. When certain farmers wouldn’t hand over the grain, they were classified as ‘kulaks’ and were eliminated without mercy.
Granted, Jews didn’t do this alone. They worked with the Georgian Stalin who regarded people as pawns. Jews weren’t the only ones with blood-soaked hands, but they were the main drivers. And in the early period of Soviet history, they were the most determined ethnic players at the elite level. (Also, once the ball got rolling,  there was no turning back. The Bolshevik terror was so extreme that is the Bolsheviks were to fall, they'd surely be torn limb from limb. Just like it was a zero-sum-game of win everything or lose everything for the Germans when they invaded Russia in WWII, Jewish Bolsheviks knew it was win or lose with nothing in between when Russia fell into the throes of Civil War. So, Jewish Bolsheviks doubled down on the terror with no show of mercy. We see the same psychological pattern among Jews today. They've pushed anti-white and anti-Christian PC so far that they fear it's win or lose; there is no more middle ground. Jews went all in for the jackpot. Jews sure can be degenerate gamblers.)
If history has taught us anything, Jews are the people with the deepest, bitterest hatred. With a nomadic-merchant ‘parasitic’ mentality, Jews have developed this ethno-megalomania that everything exists to be claimed and owned by them. If most people get upset when others try to take their stuff, Jews get upset when others won’t let Jews take their stuff. Granted, there is a partial justification as to why Jews may feel this way. Unlike Vikings and Mongols, Jews generally didn’t just plunder stuff outright. Rather, they came to non-Jewish places and set up businesses or services that expanded economic activity. So, Jews felt the bulk of the wealth should belong to them. This makes some sense, even good sense. If Jews in Russia build up businesses and generate revenue, why shouldn’t they keep most of the profits after taxes? The problem is Jews went further. Since Jews are adept at making money off the land(by means fair or foul), they began to feel that the land itself should belong to them.
For example, since Jews are the best businessmen in Russia, they should have the primary claim to Russia itself. It sounds crazy to us, but it sounds totally logical and justified to Jews. And in some nations, Jews have convinced the native population of the justness of such attitude. Jews did this by promoting the Shoah and presenting Jews as the most tragic, wise, wonderful, funny, endearing, and lovable people. So, many goyim in US and UK want to go out on a limb to help the Jews to take over more and more. It's like fans want their celebrity idols to become richer and richer, even at their own expense. For many cucky goyim, it's not enough to make Jews the richest people in the US and UK. Jews must have de facto ownership of US and UK so that THEY get to decide the national policy. So, if Jews say "America is a nation of immigrants" and that tons of non-whites must come and replace white people, it must be so because Jews are such a wise people, a sacred people, a wonderful people, a genius people. Many white Christians believe that their main mission in life is to appease and serve the noble, tragic, and wise Jews. In their eyes, there is nothing alarming about Jews, as the 2% of the population, controlling over 90% of the media. it only seems right. For white progs, there is nothing wrong with Jews replacing Christianity with Homomania. There is nothing wrong with Jews turning the US from a white nation into a ‘brown’ nation. Jews know best, and they should be allowed to call the shots. If you disagree, you are a ‘white supremacist’ or ‘nazi’. Jew-worship is so ingrained in the hearts and minds of Americans that even after Jewish oligarchs moved in concert to de-platform him, Alex Jones is full of praise of Jews and blaming the censorship on the ‘Chicoms’ or Chinese-Communists. (For some reason, attacking China is not considered a ‘hate speech’ by the Establishment because Jews find it useful to distract people from Jewish Power by making them babble about Yellow Peril.)


Anyway, the communist revolution in Russia(spearheaded by many Jews) led to the deaths of millions of lives by starvation, execution, or hard labor. Many innocents were tortured. Much of arts and culture was ransacked, plundered, stolen, or sold to foreigners. Tens of thousands of Churches were smashed. Slavs came to live in fear. To be sure, plenty of Slavs took part in the Revolution, and they also carried out bloody purges and killed people left and right. But it’s possible that the ‘Russian’ Revolution might not have turned out so extreme if not for the ethnic animus of Jewish Bolsheviks for whom the conflict was a matter of total victory or total defeat. (Ironically, the main threat to Jews came from within the Revolution in the figure of Stalin.) After all, the Kerensky regime after the Tsar’s abdication in February was also socialist, but it was closer to social-democracy than radical communism. It was patriotic, not anti-Russian. And when an election was held in the new Soviet Union, the great majority of the people voted for agro-socialist parties, but the results were nullified by the Bolsheviks who created a vast secret-police apparatus to terrorize and/or kill anyone who might pose a threat to the regime. Even though Stalin the Georgian took it to new heights, we need to keep in mind that Stalin came to power with the help of Jews.
Indeed, Jews miscalculated Josef Stalin, just like the German conservative elites underestimated Adolf Hitler. Jews thought they could manipulate Stalin, and the German conservatives thought they could keep Hitler on a leash. As it turned out, both men were of immense will-to-power and deviousness. In time, both Stalin and Hitler made their allies know who was boss in the grand scheme of things. That said, many Jews played a crucial role in the Soviet system all throughout Stalin’s rule. And Stalin also appointed lots of Jews to rule Eastern European nations that came into Soviet orbit at the end of World War II.

All in all, many Slavs and Eastern Europeans felt the brunt of both Jewish radical-socialism and German radical-racism. In the aftermath of WWI, countless Slavs in Russia and Ukraine were destroyed through the meat-grinder of the Revolution that even went so far as to kill all of the Tsar’s family. It is estimated that at least 3.5 million died in the Great Famine in Ukraine. Stalin wasn’t the only heartless bastard. Jewish Bolsheviks shed no tears for all the dead. And Jews in the West never called on the world to save Slavic Christians from Communism and Jewish mass-killers. (It’s like few Jews cared about the 100,000s of Iraqi women and children killed by Jewish-controlled US sanctions. And Jews sure don’t care about the 500,000 Syrians who died in the recent war due to Jewish machinations with US foreign policy.) Eric Hobsbawm the Jewish historian never expressed any moral outrage over the millions crushed by communism. Like what Madeleine Albright said of all those dead Iraqi kids, Hobsbawn's attitude was "It was worth it."
Jews endlessly bitch about how the world didn’t care when Nazis were killing members of the Tribe, but most Jews around the world were utterly indifferent to millions of Slavs being killed by Stalin and the Jews. Even capitalist Jews in the US and Europe felt closer to Communist Jews in the USSR than with ‘capitalist-kulak’ victims. Even Leon Trotsky, the dearly beloved god-hero of Neocons, didn’t protest Stalin’s forced collectivization program. At the height of the tragedy, Trotsky’s only criticism was it wasn’t radical enough.

Now, all these Jews who took part in the bloodbath justified themselves as agents of History; and if they got carried away, it was due to excessive enthusiasm for Justice. Over-zealous maybe but for noble ends. But, the communist horror was too grim for such self-serving excuses. And the sheer lack of reflection and remorse shown by the Jewish Community suggests a deep animus, arrogance, and contempt for Slavs. (Jews insist all Germans til the end of time must share in the Shoah Guilt, but they treat the Jewish Slavocaust as a tissue to blow their noses with and toss away.) Even though Jewish Bolsheviks didn’t have an explicit program for the extermination of Slavs, their attitude was one of megalomania and contempt. As such, Christian Slavs were seen as expendable cannon-fodder for the Revolution, laying the groundwork for radical policies that would lead to mass terror and deaths. The Slavs were seen as so many guinea pigs to be experimented by all-knowing Jews.
If Russia and Ukraine had majority Jewish populations, would Jewish Bolsheviks have been so reckless in their social experiments? Of course not. Jews hold Jewish lives as precious. They acted the way they did because they saw Slavs as hammer-and-sickle than flesh-and-blood. A people to be molded anyway the Jewish Bolsheviks deemed fit regardless of the human cost. Whether it’s George Soros pushing for Open Borders(and all the chaos that ensues) or Neocons calling for Wars for Israel, Jews don’t care about their consequences to goy lives. Jewish ‘leftists’ may believe in ‘justice’ and ‘equality’ in the abstract, but their emotions are driven by animus, arrogance, hatred, and contempt when dealing with goyim.
One thing for sure, Jewish globo-capitalists didn’t care how many Russians were destroyed by the Jewish looting of the economy in the 1990s. Jews never cared about the Zionism’s impact on Palestinians. Jews don’t care about the effect of Neocon policies on Iraq, Libya, Syria, Ukraine, or any other country.

As it happened, it was in Russia that Jews first got the chance to run riot and do as they please. Even though Jewish elites had gained immense fortunes and privileges in certain European nations, it was only with the ‘Russian’ Revolution that a bunch of Jews were flush with near-total power over a nation and could do as they pleased(at least for a time). The result was tragic, indeed catastrophic, leading to cultural destruction and deaths of millions. Back then and even now, Jews feel ZERO accountability for what they did. Jewish moral outrage only concerns the plight of Jews. Of course, on occasion, Jews will prop up some other group as deserving of special victim status, but it is purely strategic. The ONLY reason why Jews make a fuss about Black Slavery and Apartheid is because they are useful in baiting and paralyzing whites with ‘white guilt’. (Never mind Jews played a key role in the slave trade, and never mind Jews were the biggest exploiters of diamond mines and black labor in South Africa. Never mind Israel was the #1 ally of South Africa during Apartheid years, and never mind Mandela had the deepest admiration for Arafat and the PLO. Jews, with their media monopoly and whore-politicians in their pockets, rewrite history as they see it.) That is why Jews keep bringing up Emmit Till over and over but ignore all those dead Palestinians as statistics or faceless victims to be forgotten like yesterday’s papers.

Tragically, the Jewish Slavocaust mentality is still going like the Energizer Bunny. Not only are Jews unrepentant of what they’d done in Russia in the 1990s, they are calling on the US and EU to apply more sanctions on Russia(on cooked up charges) no matter how many people might suffer. As far as Jews are concerned, because the majority of Russians support Vladimir Putin(the New Hitler), they must all be made to suffer and brought to heel. Jews love to play God. They think they should have the right to smite any people and play the game of "Jews giveth, Jews taketh away".

The Slavic peoples suffered greatly in the 20th century due to Slavocaust coming from two directions: Radical Semites and Radical Aryans. Radical Semites thought they knew everything and everything must conform to their agenda. Even though they adopted a 'universal' ideology, it was used to serve their tribal supremacist ambition against Slavs-as-cattle, just like the pigs in George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM talk a good game about ‘equality’ but lord over the other animals.
Even today, notice how Jews really operate on the basis of "Is it good for the Jews?" but mask their tribal agenda with talk of ‘social justice’. Funny how this 'social justice' only makes Jews richer and more powerful at the expense of everyone else. If Jews really care for equal justice, who does Israel get showered with billions in aid while Iran is hit with sanctions? Doesn’t Israel have 300 illegal nukes while Iran has none? Why favor Israel over Iran? It makes no sense to waste goodwill on Jews. Jews simply feel, "We are smarter, we are better, we are holier, and we should rule over you, and you exist to serve us and obey us and believe everything we tell you. If not, you’re an ‘anti-Semite’ and ‘Nazi’." In the US, Jews force all of us to support their mass tyranny over Palestinians. Jews, who are only 2% of the population, get to control over 90% of media and virtually all internet platforms. Yet, we never hear of Jewish supremacism or Jewish privilege. Instead, Jews cover up their immense power by making people fixate and foam at the mouth over ‘White Privilege’.

In other words, Jews have learned NOTHING from the Slavocaust. Of course, Jews remember the Holocaust and remind us to erect more monuments and watch more Holocaust movies and weep for Jews and die for Jews and worship Jews. But Jews, by and large, feel zero accountability for their role in the Slavocaust. Also, they would rather not ponder the perverse irony that both Jews and Nazi Aryans took part in the Slavocaust. Jews did it from the ‘far left’ and Nazis did it from the ‘far right’. But then, to the extent that Jewish Bolsheviks felt profoundly Jewish despite their universalist and egalitarian ideology, they were subconsciously motivated by ‘far right’ ultra-tribal passions: "Is it good for the Jews?"

Well, if Jews learned nothing from the Slavocaust, did the Germans learn something? No. Even though Germans endlessly kvetch about their boo-hoo-hoo guilt for the Holocaust, they now feel NOTHING about what they did to Slavs in Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Russia. Germans feel nothing about the millions of Slavs they'd slaughtered in WWII and, furthermore, now work in concert with George Soros to push massive invading armies of Muslims and Africans into Eastern Europe. And Germany is fully on-board with the Jewish-controlled US to ‘punish’ Russia no matter how many people may be direly affected. Even though Germans no longer feel a murderous zeal for Slavocaust(as Jews still do), they feel no conscience or guilt for all the horrors they’d visited on Poles, Czechs, Ukrainians, and Russians during WWII. If Aryans and Semites had one thing in common in the 21st Century, it was their supremacist contempt for Slavs as Inferiors. Aryans chose extermination but failed in WWII. Semites slaughtered millions of Slavs in the name of 'progress'.

We must remember the Slavocaust and make sure it doesn’t happen again. To prevent another such tragedy, we must call out on the depraved evil that has become of Jewish Power.

Slavocaust Files: 

https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/slezkinerev.pdf

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1991-08-02/news/9103250140_1_lazar-kaganovich-ukraine-moscow

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jan/25/russia.books

https://nypost.com/2001/02/15/how-marc-helped-plunder-russia/

http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=57http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=57

https://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/did-privatization-increase-the-russian-death-rate/

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-jews-and-nazis/

"Over the last few years, many outside observers have noted a seemingly very odd political situation in Ukraine. That unfortunate country possesses powerful militant groups, whose public symbols, stated ideology, and political ancestry all unmistakably mark them as Neo-Nazis. Yet those violent Neo-Nazi elements are all being bankrolled and controlled by a Jewish Oligarch who holds dual Israeli citizenship. Furthermore, that peculiar alliance had been mid-wifed and blessed by some of America’s leading Jewish Neocon figures, such as Victoria Nuland, who have successfully used their media influence to keep such explosive facts away from the American public.
At first glance, a close relationship between Jewish Israelis and European Neo-Nazis seems as grotesque and bizarre a misalliance as one could imagine, but after recently reading Brenner’s fascinating book, my perspective quickly shifted. Indeed, the main difference between then and now is that during the 1930s, Zionist factions represented a very insignificant junior partner to a powerful Third Reich, while these days it is the Nazis who occupy the role of eager suppliants to the formidable power of International Zionism, which now so heavily dominates the American political system and through it, much of the world."

The gulf between US and Russia owes to just one thing: The Jewish factor.
Since the end of the Cold War, the US has become more servile to Jewish power with each passing year.
Meanwhile, since 2000, Russia has become less servile to Jewish power with each passing year.

So, it’s not really about US vs Russia. It’s about Servility to Jewish Globo-Homo Supremacism vs Independence(relatively speaking) from Jewish Globo-Homo Supremacism.

IF not for the Jewish ethno-supremacist hatred for Russia, I don’t think US-Russian relations would be so bad. It wouldn’t be close but it would be cordial and respectful. It is Jewish Hysteria that is so afraid that white gentiles make takes cues from Russia and throw off the Jewish Globo-Homo yoke. That’s about it.

It is also a ‘religious’ war. In the past, the US was a mostly Christian nation. So, the Cold War was about Christian America vs Godless Russia(whose real religion was Marx and Lenin). But ever since Jews took power in the US, they’ve done everything to weaken and destroy Christianity. Jewish Bolsheviks in Soviet Union destroyed 50,000 churches. In the US, Jews attacked Christianity in subtler ways. While covering up Jewish corruption and Rabbi sexual scandals, Jewish media exposed Christian corruptions, especially in the Catholic Church. Also, Jews promoted hedonism that made Americans addicted to sensual pleasure above all else. Gambling, Porn, and other vice industries are all controlled by Jews. Also, Jews not only pushed for ‘gay rights’ but Gay Rites, a near-worship of homos(and even trannies) as holy angels.

So, a whole new generation of Americans grew up worshiping Homos. In the US, you don’t lose your job by badmouthing God, Jesus, or Christianity(or white people, as the Sarah Jeong brouhaha illustrated; if anything, she was hired mainly for her anti-white vitriol that is useful to Jewish elites). But if there’s the slightest whiff of ‘homophobic’ sentiments, you are a heretic and you are out. So, Homo-Worship or Homomania is virtually the new religion of the US. As Joe Biden said, Jews spread it and made converts of Americans addicted to TV. Alex Jones was shut down on account that he said unkind things about Trannies corrupting children. The media and platforms are mostly owned by Jewish oligarchs.

So, it was easy for Jews to manipulate Americans into hating Russia. Russia is no longer communist but nationalist and Christian. In contrast, Jewish-controlled US is globo-imperialist and filled with missionary zeal of spreading Homomania as the rainbow-faith all over the world. So, when Russia said NO to ‘gay pride’ parades on Red Square(used annually to commemorate the 20 million dead in WWII), so many Americans seethed with moral and quasi-spiritual outrage. How dare those ‘heathens’ not accept the sacraments of Holy Homomania!

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

It’s Time to Name the Real Culprit in the Banning of Alex Jones and Infowars from the Major Platforms — It is Time to Name You-Know-Who, or Yonuhu’s — Yes, JEWS are behind the Great Purge of Patriotism

On the Ethno-Gentrification of the Media. Those who ethnically cleansed the Palestinians, looted the Russian economy, destroyed Western borders, and laid waste to Iraq-Libya-Syria are now INFO-CLEANSING the Internet. Should the 2% be gatekeepers of news and info for 98% of Americans who are goy? Tribal Oligarchs as corrupt referees calling foul on anyone who warns of the rigged system owned by the Deep State. We need to expose how the 2% control 95% of media in the US. Expose Jewish supremacist power and privilege.

If the Tribe treats White People this way, is there any reason why white folks should support Israel? When Jews treat you like Palestinians, have the decency to side with Palestinians and join with BDS. After all, what do Palestinians and Hungarians(or Poles or any white majority population) have in common? Both are targeted for destruction by the Globalists.


As all of you surely heard, Alex Jones and Inforwars have been simultaneously banned by Youtube, Facebook, Apple, Spotify, Pinterest, and few other monopolistic platforms. According to these firms, Alex Jones’s channel had to go because of ‘hate speech’, something vaguely decided by the Powers-That-Be. ‘Hate Speech’, like ‘Obscenity’, can be stretched to mean just about anything. Also, the Powers-that-be protect and even promote certain kinds of hatred while suppressing other kinds. Worse, they defame speech they don’t like as ‘hate’ just to shut it down. Censorship of Alex Jones is pushed by the Corporate Media, but it’s in concert with the State and institutions such as academia and law firms. And if there is any connective thread linking all these private and public entities, it is the not-so-hidden-hand of Jewish supremacist Power. People don’t like to Name the Jew either out of fear or slavish devotion to anything Jewish(as the result of indoctrination since childhood of how Jews are so wonderful, wise, holy, and lovable, with the corollary that anyone who is critical of Jews or Israel must be a ‘rabid and virulent antisemitic Nazi’). So perhaps, it’s useful to refer to Jews as You-Know-Who’s or Yunohu’s.

After all, due to the sheer immensity of Jewish Power, even slavish philo-semites must know, on some level, that Jews as the unnameable you-know-who’s are pulling the strings from behind the scenes. At this point, it’s no secret that George Soros and his ilk have been behind many agendas so harmful to whites and other non-Jews around the world. But it’s taboo to Name the Jew that the critics of Soros feel obligated to emphasize that he must be an ‘anti-Semite’ because, as a boy, he collaborated with the Nazis who rounded up Jews. But as a boy, Soros was only trying to survive, and he wasn’t the ONLY Jew who acted thus to save his own skin. People collaborate in a climate of fear. Indeed, look at white Americans who collaborate with Jewish supremacists even though the latter is waging war on White America and White Europe because they don’t want to be destroyed in career and livelihood. If white Americans who are not threatened at gunpoint so cravenly collaborate with Jewish globo-homo supremacists, we can understand why the young Soros collaborated with Nazis to save his own skin. People are not angels or saints. They are all-too-human, for better or worse. The problem of Soros is not that he once served the Nazis. Rather, he is all too typical of others of his tribe on both the ‘left’ and ‘right’. Notice that Neocon Jews hardly ever attack Soros. If anything, their agenda is closer to Soros-ism than American Nationalism. Jews of all stripes are generally supportive of Jewish globalist hegemony, and nearly all of them are virulently hostile to any sign of non-Jewish identity and national interests. They see goy national identity-interests as obstacles to Globo-Homo Pax Judeana.

Imperialists generally hate all nationalisms except their own. The British Imperialists guarded their own racial identity and national interests BUT suppressed the nationalist aspirations of their subject peoples for independence and autonomy. Today, the Jewish-Power-Network rules the world via connections from LA to Chicago to NY to Boston to London to Paris to Berlin to Warsaw to Moscow. Yes, Jews are so powerful that even Russia, the main target of Jewish hostility, must praise and protect Jews. Jews suffer no consequences for spewing hatred against others. Even their victims feel compelled to praise and honor Jews because the World Economy is so dominated by Jewish Power. Jews not only want to maintain the current hegemony but expand it further. Jews do this by using ‘free trade’ to suck all the world into the US-dominated trade zone. Jews do it by promoting Homomania and Afromania. Via Homomania, Jews recruit homos in every nation to do the bidding of Jews. Also, by making all the world revere and serve the homo minority, Jews encourage an attitude among all goyim that minority must be favored over the majority. As Jews are minorities in all nations except in Israel, you can see how this is good for Jews. Also, Homomania isn’t just a cause for ‘gay rights’ but a proselytization of Gay Rites as the new globo-faith. It is supposed to supplant Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and etc. If Jews can’t exactly get rid of those religions, they seek to associate them with homo symbols. In the Old Soviet Union, Jewish Bolsheviks physically destroyed churches. In the 21st century, Jewish Corporate Trotskyites seek the desecrate and destroy the souls of every religion by associating them with Homo-Worship. When Christians are led to believe that Jesus died for the glory of men doing fecal penetration on each other or going to a doctor to have his penis and balls removed for a fake ‘vagina’, you know it’s a soul-sick or dead religion. Or imagine Buddhists being convinced that, after a long meditation, Siddhartha’s great revelation is that a penis in the anus is holy. Or imagine Muslims being led to believe that Muhammad, the last and greatest prophet(according to the faithful), had a message for all mankind, and it is ‘Bruce Jenner is really a woman’. When religions are homomaniacked, they wilt and die. They turn into a farce, and Faith cannot survive as a joke.
Jews also spread Afromania to undermine national cultures. Why are blacks so effective in this? It’s because they easily beat other races in sports, make funky music, and have bouncier butts and bigger dongs. So, when a nation takes in just a few blacks, they take over the sports and become revered as the new idols of national heroism. Blacks are 5% of the French population but dominate sports, and so, the white French now look to blacks as the face of French manhood and glory. French manhood is finished and cucked. Also, black music, being so sexual and wild, turn kids around the world into jungle junkies who main cultural obsession is imitating rappers. And because black booty is at the center of this, all cultures are ‘twerkized’. Civilizations rose by suppressing the energies of the groins and buttocks and by emphasizing the hands(makers of things), heart(empathy and depth), and brains(reason and logic). But with the spread of Afromania, all the world is turned onto jungle jivery that is controlled by Jewish music industry moguls, sports franchise oligarchs, and porn-meisters. Also, with the spread of Afromania, women around the world are turned onto jungle fever, and they come to lose respect for their own men as inferior. We see this with the rise of cuckery especially in the West. Cuck-culture is about white males accepting their submissive role as weak and wussy ‘white boys’ vis-a-vis the Real Manhood of black men who are now deemed to be most deserving of ‘white pussy’. That is our culture, like it or not, and Jews spread this template all around the world. (Granted, Afromania may destroy Jewish power also because too many Jewish girls, especially half-Jewish ones born of ‘shikse’ mothers, also have jungle fever now and reject Jewish men as dorks and wimps.)

Anyway, Jews have the Real Power in America and that means around the world as well because the US is the lone superpower. Or, to be more accurate, there is a power even greater than that of America, and it is the Empire of Judea, or EOJ. The Jewish globo-power-network is the most powerful force in the world, and the US is a part of that empire. However, the US is prized by Jews because it is their Jewel in the Crown. The US is the only sound foundation of Jewish Power. Even though Jewish power is extensive in some European nations, it is nothing like the Jewish stranglehold on America. Also, even if Jewish power dominated ONLY America, it would still be the greatest power in the world because the US, even on its own, is the lone superpower.
In the end, imperial power is always precarious because it’s about minority rule over much of the world. The Romans were powerful as long as they could instill fear in their non-Roman subjects. But once the fear dissipated, the empire was bound to fall almost overnight. The British Empire was gigantic and mighty, but it was about small numbers of Brits lording over vast numbers of non-whites around the world. If the latter were to rouse up with a sense of nationalist identity and interests, British Empire found itself skating on thin ice. As powerful as the US is around the world with its military and financial power, its hegemony is not a sure or permanent thing. The US must constantly use a combination of carrots and sticks to make the world comply with US demands, which have become synonymous with Jewish supremacist and Zionist agendas. This is why Jews prize their hold over the US above all things. If Jewish hegemony fails around the world, the Jews can always say, "Well, we got the US" and retreat to their primary power center. And having the US as lone superpower, it can always exert pressure on other nations, even ones that resent and hate the US.

Jews must suppress American Nationalism because it prioritizes what is good for All Americans than what is good for Jews around the world. American Jews don’t primarily identify with fellow Americans. They feel far closer to other Jews around the world than with goyim in the US. Just like the British in India felt closer to the British in Africa and vice versa than with Indians or Africans, Jews in the US feel closer to Jews in UK, France, Germany, Poland, Russia, Israel, and etc. than with non-Jewish Americans. As far as Jews are concerned, goyim exist mainly to listen to Jews, obey Jews, revere Jews, and serve Jews. When a bunch of people on horseback gather together, do they feel closer to one another as fellow humans or do they feel closer to the horses they are sitting on? Of course, the real connection is human-to-human, with the humans regarding horses merely as creatures that exist to serve humans. Likewise, Jews all over the world see non-Jews as horses to ride. Jews in the US ride the biggest and strongest horse, and American Jewish riders help Jews in other nations to ride the goyim there like horses too.
Riders and Horses. It's like Jewish globo-masters and their Goy cuck-collaborators.
American Jewish advisers in Russia of the 1990s aided Russian Jews on how to saddle the Russian goy horse and ride it ragged. Jews abused the Russian horse so badly that Putin reversed the Jewish rough-riding somewhat and unhorsed the worst of the Jewish oligarchs, and he’s been appreciated by the Russian people for restoring some measure of nationalism. But even Russia is not fully independent because of so much of Russian economy is dependent on foreign commerce controlled by the US that is controlled by Jews.

Anyway, it is time that we admitted the facts as to why Alex Jones got banned from the major platforms. We must name the you-know-who or yonuhu. It’s the Jews. Come on, it’s the Jews. Who owns Youtube? Who owns Facebook? Who owns the biggest firms on Silicon Valley? It’s been reported that CNN and other news networks requested Facebook and Youtube to purge Infowars. Who owns CNN and Big Media? Hawaiians? Eskimos? Dumb ‘Polacks’? Japanese-Americans? Mormons? West Virginia Hillbillies? Blacks?
You Know Who, and it’s the Jew. THE REAL PRESSING CONCERN FOR ALL FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLES IS THAT THE MEDIA AND INTERNET PLATFORMS ARE CONTROLLED BY ETHNO-MONOPOLY OF JEWS WHO MAKE UP ONLY 2% OF THE POPULATION. IMAGINE ANY NATION WHERE A MINORITY THAT MAKES UP 2% GETS TO CONTROL AND MONOPOLIZE NEARLY ALL MEDIA AND PLATFORMS. IT WOULD BE CALLED IMPERIALISM! IN ORDER TO HAVE REAL CHANGE, WE NEED TO BRING ATTENTION TO THE ETHNO-MONOPOLY OF THE MEDIA. THAT SHOULD BE THE CORE ISSUE. HOW DARE THE 2% GET TO DECIDE THE RIGHTS OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION OF THE 98%? OF COURSE, THERE ARE PLENTY OF NON-JEWS WHO SUPPORT JEWISH CENSORSHIP, BUT THAT'S BECAUSE THEY'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED BY JEWISH ETHNO-MONOPOLY OF MEDIA AND ELITE INSTITUTIONS. JUST ASK YOURSELF. IS IT HEALTHY FOR ANY SOCIETY TO ALLOW THE 2% TO HAVE MONOPOLY POWER OVER NEWS AND INFORMATION THAT AFFECTS THE 98%? CAN YOU IMAGINE ISRAEL ALLOWING A NON-JEWISH MINORITY THAT IS 2% CONTROLLING ALL THE MEDIA IN ISRAEL? JEWS ARE NOT SO STUPID. SO, WHY DO WE TOLERATE THE ETHNO-MONOPOLISTIC SITUATION IN THE US?
While it’s true that big corporations moved against the competitor-corporation of Infowars, there was an ethnic, or more precisely an ethno-monopolistic, aspect to the move against Alex Jones. This wasn’t just corporatism. It was Corporate Trotskyism. Long ago, many Jewish elites and radicals took up Marxism, and their great hero was the full-bloodied Jew Leon Trotsky, indeed even more so than Lenin(who was only 1/4 Jewish). Even when Jews soured of communism and came to see it as one big folly, they still honored Trotsky as the kind of tireless, ruthless, and relentless Jewish ball-of-fire inflamed with the Will to Power to change the entire world. To this day, Neocons revere Trotsky as a great Jewish Prophet. Jews no longer believe in communism, but they still believe in a kind of permanent revolution. It is no longer in the service of ideology but identity. To Jews, the End of History means the Beginning of the Permanent Revolution for Jewish Identity as the supreme hegemonic power around the world.

So, it’s not enough to say Big Corporations did this to Alex Jones. We must ask WHO owns and controls those corporations. Some argue that Facebook and Youtube were pressured to ban people like Alex Jones by Advertisers and it’s all about money. That is nonsense. After all, so many consumers in the US are white and Trump-supporters, so why isn’t there pressure on Youtube and Facebook from Advertisers to shut down anti-white, anti-Trump, anti-Christian, and anti-patriotic speech? No, the fact is Jews at Youtube and Facebook want to shut down the free speech of goy patriots, and they use the Advertising Issue as an excuse. Advertising, like Youtube and Facebook, is mostly controlled by Jews in the US, and what all these Jews have in common is ruthless ambition for Jewish supremacist hegemony and fear of nationalist resistance against Globalism. So, this isn’t just about corporations. It’s about the hostile ethnic supremacism of Jews in the top industries working in concert to shut down voices that challenge the Narrative pushed by guys like George Soros, Paul Singer, Michael Bloomberg, and the rest of the Tribe. We cannot understand what is really going on UNLESS we take the element of Jewish hostility into account. Youtube banned Alex Jones for the same reason Google bans any doodle for Easter. Jews feel hostility toward Christianity, and they fear the stirrings of White Independence that may eventually break free of Jewish domination like the American Revolutionaries broke free from the British Empire.
The same ethnic logic was behind the Iraq War. So many tried to explain it in terms of ‘No Blood for Oil’. But if the US really wanted to steal oil, why not invade Saudi Arabia and take its oil? Besides, Hussein was all-too-willing to do business with the West. It wasn't him who said NO to Western investment in Iraq. Rather, it was the Jewish-controlled US that forced sanctions on Iraq and made it difficult for Iraq to export oil, even to buy basic items like foodstuff and medicine. Also, even with sanctions on Iraq, the world was awash in oil, and it’s not like any nation was desperate for oil like Japan during WWII. No, the main reason for the invasion was Jews feared a united Iraq as a rival of Israel. Via invasion, Jews hoped that Iraq would become another pliable client state like Saudi Arabia, a loyal dog of the US and Israel. The protest signs should have read NO BLOOD FOR JUDEO-NAZIS.

Indeed, this is where classic Marxist theory fails. By emphasizing economic interests over ethnic identity, it believes that history is animated by mere materialist greed. Now, Marxists weren’t entirely wrong. A people can become deracinated and emotionally severed from their ethnic kin and be concerned mostly about class or moneyed interests. This can be said about many white elites who feel no sense of racial identity, pride, and solidarity with the white masses. All they care about is status, wealth, and privilege on the individual level. But even that isn’t entirely true. Because tribalism is a part of human nature, a people who reject their own identity invariably latch onto the identity of others who still maintain the pride of identity. It's like those who have no cause fill the vacuum by latching onto those who do have a cause. So, even though whites are deracinated in their whiteness, they are fervently racial in their devotion to Afromania, Jewish pride, and pro-Zionism. Hillary Clinton and Paul Ryan may have no use for whiteness, but they sure are totally gaga in their enthusiasm for all things Jewish or Zionist.

At any rate, mere economic theories don’t explain what is happening in the world. In a way, Marx and other Jews pushed an economic theory of history to mask the power of Jewish identity. After all, Jewish capitalists weren’t merely out for profits per se but for profits to bolster Jewish Power. Jewish profits were meant to serve Jewish prophecy. Jewish capitalists favored Zionism. Jewish capitalists also funded the Bolsheviks out of ethnic interests. They wanted fellow Jews, even if communist, to topple the Old Order in Russia and take over. Tribal solidarity trumped ideology or mere material interest. And when we re-examine Russia of the 90s, it wasn’t just economic forces at play. It was capitalism + Jewish identity working in tandem. So, we need a theory of Ethno-Capitalism. It is simply not true that capitalism is always about color-blind or apolitical supply-and-demand of goods and services for profits.
Now, there is much in capitalism that prioritizes profits and individual self-interest above all else. Even enemies will trade with one another for profits and mutual interest. If two nations are enemies but if one produces oil but no iron while the other produces iron but no oil, they may have to trade with one another out of sheer need. But, capitalism isn’t just about profits. Sometimes, prophecy(of ethnic ambition or national vision) trumps profits. Or, short-term profits may be sacrificed in favor of long-term profits, a kind of economic prophecy. For example, the US could have made lots of money by continuing to sell iron and oil to Japan that was then invading and occupying China. It would have been great for short-term profits. But if Japan were to dominate all Asia, it might grow into a great power and pose a threat to US ambitions for world hegemony. So, Japan was hit with the embargo. Jews feel the same way. Sure, Jews will often trade with just about anyone to make more money. But when Jews must choose between profits and prophecy, they often go with the latter because Jews believe profits must serve prophecy than vice versa. This prophecy is Jewish supremacist hegemony over the world. Sanctions against Iraq and Iran prevented many Jews from doing business there. They cut into Jewish economic opportunities. But they were deemed worthwhile because the Main Interest of Jews is to ensure Israel’s position as the only superpower in the Middle East. So, Jews were willing to choose Zionist prophecy over profits. Same goes with Russia. If sanctions against Russia were lifted, Jews in US and EU could make lots more money by doing business. But Jews regard that as short-term profit that may undermine long-term Jewish prophecy and even greater profits. A Russia that is open to business may boom economically, and that will be good for Putin. With more money, Russians will be able to fund more nationalist projects. So, Jews figure short-term profits must be sacrificed to undermine and destroy Russia with heavy sanctions. Once Russia is brought to heel, it can be taken over by Jews and their Globo-Homo cuck-collaborators. Then, not only will Jews come to own Russia like they own the US but they will be able to make even more profits.
At any rate, so much of capitalism was entwined with identity. This was no less true of Jews than with any other people. Because there was so much talk of Jews and Money, men like Marx and other Jewish communists may have favored a theory that convinced people believe that economic forces are impersonal and trans-national. And they wanted people to believe that the triumph of communism would also be impersonal and trans-national but for the sake of proletarian justice than exploitation. Indeed, it’s interesting that in their theories of both capital and labor, these Jewish radicals de-emphasized the element of identity, race, and nation. It’s possible they didn’t want us to think about Jewish role in capitalism and Jewish role in communism. Behind the ruse of universalism of greed or justice, Jews were seeking supremacist and hegemonic power.

Capitalism is not merely about profits. After all, Jews could have invested heavily in Infowars and made Jones a business partner. The fact is one can make money off just about anything. If Jews really feel that there are too many ‘deplorable white racists’ out there, Hollywood can make a killing with movies that cater to the ‘prejudices’ of ‘white rednecks’. But Hollywood doesn’t. It forgoes profiteering from such a market because their long-term prophecy of Tribal Supremacism over goyim trumps any short-term profits. In order for Jews to maintain their own supremacism, they must convince and compel whites to serve Jewish interests than their own. And the ONLY way to do this is to by paralyzing white identity and pride with the cult of ‘white guilt’. Whites must be convinced that any sign of white identity or white desire for independence from Jewish Power is ‘white supremacist’, ‘nazi’, and ‘hate’. This is why the most effective way to combat Jewish Supremacism is to state that (1) Jewish supremacism is the reigning power in the US and the world and (2) that you and your people no longer want to support this satanic Jewish-Zionist neo-Trotskyist supremacism that promotes Hate for Iran and Russia, crushes Palestinians, demeans people of European ancestry and Christians, promotes near-genocidal wars for Israel, aids & abets Wall Street and Las Vegas’ fleecing of humanity, and pushes mass migration-invasion into ALL nations except Israel in order to use Diversity as a tool for Divide-and-Rule by Jews.
Even though the prophetic end-game of Jews is to convert and enslave white goyim into permanent collaborator-and-helot race of the Jews(what the Nazis envisioned for Slavic populations upon Nazi victory), there are so many foolish whites who think a partnership of equals is possible between Jews and whites. They think, "If we scratch Jews’ back and stoke their egos, they will scratch ours and be kind to us." But while whites scratch the Jews’ back and kiss the Jews’ ass, Jews stab whites in the back and kick whites in the ass. Whites say, "We will suck your Jewish cock and swallow", and the Jews says, "Oh yeah? You do just that while we castrate your balls, cut off your dick, and replace your manhood with a fake ‘vagina’." But then, why should Jews respect whites? Whites outnumber Jews by a huge margin, BUT whites are willing to accord Jews the status of equal partnership in the Alliance? Can you imagine a society where Jews outnumber non-Jews by a huge margin but offer equal partnership between the two communities? Jews would laugh at such an idea. Imagine Jews in Israel according equal partnership to Palestinians. ROTFL.
So, Jews see the white offer of equal partnership as weakness and stupidity. Jews feel nothing but contempt for sappy white cucks. Also, precisely because Jews are outnumbered by whites, they know that an equal partnership could easily be tip in favor of the far more numerous whites as time passes. So, if Jewish power is to be assured vis-a-vis whites, they must hold the whip hand. They must have power over whites, not parity with whites. And this whip hand isn’t merely about control of money and privilege. After all, having lots of money doesn’t guarantee moral justification. The Shah of Iran was obscenely rich, but most Iranians just saw him as a greedy pig. Even now, white people have more wealth than blacks and browns, but they are only accused of ‘white privilege’, which morally invalidates white success.
In the past, Jews were generally richer than white Christians in Europe, but this only led to white accusations of Jewish greed and parasitism. So, socio-economic might alone can come under moral attack. The might has to seem righteous in order to be shielded from criticism. Without the element of the righteous, the might can only rule by bribery or fear. This is why Jews have used the double whammy of Holocaustianity and Slave Narrative to paralyze whites with ‘white guilt’ while elevating themselves to the status of The People of Six Million Messiahs Who Were Crucified in the Holocaust. This Narrative is getting more perverse by the day because there is such a naked and stark discrepancy between the venal character of most powerful Jews and the 'sacralized' image of Holy Jewish Victims of Shoah. Granted, there are some morally impressive Jews like Norman Finkelstein. Whatever one thinks of Finkelstein's overall ideology, one can't help but admire his conviction that the true lesson of the Holocaust is that Jews must act as moral exemplars, not cynical exploiters of past tragedy to further Jewish supremacist interests. Finkelstein finds it appalling that Jews invoke WWII and Shoah to justify what they’ve done to Palestinians and to wage Wars in the Middle East instigated mostly by Neocons and other power-mad Zionists.
But as it happens, Power Prophets outnumber Principle Prophets in the Jewish community. Flush with unlimited cash, power, privilege, and success, Jews are now addicted to supremacist power. According to Jewish logic, Jewish domination is as natural and necessary as the Sun rising in the East. That means anyone who opposes or rejects Jewish supremacism is ‘unpatriotic’, ‘treasonous’, and ‘hateful’. Yes, in the Current US, a white person who says that he doesn’t want to serve Jewish globo-homo supremacism and would rather serve what is good for America is a ‘hater’, ‘traitor’, and ‘white supremacist’, whereas any white American who hates his own race, calls for dissolution of borders, and champions Jewish globo-homo supremacism is the True American(or True Conservative). In short, Jews think they own the US and the world. They think humanity should obey and serve Jews. Such is the ONLY LOYALTY and ‘patriotism’ that Jews can tolerate. All goyim must be primarily ‘patriotic’ and ‘loyal’ to Jewish power. The reason why Jews hate Russia is that Russians chose Russian identity and interests over Jewish globo-homo power. According to Jewish logic, Russians who chose Russian-ness are ‘traitors’. How dare Russians favor their own kind over Jews(and Homos)! Similarly, Jews have redefined Americanism so that nothing is more ‘patriotic’ and ‘loyal’ than serving Jews, homos, Israel, and Diversity. By Diversity and Inclusion(euphemism for Invasion), Jews mean that white Americans must reject their own kind in favor of Jewish supremacism and non-white mass-colonizers. This is great for Jewish supremacism because the increasing number of non-whites allows Jewish elites to play divide-and-rule among the goy races. It’s like Jewish NYT hired Sarah Jeong the Yellow Dog to bark at whitey. And by using that yellow dog as the Face of Anti-Whiteness, Jews mask the fact that THEY are the main ones pushing anti-white vitriol. Jews do the same with Muslims. Jews promote fears of Muslim Terrorism in movies and TV shows. They encourage white Christians to join the military and fight in Wars for Israel that leads to death and destruction of 100,000s of Muslims and Arabs. But then, Jews encourage Muslim Mass-Migration to the West, coddle Muslims as part of Diversity, and indoctrinate them to hate Whitey as the enemy. These Jews are truly a bunch of a**holes.

Now, Alex Jones hasn’t been anti-Jewish or anti-Zionist. At times, he has said Israel is going too far in Gaza or West Bank. But overall, he’s been pro-Zionist and pro-Jewish. If anything, like Rush Limbaugh, he’s been scapegoating ‘Chicoms’ and Yellow Peril. He’s been raising alarms about Muslims and Terrorism. He has rarely said anything that is blatantly critical of Jewish power. Indeed, he once said SAUDI ARABIA controls Hollywood. LOL. Joel Stein would beg to differ. And even after the Jews of Google and Facebook banned Jones, he blames the Chinese, indeed as if Jew-run US corporations take orders from Beijing.
Now, US companies must comply with Chinese demands when they do business IN China. But China has NO SAY whatsoever with what Jew-run companies do IN the US. So, if Alex Jones has been so careful not to tread on the Jewish Tiger’s tail, why has he been BANNED BY JEWS or BBJ? Because he’s popular as not just a journalist but showman and entertainer. He has a large following for his antics as cantankerous maverick(and even some leftists tuned to his show because most of MSM is Deep State propaganda run by a handful of Jewish oligarchs). Also, even though he doesn’t directly go after Jews, his positions on many matters and issues go against their Agenda. This is true of Donald Trump as well. Despite Trump’s constant praise of Jews and Israel, his preference for nationalist sovereignty over globalist hegemony ticks off a lot of Jews who love to use the US to spread permanent Globo-Homo hegemony over the world. Also, Jews want to use the US as a battering-ram against any nation Jews don’t like. So, when Trump wants to de-escalate the war in Syria and bring US troops back home, Jews freak out. When Trump wants better relations with Russia now that the Cold War has passed into the dustbin of history, Jews get all triggered because Jews want to use US power to destroy Russia and make it bow down to Jewish globalist supremacism. Since it’s difficult for Jews to get most Americans riled up about Russia, they made Homomania the central moral-spiritual issue for most proggies. There was a time when most American didn’t worship Homos. If anything, most Americans thought fecal penetration among men was pretty gross. But ever since Jewish media and academia(with funding of Wall Street, Silicon Valley, Las Vegas, and Hollywood) made Homomania the secular religion of the West, so many proggies get triggered over the fact that Russia won’t allow massive globo-homo parades on the Red Square or allow globo-homo propaganda in elementary schools. Proggies are outraged that Russia won’t accept Homomania, rather like how Christian Americans in the past were offended that some heathen population didn't take kindly to Christian missionaries. Remember how US imperialism used to rationalize its incursions and invasions of other nations in the name of spreading the Gospel and the American Way? Today, the neo-missionary zeal is to Globo-Homo-genize the world with Gay Rites. And this was how Jews managed to make so many neo-spiritual Americans hostile to Russia. Evil Russia doesn’t bend over to Homos and Trannies and take it up the ass like the US, UK, Canada, France, and Germany did before their Jewish masters. All those nations exist only to obey and serve the Jewish Agenda. If Jews say they must convert to Homomania as the new faith, they grovel and comply. Indeed, so-called ‘conservatives’ in the UK say ‘gay marriage is a conservative value’. Whatever Jews want, they get. According to Jewish definition of ‘patriotism’, it means non-Jews must be loyal to Jews and whatever Jews like. To a Jew, a Frenchman who is patriotic to France is not a ‘patriot’ but a ‘far rightist’. But if a Frenchman sucks up to Jews, supports Israel, waves the Homo flag, and pledges to inundate France with millions of Africans as New Frenchmen, then such a Frenchman is ‘patriotic’ since he loyally serves the globalist agenda of Jews.

Anyway, even though Alex Jones isn’t directly hostile to Jews and Zionism, he is very critical of the broad globalist agenda favored by Jews to cemented Jewish Supremacist Hegemony over the world. And that is enough for Jews to attack Alex Jones. Indeed, that’s why Jews also attack Russia despite its pro-Jewish stance. Putin has been very accommodating to Jews and has maintained close relations with Israel. But his Russian nationalism stands in opposition to Jewish Globo-Homo Hegemony, and THAT is enough for Jews to see him as the enemy who must be destroyed. So, it’s not enough for goyim to be nice to Jews. Jews will still hate you if you support agendas and policies disfavored by them. So, it doesn’t matter how much you praise Jews or Israel. If you oppose ‘gay marriage’, Jews hate you because Homomania is their baby, their missionary-proxy of world control. It doesn’t matter if you sing hosannas to Israel 24/7. If you oppose Mass Immigration-Invasion, Jews will see you as a ‘Nazi’ because you stand in opposition to the Jewish strategy of increasing Goy Diversity in order to play divide-and-rule among the gentiles.
By now, it should be obvious that Jews are rather like Hitler and Mao. Impossible to appease. No matter how many favors you do for Jews, it’s never enough because Jews want everything. Also, your niceness is seen by Jews as weakness and stupidity. So, they only feel contempt and more greed and press upon you for further concessions.
This is why it is time for whites to make a clean break with Jewish Power. Now, if there are individual Jews who want to join with white patriots, that’s all fine and well. But, give up all hope that white people can come to any meaningful understanding with the Current Jewish Power. Jews think, ‘We win, you lose’. Jews think, 'we are the horseman, you are the horse'. To Jews, whites will always be whores and horses, or whorses. Also, when Jews are so blatant in hiring anti-white activists like Sarah Jeong for the NYT, it is time to name the Jew. It’s not enough to say the NYT did it. NYT is run by whom? Just say it. As long as Jews are explicitly demeaning whites and bitching all the time that there are ‘too many whites’ in positions of power and privilege, it is time for whites to shout back and say it’s the JEWS who are most disproportionately represented in positions of power and privilege and also that Jews invoke ‘white privilege’ as misdirection to distract the gullible fools from noticing the Real Power concentrated in the hands of globo-homo Jewish Supremacists. We must name the Jew. Indeed, it is downright pathetic that even when Jews are the #1 bashers of Trump and white people, Trump and white people drone on and on about how they love Jews and Israel. Enough already. It’s sickening to see that even after Jews took Alex Jones off the platforms, Jones is being mealymouthed and yapping about ‘China’. It’d be like Stalin bitching about UK after Germany invaded USSR in 1941. You cannot win any war UNLESS you name the enemy and fix upon it as your main target. If someone is shooting at you, you must identify where the bullets are coming from and shoot back at the source. If you willfully refuse to pinpoint the target and shoot at everything but the person shooting at you, you will not only leave your enemy unharmed but get shot and die. We need to wake up and say it like it is. Jews did this. Jews have the real power. Jews are behind the censorship. Jews have monopolistic and oligarchic control over media and platforms. The current situation is obscene in a nation where Jews are only 2% of the population. It is time white people said NO MORE SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL. It’s time they said, WE WILL TREAT JEWS LIKE THEY TREAT US WHITES. WE WILL SEE JEWS LIKE THEY SEE US WHITES. Fight fire with fire. Why does Margaret Dumont always lose in Marx Brothers movies? Because even as the Jewish pranksters mock her and abuse her, she treats them as her dear friends. With the Jewish move on Alex Jones, it’s really over. If whites, patriots, and conservatives don’t name the Jew now, they have no one to blame but themselves.

Now, some will say it’s not only Jews. Apple is run by Tim Cook, an Anglo-Homo. But being homo, he’s part of the Globo-Homo World Order pushed by Jews. Also, in any society, most people fall in line with the Dominant Narrative. In the Soviet Union, everyone had to praise Marx and Lenin to get ahead. There was NO WAY one could ascend the ladder without pledging to the gods of communism. It’s like the Jews who converted to Christianity in the 19th century to get a leg up in society. Back then, Europe was profoundly Christian, and it was unthinkable in many European nations that a non-Christian should enter respectable society or work in government. So, even Jews who really despised Christianity converted to it and gained the credentials to make more money, be admitted to high society, and gain employment in the state.
It’s no different today. With Jew-worship, Homo-worship, and Afro-worship as the Neo-Religion of the West, one must prove one’s credentials as a slavish and servile toady of Jews and their favored icons to make it in society. If not, you aren't allowed in. Also, if you have already gained power and wealth but get exposed as a ‘racist’, ‘anti-Semite’, or ‘homophobe’, the full force of the Jew-run media will come after you to turn you into a non-person. ('Racism' never means what Zionist killers are doing to Palestinians and Arab nations. It doesn't mean Victoria Nuland the Neocon recruiting real neo-Nazis in Ukraine. It's always about Jews accusing OTHERS with their monopoly of media.) And then, all institutions and industries will be pressured to treat you as a non-person as well. We are told we live in a secular liberal democracy, but ours is a neo-religious order with new sacraments and taboos. This is why, even after Jews and their cuck-collaborators deplatformed him, Alex Jones says NOTHING critical about Jews and only mumbles about ‘Chicoms’ and Yellow Peril. But people like Jones must ask at this juncture... "What is there to lose?" When he’s been attacked and removed from so much of the internet, he might as go for the Samson Option and call out on the Jews. If they take you down, go down screaming. Go down spilling the beans on WHO was really behind your downfall. Don’t go your death cowering in fear and pleading for mercy like the victims of Stalin. Go with a loud voice yelling WHO is really behind all the shit. Go out like Tony Montana.


Now, the Jew-run media and Jew-run platforms are saying Alex Jones was removed for ‘hate speech’ and ‘fake news’. But what this really means is that the Power gets to defame anything as ‘hate’ or ‘fake’ in order to justify shutting it down. Of course, these standards don’t apply to the Jew-run media. Never mind all the lies told by Deep State and Media about WMD's that led to the US invasion of Iraq. Never mind all the lies told about Russia and Ukraine. Even now, Jew-run MSM says Russia invaded Georgia when, in fact, Russia retaliated against Georgia's invasion of South Ossetia with the encouragement of Neocon Jews. (And there's no outcry in MSM about IDF death squads killing Palestinians. Nothing about Zionist occupation of Golan Heights that belong to Syria. Nothing about 2018 being the 70th anniversary of Nakba Pogroms that destroyed Palestine.) Never mind that Obama used Neocon Victoria Nuland to recruit Neo-Nazis to pull off a coup to bring down a democratically government in Ukraine. Never mind the US told lies to intervene in Libya that was reduced to a failed state. (And we thought Pearl Harbor was bad stuff.  Did Japan do to the US what the US did to Iraq and Libya? By the way, the US still illegally occupies parts of Syria, and Jews are most triggered when Trump wants to pull out the troops. Jews want Trump as globo-imperialist than American nationalist because it is globo-imperialism that does the bidding of Jewish Supremacism.) Never mind all the lies about Syria to cover up American, Saudi, and Israeli support for terrorists who tore that nation apart. Never mind the lies that Diversity is working out just swell for the EU.

Never mind the media lies about Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman, especially the editing of the phone call to make it seem like Zimmerman was looking for a black guy to hunt down and kill. Never mind the lies of BLM favored by the media. Michael Brown was no ‘gentle giant’, and he never said "Hands up, Don’t shoot". And it is a lie that the main threat to blacks in the US is white cops gunning down innocent blacks. Blacks kill blacks, along with people of other races. Never mind the lies about black crime, calling black thugs ‘youths’ and ‘teens’. Never mind the lies told by Chicago government and media about why the Oakstreet beach was closed. It was because blacks attacked whites, but the Narrative was ‘heat wave’ on a day when the temperature was only 80 degrees. Never mind the lies of Sabrina Rubin Erderly who made Stephen Glass seem like a honest reporter. Erderly’s lies about UVA led to an attack on the innocent fraternity and prompted a media-wide defamation of white fraternities. (By the way, try searching for UVA Rape Hoax and Mark Dice on Youtube. Jews at Youtube and Jews in MSM rigged the algorithms so that the Mark Dice video never shows up, and all you get are Jewish-dominated 'mainstream' News Sources in the search results. Never mind that it was independent internet journalists who cracked that case while MSM showered praise on Sabrina Rubin Erderly as a potential Pulitzer candidate. We are all Palestinians. The West is one big Information West Bank. Occupied territory.) Never mind the lies about Charlottesville. The Unite the Right guys came to make a speech, but the mayor and the police illegally shut down the event and instigated violence by pushing Unite the Right attendees into mobs of Antifa. But the media spin was a complete lie. A total Jewish lie. And then, there is the biggest conspiracy theory in US history, the bullshit about Trump colluding with Russia. It was pushed to prevent any rapprochement between the US and Russia because Jews and Globo-Homo lunatics seek total hegemony and hate Russia as an obstacle. Trump’s idea that the US, as a sovereign nation, should have good relations with Russia as a sovereign nation is an affront to Jews and the Deep State that wants the US to be in globo-imperialist footing to force all nations to submit to Jewish globo-homo hegemony. And of course, the Dotcom bubble and Real Estate bubble were the result of Jewish deregulation of banks and cooked books that fed on false optimism. And when the economy blew up, the very Jews who were most responsible for the mess got their boy Obama to bail out the banks, whereupon Wall Street grew even richer while the rest of the economy scraped by. Compared to all such abuses, it seems Alex Jones’ silly antics did hardly any harm. I know he said something about ‘gay frogs’ and raised alarms about junk food and such stuff. But nothing he said did the kind of damage done to the world by Jews and the Deep State. In fact, it was Alex Jones’ sometimes effective tirades against globalism, neo-imperialism, and the military-industrial complex that made him dangerous to the Establishment of both parties. After all, most GOP guys are cuck-collaborators and whores of monsters like Sheldon Adelson. Even though Jones didn’t have the courage to go all out and call it like it is, the fact is he said JUST ENOUGH to make millions of Americans wake up to the fact that the US is run by a globalist oligarchy with monopoly control of media, academia, finance, and internet. It wasn’t 100% true but at least 50% true. And 50% truth is threatening to those who push 100% fake news all the time.

https://www.rt.com/usa/435271-alex-jones-inforwars-censorship/

When certain communities wanted to ban obscene or seditious material in the name of ‘community values’, Liberals and ACLU attacked the censorship as unconstitutional. Free speech must trump ‘community values’. Pornography must enter every community, they said.

But now, Jews and proggies invoke ‘community standards’ to shut down certain speech. But whose community are they talking about? If Alex Jones had more than 2 million followers on Youtube, that was quite a community, and the members of that community thought Jones was speaking for them. So, ‘community standards’, as used by Jewish tech-oligarchs, is a weasel term. Youtube and Facebook are banning Jones for the interests of Jewish Tribal Interests, not this thing called 'community standards'. After all, if these Jews really believe in all-around niceness, why do they allow all manner of Zionists who justify the ongoing occupation and land-theft in West Bank? Why is Google economically engaged with Israel that uses IDF death squads to gun down Palestinian women and children? Is Zionist Judeo-Nazism okay by the 'community standards' of Facebook and Youtube?

How is that Jews, who make up 2% of US population, get to decide what the COMMUNITY STANDARDS are for all of us? Google banned Jones for the same reason it bans any doodle for Easter. It’s not kosher enough. This is koshering of media and internet.

Now, some will say that Facebook and Youtube are private companies. But the fact is they function as public virtual communities, not least with support of the government. They are used by members to form communities centered around shared values, beliefs, and politics. These have become just as important as real communities. So, when the ‘community standards’ favor certain groups over others, it’s like a town invoking ‘community values’ to ban certain ideas or expressions.

At any rate, whites are beginning to realize what it’s like to be a Palestinian. Palestinians are arbitrarily censored or arrested. They cannot stop Jewish illegals pouring into West Bank. Sound familiar? White support of Zionism was the biggest mistake. Jews don’t show gratitude. Instead, they see what they did to Palestinians and use it as the template for what to do with other goyim.

The only way to fight back is by naming Jewish Power and siding with Palestinians. Jews do stuff like this because they know whites will praise Jews and defend Jews no matter what Jews do to whites. If you hit someone and if your victim still praises you, you will keep hitting him. It is only when he hits back that you will think twice about hitting him again.

Enough is enough. It is time to say WAAP or We Are All Palestinians.

Thursday, August 2, 2018

White American Elites represent the Worst Template for All the World — The Fable of the Gulping Hippo — When Elites no longer lead the Masses of their own kind, it’s Game Over for that People... unless Another Elite rises to represent, defend, and lead the Masses to Independence and Sovereignty

The Fable of the Gulping Hippo
The World Beware. White American Elites are the worst elites in the world, and all nations should be wary of the ways of such an elite. It’s a historical truth that a people are like a shapeless mass and can’t rule themselves. As the Founding Fathers knew, concentration of power may be evil but it’s a necessary evil. The power is like the watchtower. Its elevated and vaunted position allows those on top to see, hear, know, and reach more than the masses of individuals who make up the People. Imagine a village where most people are at ground level. In contrast, a few have access to the top of the tower and can see further than most people. Seeing more and knowing more, those atop the power can warn the people below of the dangers or fortunes far yonder. If an enemy tribe is coming toward the village, those atop the tower can see the threat before anyone on the ground. If a herd of deer or other prey animals appear in the horizon that can feed the village, those atop the tower can spot the good fortune before anyone on the ground.
Indeed, if not for the vision afforded by the tower, the people of the village may not even know of the herd that had passed by near the village. Also, those atop the tower can see everyone in the village, and everyone in the village can see in unison those on the top. At ground level at a gathering or rally, a villager can only see those in close proximity, and these people block all the others behind them. But from the tower, one can see the whole crowd. Those on the tower feel a sense of authority and privilege. And those below are likely to see those on top with a certain respect, even awe.
Now, those atop the tower can try to use their advantageous position for their own self-aggrandizement, and many elites have been like that through the ages. Or, they can be mindful of others in the village and use their elevation and greater reach in vision to serve the community. Thus, they become like the eyes, ears, lips, and brains of a the community that is the body. They speak to the community, they speak for the community, the listen to what the community has to say, and they plan for the community. After all, whatever special gifts those atop the tower may possess, they didn’t build the tower alone. All the community took part in laboring to erect such a tall edifice. And they surely didn’t do it just so the fortunate few could enjoy the cool breeze up above.
In the past, the American elites understood how much their good fortune depended on the people. After all, the elites alone couldn’t chop down trees, plow the fields, reap the harvests, lay down roads, build towns and cities, and etc. The fortunes of the elites relied on the labor of the masses. Of course, this was true of all societies around the world, but the ideal of the Modern West was that the elites must be mindful of those who do much of the hard work. When American economy was mainly agricultural and/or industrial, the elites understood the value of Labor and the Working Man. But as globalism changed so much of the US economy into a game of finance, high tech, and information-sharing(or intelligence-gathering), more and more of the American Labor force became obsolete, not least because (1) globalism could use cheaper foreign labor by outsourcing or mass-immigration (2) much of American Labor degraded under Union corruption, hedonism, & degeneracy(from drug use, family breakdown, feminism, declining white birthrates, and youth culture) and (3) rise of yuppie vanity & homo narcissism led to loss of respect for entire sectors of the economy as suitable only for ‘losers’ or ‘Mexicans’.
But perhaps, most crucial of all, the White American Elites came under the power of the Jewish globalists. Some might say the Jews are now the New Elites of America, but this isn't really true. While it’s true that Jews constitute the most powerful force in the US, they can’t be characterized as ‘American Elites’, no more than the British were really Indian Elites(in British ruled South Asia that once incorporated India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) or Chinese Elites(in Hong Kong) for that matter. Rather, the British Elites in India and Hong Kong were Imperial Elites who ruled over the native masses via local ‘comprador’ elites who willingly collaborated with foreign overlords for self-gain. (To be sure, there could be mass support for foreign rule IF such was deemed far saner and more productive than native rule. It appears most Chinese in Hong Kong preferred British rule to that of Mainland China ruled by madman Mao.) In a similar vein, Jewish elites in the US are not really American Elites as they’re part of a vast worldwide network of power that could be called the Empire of Judea or EOJ. Jewish overlords and elites in the US don’t feel primarily as Americans. They feel as Jews, and they feel closer to fellow Jews around the world than with fellow Americans of non-Jewish stock. Jews in NY and LA feel closer to Jews in London, Paris, and Tel Aviv than to non-Jewish Americans in Idaho, West Virginia, Utah, Iowa, Tennessee, and etc. Indeed, the very fact that Jews want to flood the US with endless immigration-invasion goes to show their outlook is global than national. Jews don’t value any population that could be deemed as Core America. Jews don’t care about the history of Core America that was white, European(non-Jewish), and Christian. If they feel any sense of connection to that America, they would try to defend and preserve it. But they not only feel no love for it but feel much hatred and resentment. For Jews, Wasps will always be associated with better-looking and taller Anglos who didn’t let their grandpas into Golf-n-Country Clubs or didn’t let their pretty shikse daughters marry Jewish boys. And Jews will always associate White Ethnics with the big Polish Catholic lunkhead who called Jewish kids ‘Christ-killer’ and maybe stole some lunch money from nerdy neurotic kids named Isaac.
Of course, Jews see Mexicans as just losers who should pick tomatoes and shut up. Jews do prize blacks to the extent that blacks are lucrative in sports and music, two industries controlled by Jews, but Jews don’t worry too much about the Negroes because most Negroes can’t rise very high, even with ‘affirmative action’ wind behind their backs. (The main black threat to Jews is that Jewish girls are creating a new ‘covenant’ centered around their vaginas on the basis of ‘what does my pooter want’, and for many Jewish girls, it’s big Negro dong. So, perhaps, Jewish power will really be brought down by black dongs. As Jewish girls turn into wild skanks chasing after Negro dongs, Jewish boys will go with more Asian women, and their kids will be born with mellow yellow genes that are lacking in the chutzpah that's been so integral to Jewish power. After all, intelligence alone without the rocket boosters of pushiness lacks motivation to go very far. Indeed, consider the fall of the Episcopalians who had the intelligence but not the pushy drive to have it all and crush all competition.)

Jews never really became Americans. They never assimilated into the Core America as founded and developed by Anglo-Americans. It was too ‘gentile’ and too ‘Christian’ for the Jews with their strong individual egos and ethnocentric identity. Indeed, if later whites from Eastern and Southern parts of Europe came with sense of ethnicity, Jews came with a sense of ethnocentrism. Ethnicity can dissolve into the Larger Identity of a nation, but ethnocentrism resists being absorbed into something else. So, if most white ethnic groups were digested into White Anglo-America, Jews remained apart as a people and culture. If white Christians had long ago adopted a religion that arose in the Near East, Jews have always had a direct cultural and genetic link with the Near East. If whites adopted a heretical variant of Judaism, Jews founded a community 1500 yrs before Christ. As far as Jews were concerned, Christianity was the biggest ‘cultural appropriation’ of all time. It is a Stolen Religion as far as Jews are concerned. (It is no wonder than Martin Bernal the Jewish scholar goes even further and says that even the pagan core of Western Civilization was stolen from Africa and Near East in his book ‘Black Athena’, which was originally titled ‘African Athena’.)
Also, if whites have genetic roots in Europe, Ashkenazi Jews have been half-European and half-Semitic. So, Jews have always been somewhat ‘Zeligish’ and dualistic about their racial identity. They were both whites and Semites, a perception shared by Jews and all-whites alike. Then, it is not surprising that Jews didn’t feel like assimilating like other white ethnic groups in the US. Granted, some Jews did become racially and culturally mixed with whites. They Anglo-ized their names and took on Wasp manners and attitudes. But as more and more Jews arrived, especially from Eastern Europe, a distinct Immigrant-Jewish-Identity formed that overtook the earlier mode of Jewishness that leaned more toward assimilation. Yet, Jews knew they couldn’t get very far with mere isolation in their own ghettos. To rise in wealth and power, they had to work with whites and peoples around the world. So, Jews developed a powerful ethnocentric core and an adaptive cosmopolitan shell. For a time, certain Jewish scholars were especially fascinated with the Japanese who seemed to handle modernity in a similar way: Acting Western with foreigners but keeping it very Japanese at home and within their own community. But if Japanese could remain meaningfully Japanese only in Japan, Jews managed this even outside as minorities in other nations. After all, Japanese-Americans are utterly deracinated and deculturalized; they are cucky-san like Francis Fukuyama. Paradoxically, Jewish ethno-centrism strengthened Jewish cosmopolitanism and vice versa. Because cosmopolitanism tends to weaken and erase identity and culture, secular Jews felt they had to make an extra-effort to preserve and pass down their Jewishness. (In a truly inspired scene in A SERIOUS MAN by the Coen Brothers, it’s the Jewish ritual that keeps the community together and the culture intact because, without it, the formative culture for the children would be TV shows, drugs, rock music, and etc. Despite all such deracinating and degenerative forces, the father manages to pass down something ethnic, cultural, and spiritual through the ritual of the Bar Mitzvah.) And because Jews were so ethno-centric, they had to make an extra effort to be ‘liberal’ and ‘open-minded’ with other peoples. Because Jews needed both modes for success and power(and sometimes for survival) and because the modes were opposites, Jews had to work against ethnocentrism for cosmopolitanism(in dealing with goyim) and work against cosmopolitanism for ethnocentrism(in their own hearts). Granted, Jews eventually managed to persuade a lot of Americans that Jewishness-Zionism-Israel is as American as Apple Pie. Therefore, Jews can now be openly ethnocentric and cosmopolitan at the same time. But how long can this serious contradiction last?


To better understand the Jew, consider The Fable of the Gulping Hippo. Whatever the Gulping Hippo eats turns into the Hippo. This shouldn’t surprise us as this is true of all of organisms. When we eat carrots, we don't turn into carrots, e.g. our fingers sprout into carrots and our skin turns orange. When we eat beef or fish, we don’t turn cow-like or fish-like. We can eat 100 fish over several months, but we remain human. We don’t develop gills or scales or want to live in water. We can eat lots of steaks, but we won’t suddenly go ‘moo’ like cows or grow horns or develop an appetite for hay. Instead, whatever we eat turns into us. The proteins and vitamins are broken down and absorbed into our body. They become digested and processed into our bodily systems. And it’s the same with the Gulping Hippo. Whatever the Hippo eats turns into it. Now, this Gulping Hippo is an enviable beast. It is big and strong. And other creatures admire the Hippo so much that they want to be part of it. So, one day, the Gulping Hippo tells the other creatures that they are welcome to enter its mouth to its stomach. The Hippo’s melting-pot stomach will digest all of them and turn them into parts of the hippo. Other creatures like this idea of becoming one with the hippo. So, when the Gulping Hippo opens its mouth wide, other animals come onboard. Rabbits, badgers, raccoons, chipmunks, squirrels, lizards, frogs, skunks, opossums, gophers, ducks, sparrows, and etc. all head into the Hippo’s mouth. The Hippo chomps on all of them and gulps them down. Its stomach processes and digests them, and they are absorbed by the hippo’s body. So, it doesn’t matter how many kinds of animals the hippo eats. It remains hippo while growing larger. Just because the hippo ate a dozen rabbits doesn’t make it rabbity. Just because the hippo ate a bear doesn’t make it a bear. To be sure, there is one creature the hippo has failed to digest all these years, and it’s a gorilla. Yes, sometime back, the Hippo had this idea of swallowing a gorilla thinking the ghastly ape would be nutritious, but indigestible simian has been stuck in the digestive tract since. But the Gulping Hippo has been able to eat other creatures and process them in its melting-pot-stomach into nutrients for its body. So, Hippo eats all sorts of creatures and uses them as nutritious building blocks to grow bigger and stronger as a hippo.
But one day, the Hippo came upon the hook worm. Hippo thought, "this doesn’t look very tasty", but the hookworm told the Hippo, "You should eat me. I would be most happy to be processed by your melting-pot-stomach and become a part of you... just like all the other creatures." But the Hippo eyed the hookworm and thought, "But this fella looks rather odd." The hookworm asked the Hippo why it’s so afraid. After all, the hookworm is smaller than other creatures that the hippo ate, such as racoons, rabbits, owls, wombats, gophers, bears, and hogs. I mean, what is a tiny hookworm? Is the big and mighty hippo too chicken to try a little hookworm? Thus assured, the Hippo decides to swallow a bunch of hookworms. The hookworms went into the stomach of the hippo, but instead of being digested like earlier creatures, it sank its hooks into the stomach of the hippo and began to suck on its blood. The hippo thought the hookworms were digested and became part of the hippo, but the hookworms refused to surrender their hookworm-ness and be digested by the Hippo. Hookworms clung to their hookworminess and, if anything, felt that the Hippo existed to feed the hookworms, the best organisms in the world. The hippo began to feel strange. It felt more drained of strength. Also, it began to notice blood in its stools. Because the hippo felt weaker, it felt the need to swallow more and more creatures, but its digestion was no longer working like it used to. So, the new creatures the hippo ate were only half-digested and caused all sorts of stomach-aches. Also, the hookworms released certain viruses that traveled to the brains of the hippo and began to take over the functions. The viruses told the brains to just lay the hippo body down and not defend itself from other creatures. Until then, the hippo was a powerful beast that devoured other creatures but made sure no other creature was able to devour it. So, the hippo digested other creatures to turn them into part of hippo-nes but wouldn’t allow other animals to take a bite of the hippo. If anything, when a Japanese monkey chucked a spear at the hippo’s butt once, the hippo got so mad that it stampeded over the hapless monkey and turned it into a pancake. Indeed, the hippo’s hide was thick and tough, like a wall between Israel and West Bank. But the viruses in the Hippo’s brains whispered that it’s wrong for the hippo to be hostile to other creatures that just want to play with the hippo. The hippo should stop fighting or fending off other creatures that seem to have a taste for hippo meat. If anything, the hippo should be flattered that such creatures love hippo flesh. The hippo should be ‘tolerant’ and ‘inclusive’ of the would-be-eaters-of-hippo. Also, the hookworms release certain chemicals that agitate the gorilla in the Hippo’s belly into acting wild and crazy. So, the Gulping Hippo increasingly feels weak from loss of blood to the hookworms, increasingly perturbed by some crazy-ass gorilla beating its chest, and increasingly deluded that it should stop defending itself from predators & scavengers and just lie down and rest. So, what happens? Lions, hyenas, jackals, wild dogs, leopards, weasels, fire ants, badgers, and etc. move towards the Hippo and begin to devour it like a helpless beached whale. And that’s how the Gulping Hippo died. What happened to the Hookworms? When the other creatures at the hippo’s innards, the hookworms entered their stomached and caused new havoc.

So, you understand how Jews destroyed America. Until 1965, the US mostly took in assimilate-able fellow whites. Though Southern and Eastern Europeans posed some problems, they were fellow whites and once they adopted the American Way, they were more or less like the original white Americans. They were digested into Anglo-Germanic America. But Jews were different. They remained Jewish first and American second. They didn’t see America as something to melt into. They saw America as a trove of goy treasures to be melted down into gold for Jewish pockets. If Anglos thought Jews would be digestible like Poles, Lithuanians, Slavic Russians, Greeks, French, and etc., they were dead wrong. Jews were like hookworms that resisted digestion and, if anything, sucked on the blood of the host. Also, Jews took over the Anglo-American mind and reprogrammed Core Americanism into some ‘propositional’ and ‘open borders’ ideology whereupon White America would no longer have the right or means to defend and preserve itself. Thus, America went from a strong white hippo that pushed away invaders to a hapless hippo(as beached whale) that welcomes all manner of creatures to come and devour it in the name of ‘diversity’. (Whites have been told that Diversity is good because of More Restaurants, but the real menu of globalism is white nations fed to non-whites of the world who are steered into white nations by Jewish globalists.)
The Hippo once used to devour digestible creatures to make itself bigger and stronger. The creatures were digested to add to Hippo-ness. But now, the hippo is devoured by others to become parts of other creatures. It’s like the American Southwest is now being devoured by Mexicans to make it more Mexican. And parts of Minnesota and Maine are now being devoured by Somalians to make them more like Somalia. This is what happens when you swallow Jewish hookworms.

In the Current US, the white elites are not only useless but dangerous as a template for the rest of the world. White elites no longer exist to represent, lead, serve, and defend the white masses. They no longer play the Moses-role and David-role for whites. As power and means are concentrated in the elites, a people cannot do anything without them. It’s like a military cannot function without hierarchy and chain of command. A good army has generals who remain loyal to their own side and care about the men. If generals just go off the play golf and tell the soldiers to fight on their own, the army will lose. Individual soldiers may be tough, but they cannot coordinate battle plans as individuals. They need leaders and chain of command that allows for larger strategy, communication, coordination, and logistics. Take the film SEVEN SAMURAI. The seven swordsmen on their own cannot defend the village from 40 bandits, some of whom have guns. The battle will ultimately have to depend on the peasants learning to fight and showing courage. So, why do the peasants need the samurai so much? Because the peasants, though numerous, don’t know anything about organization, leadership, fighting, and strategy. So, in hiring samurai, they hired elites to lead them. In the Old Testament, the Jews are initially without kings. But as their numbers swell and their enemies multiply, Jews are in need of more organization and strategy. They need kings and ruling elites. This is why a people cannot do without elites. It’s like a headless chicken. And today, white people are like a headless chicken. Jews took over America, but they feel no great unity with white people. Indeed, Jews see themselves as globalist supremacist masters. If they feel any real love for any nation, it is Israel. If anything, Jews are hellbent on destroying Europe with massive African and Muslim immigration-invasion. Only Israel is given Pass-Over rights from the plague of Afro-Islamo Mass Invasion, just like only Jewish sons were protected from God’s Wrath when Moses returned to Egypt.

White elites are no longer the ruling class in America. Many of them still have lots of wealth, but they morally cuck out to Jews, blacks, and Diversity because of the change in the Official Narrative that made whites mainly responsible, indeed ‘guilty’, for the ‘sins’ and problems of America. Jews not only have wealth and power to out-match those of white elites but they occupy the ‘sacerdotal’ positions of society. As the Holocaust People, they strut around and sermonize as if each and every Jew is the new messiah. If white elites are cursed with the sin of ‘white guilt’, it means their wealth and advantages are morally illegitimate due to ‘crimes’ of their ancestors or their ‘white privilege’. Therefore, they mustn’t be proud or positive about their identity, heritage, and culture. Since white consciousness is out of the question, white elites cannot be the leaders of white people or the white race. If anything, they must cut ties to fellow whites on the political and cultural level. To justify their white wealth despite the burden of ‘white guilt’, they can use their power and wealth to lend aid or support only to non-whites. It’s like Bill Gates Foundation offers NOTHING to whites, no matter how poor, needy, and lost they are.
If white elites don’t particularly want to do favors for blacks, browns, or Diversity, they can partially redeem themselves by sucking up to the Jewish Globalist Overlords of the Empire of Judea, of which the US is now a colony. How things have changed. There was a time when white elites ruled the US, felt positive about whiteness, and represented, led, and defended white Americans(from foreign threats and from the tougher and stronger blacks). But today, white elites don’t rule the US, feel negative about whiteness, snub & insult fellow white brethren, only offer comfort to blacks & non-whites, and suck up to Jews(and even homos).

Such being the status of the White Elites in the US, The Way of the American White Elites is the most terrible template for national elites of any nation. Take Turkey. Suppose Turks decide to follow the American White Elite Way. Suppose Turks allow Jews or some minority to gain dominant power in Turkey. Suppose Turks allow this new elite to emphasize only the darkest and most tragic aspects of Turkish history and instill Turkish elites with guilt and shame about being Turk. So, no matter how much wealth and privilege a Turk gains, he feels shame and rejects the idea that Turkish elites should defend Turkishness and represent/defend fellow Turks in the middle and bottom. So, there is no unity and connection Turkish elites and masses. If anything, Turkish elites they must care more about non-Turks like the Kurds and even welcome massive immigration-invasion of non-Turks into Turkey with the hope of turning Turks into a minority in their own nation. And the Turkish elites shower praise and adoration on the non-Turks while heaping abuse on Turkish patriots who call for the demographic, cultural, and territorial preservation of Turkey. Indeed, the patriots are caricatured as the 'far right'. And, most of all, the Turkish elites don’t see themselves as the rulers of Turkey but cuck-collaborators to the globo-minority overlords who’ve gained real power in Turkey through control of finance, media, entertainment, education, vice industries, and much else. And the Turkish elites allow the globo-minority elites to replace Islam with Homomania and to teach kids from a young age that nothing is more sacred in the world than the homo anus, the Negro booty-and-dong, and Jewish soul. Well, what would happen to Turkey in a matter of decades? The total fading of a civilization from history, that’s what.

Now, let’s apply the White American Elite Template to Vietnam. What would happen to that country if the Vietnamese Elites were to emulate White American Elites? They would allow a foreign globalist elite to take the real power in Vietnam. This minority would take over Vietnamese banking, media, academia, and government(by buying up all the whore politicians). And this minority will change the Narrative and instill Vietnamese with ‘yellow guilt’. Feeling guilt and shame, the Vietnamese elites would no longer believe in the feasibility of promoting Vietnamese pride or self-respect. Indeed, Vietnamese identity and consciousness would be seen as ‘racist’, ‘hateful’, ‘ugly’, and ‘reactionary’. So, even though Vietnamese can still get rich and gain elite status, the Viet elites can no longer feel pride in their identity or feel a sense of unity and solidarity with their own people. Indeed, the elites come to see the Vietnamese masses as ‘deplorables’ for clinging to their Vietnamese identity. And then, the Vietnamese elites believe their own ‘deplorable’ people must be replaced by Diversity from all over the world. Since Vietnamese-ness is associated with ‘guilt’, the only redemption is for Vietnam to De-Vietnamize itself. And Vietnamese elites must see themselves as ‘global citizens’ than as Vietnamese patriots and leaders. They no longer represent, serve, and defend their own people. They only care about their own wealth and privilege that, under the New Narrative, can be morally justified ONLY BY the Viet support of mass immigration-invasion and Homomania. The Vietnamese masses feel lost as there is no longer an elite to lead them. And many of them come under PC brainwashing as the elites, taking their cue from globalist overlords, replace patriotic education with PC, anti-national self-hatred, and Homomania. How long would Vietnam last as a nation? Not long.

Indeed, if any nation’s elites follow in the footsteps of the white American elites(who are putty in the hands of Jews), it will spell doom for their nation. There are lots of great things about America, but by far the worst element of Current America is the Way of the White Elites. It is the worst kind of Elite Behavior in the world, but it has become the template for nearly all Western European nations and even possibly nations like Japan that remain under the thumb of the US. Whatever may be wrong with China, Russia, Iran, Turkey, and Israel, they still have national elites who feel a direct connection to their own people, feel pride and self-respect about their identity and culture, and believe the main duty of the national elites is to serve and defend their own people. Typical members of the US elites are Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Paul Ryan, Bill Gates, John Brennan, Mitt Romney, Jeff Bezos, Andrew Cuomo, Anderson Cooper(the Pooper), and etc. Now, what do all such goy white elites have in common? They feel no positivity about whiteness or European-ness. They have no connection with their own race and culture. They suck up to Jewish globalist overlords. Their definition of ‘American’ has more to do with ‘New Americans to shop for from around the world’ than with Historic White Americans who founded and built the nation. And they care more about Homomania as new religion than about Christianity. And they repeat the mantra, ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ to justify their total abandonment of their own race and ethnic kin. Of course, they are all zealously committed to Israel being a Jewish state, but then, such hypocrisy is to be expected from decadent, degenerate, corrupted, and craven elites who, having lost moral legitimacy in terms of identity, believe they can keep their loot only by baptizing their whiteness in a tub of PC and Diversity.

It is precisely because the White American Elites got so useless that Jews thought they won for all time. Jews figured that the white elites would cuck out to Jews. And the white masses, being no longer represented and defended by white elites, would lose heart, lose their minds, lose their senses, become addicted to drugs, race-mix with Negroes, and be replaced by endless tides of Diversity that would make any united humanity against Jews nearly impossible. Indeed, Jewish globalist elites believe that the ONLY thing standing between Jews and total-eternal power is the white majority. Even if most white Americans weren't anti-Jewish, there is the possibility that they could be, especially as Jews get richer, nastier, and more supremacist. With Jewish power in hyper-drive, the ONLY guarantee for permanent Jewish supremacy is Diversity because a people divided along ethnic and cultural lines cannot come together to form a united bloc. This is why Jews also pushed Diversity on Europe. But Donald Trump won.

Now, Trump may very well fail in the end, and Jews may get what they want. But what Trump and the Alt Right represented was the awakening realization that the White American Elites are utterly useless to White People, many of whom are hungry for a true elite that can inspire and lead white people into Emancipation from the Tyranny of the Empire of Judea.
This is why Jews are so committed to stamping out the Alt Right and destroying Donald Trump anyway they can. Jews fear the emergence of a Real White Elite that believes in leading and defending white people. Such White Unity would mean the end of Jewish Supremacism because white head would serve the white body and white body would serve the white head. Mind and body would be one. In order for Jews to maintain their supremacism, they must make sure that the white mind serves the Jewish super-mind and that the white body has no white mind to lead it, thereby growing weak and dying.

Jews fear that Trump is secretly using Putinism as his personal template. What is the Putinist template? It is that Putin as son of Russia and leader of Russians must put the interest of his people, culture, and land above all else. Such nationalism is threatening to Jewish globalist supremacism that says all nations exist to primarily to serve Jews as the superior god-like race.