Saturday, March 23, 2019
Commentary on "Elite White Privilege"(by Audacious Epigone) & the Jewish Strategy of Power by Elite Control and Demographic Manipulation
The Mandate for Palestine was a dress rehearsal for something much bigger.
Mandate for the West(and then the Rest).
Mandate for Palestine led to eventual Jewish demographic takeover of Palestine to be reconstituted as Israel, the Jewish state, the only part of the world deserving of national identity and right of territory. Jews are mono-nationalist. Only their nationalism is true nationalism. All other nationalisms are false and must be dissolved. Jews denounce on poly-nationalism like Jewish monotheism reviled all pagan idols as false gods.
Mandate for the West is to eventually replace native-whites(in Europe) and founder-whites(in North America & Australia) with masses of non-whites. How does this benefit Jews? Diversity will make cohesive nationalism impossible in white nations. Diversity will create cracks and fissures, and Jewish elites get to pit various sides against one another while taking the lion share of the prize.
Imagine a nation as a Spartan military unit. United and strong, standing together with shields and spears. Very difficult for outsider-enemy to penetrate the phalanx. But imagine a rag-tag bunch of troops of diversity. They would never stand and fight together. As they push each other, cracks form among them, allowing for easy penetration by the enemy.
Mandate for the West thus favors Jewish power in the long run.
Finally, there is Mandate for the Rest. As non-whites flock to the West(the Metropole), they take on PC ideology and globo-homo POZ and export them back to their home countries. In time, even the nations of their origin turn globo-homo and worship diversity. They too allow massive immigration-invasion, and diversity leads to divisions and cracks, and Jewish power can penetrate, exploit the differences, and take over. After Europe, it will be smaller East Asian nations that will fall, esp Japan, S Korea, and Taiwan as yellow dogs are most imitative of the West as model.
Jews think big. With prophetic minds, they look ahead to their grand chess plan for the world.
Audacious Epigone: If the new populations view them as especially egregious examples of the old population and the old population views them as traitorous backstabbers, I’m not sure that works out particularly well for them in the end.
It works out because 'new populations' are diverse. Even if they come to envy and resent Jews, they will be at loggerheads with one another. Browns, yellows, and blacks don't see eye to eye. Neither do Chinese and Hindus. And even among browns, there are so many gradations of identity and color(flimsily held together only by shared resentment of higher-achieving 'gringo' or 'yanqui'). Puerto Ricans don't have much in common with Indios from Guatemala. So, they will be more divided among their own kind than against Jews. Also, as Jews are on top and will remain there due to higher IQ, non-Jews know they must suck up to Jews to gain access into the uber-sphere. Besides, Jews can exploit the 'new people vs old people' dichotomy indefinitely as immigration-invasion is to be endless. So, even as new people settle and evolve into old people, there will be ever more new peoples.
As for old people, Jews only need the collaboration of the elites. Masses don't count for beans UNLESS there is a massive populist revolt with pitchforks(which is rare in history like asteroids hitting the earth). The fact is white elites are willing to sell their souls to Jews for financial gains and on insta-moral grounds. If you're a white cuck and serve Jewish Power, there are lots of prizes. Paul Ryan will make a killing as a lobbyist. Also, as Jews are the Eternally Holy People of Shoah, white cuck elites feel 'cleansed' and 'baptized' by rubbing shoulders with Jews, especially as the Jewish-controlled media and academia made whites out to be uniquely tainted by history. As the result, whites need atonement and salvation, and one quick way to get it is by sucking up to holy People of Shoah. "Look, I got some Jew Magic on me!" Since white elites suck up to Jews more than the white masses do, it creates the impression of 'good whites' at the top and 'bad deplorable whites' on the bottom. This has the effect of making 'good white elites' serve Jews than represent 'bad white people', who Jews say must be replaced. It divides whites along class lines.
Mass-Immigration-Invasion of non-whites is the final nail in the Jewish Strategy for Total Power.
Jews had the unique potential of rapidly gaining the dominant position in the US. Now, how could they when they were only 2% of the population? I mean there was no chance that the Jewish 2% of US could elect a Jewish president. The Irish had the numbers to take over many big cities. Jews didn't. Even in NY, they are like 20% of the population. Jews gained power not by elections but by taking over elite institutions. Only they could have done this due to combination of high IQ, chutzpah, and big think. Also, they could pass as whites, which made it more acceptable to the white majority(than if Asians tried it, but then Asians lack chutzpah and are less intelligent than Jews). So, Jews used the bypass method of power. Just gain control of elites, and you gain control of society. Selection than election. With Jewish control of media, law firm, finance, entertainment, vice industries, real estate, and etc, they could buy off any politician of either political party. Also, with control of media, they could smear and destroy anyone. And, Jews spread the notion of 'antisemitism' that says anyone who notices nefarious Jewish influence is a 'nazi' while anyone who serves Jews 24/7 is the most wonderful goy. Since the Shoah Narrative made Jews out to be holy and since flattering Jews could be rewarded with blessings of approval from the holiest people, it became De Rigueur for whites to roll over before Jews for pats on the head. So, everyone in power became cucks to Jews.
But Jews still felt nervous because having elite power alone doesn't secure permanence. This was evident in the history of the British Empire. The Brits gained control of non-white territories by bullying and buying off the local elites. So, if the Brits could control their puppet leaders in Asia, Africa, and Middle East, they had control of all the territories and all the populace as most people are sheeple. BUT, there was the chance that a real national leader might arise and challenge the cuck-collaborators and the Empire. Such a leader may rouse up the masses... like what happened in Cuba. The US had TOTAL control of most of the political and economic big-shots in Cuba. By scheming with the cream at the top, US could effectively milk all of Cuba. But Fidel Castro and others came along and they led the national masses to victory against the Cuba elites... and this spelled doom for American influence as well because US had put all its eggs in the elite-basket. Once the Cuban elites fell, US influence was gone as well.
This is why Jews aren't content with elite power alone. If white masses reject the current white elites, they also reject Jewish power that is mainly attached to white elites than to white masses. At least in the past when US was ruled by white Christians, there was a connection between white Christian rulers and white Christian masses. But will white Christians, for the long haul, accept Jewish rulers? For the time being, it seems whites are pro-Jewish and support Israel, but could this last indefinitely, esp when there's mounting evidence of vile and nasty Jewish behavior in so many sectors, not least against whites who, besides, are often berated by (((fellow whites)))? What if white masses lose confidence in their own leaders as a bunch of 'cuck-collaborators' and long for an American Castro or Putin? This is why Jews hated Donald Trump with such virulence(even though he turned out to be just another cucky-wuck). Trump ran on America First that implicitly said a white guy like him should reconnect with and protect the traditional (white) American nation. Jews called Trump 'literally Hitler', and even though that is hysterical, there is a kernel of truth to the notion that Trump is figuratively Hitler. After all, there was the nationalist element in Hitlerism that called for unity of German elites and German masses(a good idea before the pathological nut decided to shift into imperialist mode). Hitler was a bad example of it, but there is nothing more effective against imperialism than national unity between leaders and masses. US went from empire to colony of empire. During the Cold War, it was USSR empire vs US empire. After the Cold War, US became a colony of an even bigger empire: Empire of Judea with networks all across US, Canada, Latin America, EU, Russia, Israel, and etc. So, EOJ(Empire of Judea) wants the white elites to serve the empire -- like British expected Hong Kong elites to serve the British Empire than represent Chinese nationalism -- than reconnect with their own kind.
The way Jews see it, AS LONG AS there is a white majority in the US, there is a 'chance', even if a slim one, that white elites and white masses may unite against the Jews. Or, a new white elite will arise(like Castro and others did in Cuba) to reject the cuck-elites. (Alt Right had this chance, but idiot Richard Spencer allied with neo-Nazi morons and yammered endlessly about a need for Faustian white neo-imperialist supremacism.) Jews believe that securing elite power isn't enough. If white elites stop collaborating with Jews or if they are rejected by white masses who demand a new white elite that is actually responsive to white needs, Jewish elite power will fail like American power in Cuba. As the existing cuck-elite falls, so will its master and sponsor.
So, Jews feel that they must secure demographic power as well. But how can they when there's no way Jews can be the majority of any nation except Israel? This is where Diversity enters the picture. Jews know from the Austro-Hungarian Empire that Diversity can be useful to Jews. Recall that most groups in that empire distrusted and even hated Jews.... but they also hated one another and were thus unable to unite against Jewish power and influence. Diversity means Jews can pit whites vs blacks, whites vs yellows, whites vs Hindus, whites vs Muslims, whites vs browns, blacks vs browns, blacks vs yellows, blacks vs hindus, blacks vs Muslims, browns vs yellows, browns vs Hindus, browns vs Muslims, etc. Sure, there is some POC talk about unity of non-whites against whites/Jews, but it's mostly empty noise because non-whites don't see eye-to-eye on many subjects... such as Affirmative Action.
Imagine the NY Giants playing a team made up of players of various teams. All the Giants are playing for their side against their opposing team. In contrast, the diverse players of the other team, while playing against the Giants, are also playing against one another, which makes it impossible for them to form a cohesive team. Giants have a huge advantage.
Jews are masters at splitting the goyim between elites and masses. Jews did this with whites and can do it to ANY goy group. White elites like Paul Ryan, Mitt Romney, Hillary Clinton, and Beta O'Dork do NOTHING for whites. Their main priority is being part of the Privilege Club, and so, they suck up to Jews.
The same can be done with ANY group. Notice how Hindu- and Chinese-American elites in the US are total suck-ass dogs of Jewish Power. Once they've been let into the Power Club, their main priority is to BELONG(be an insider), and that means sucking up to Jews while snubbing their own people. Look at Fareed Zakaria. This non-white brownie has been let into the Power Club, and he beats the drums for Wars for Israel. The one time he praised Trump was when missiles were fired into Syria.
Sunday, March 17, 2019
Jewish Behavior goes Furthest in Promoting 'Antisemitic Tropes' — Why the Jewish-Supremacist Globo-Homo Elites HATE Tucker Carlson so very much — Globalese Decoded
For any serious observer of American Power, it should be obvious that Jews are the ruling elites, or the Real Supremacists. Indeed, all this Jewish kvetching about 'antisemitism' or 'antisemitic tropes' is pretty amusing when, if anything, their own behavior and deeds do most to validate those 'tropes' or 'stereotypes'. Do a little mental experiment:
Could one argue that Jews are the biggest ‘anti-Semites’ because Jewish behavior and actions validate ‘antisemitic tropes’?
Antisemitic Trope: Jews control the media and spread propaganda.
Well, Jews do control the media and spread much fake news(esp against Russia, Iran, Syria, Christians, and patriotic white people). Now, why are Jews perpetuating and validating an ‘antisemitic trope’ by acting it out? Why do they control the media and abuse it much?
Antisemitic Trope: Jews use white nations to wage Wars for Israel.
Well, Jews do use the US military and financial system as hammer against any nation hated by Israel and Jewish supremacists. Just ask myriad peoples of Middle East who've been gravely affected by Jewish stranglehold of US foreign policy and financial power. Now, why are Jews acting in a way that perpetuates and validates an ‘antisemitic trope’?
Antisemitic Trope: Jews are trying to demographically replace whites with non-whites in the West.
Well, Jews are totally for Open Borders in US, EU, Australia, and Canada... just like they push Open Borders on West Bank: Jews in Israel and from around the world can freely invade and settle in West Bank, but Palestinians in West Bank cannot freely enter Israel(formerly Palestine prior to Nakba pogroms). Zionist caravans pour into West Bank endlessly to grab more land. And Palestinians cannot say NO, just like whites in the West can't say NO. In the US and EU, non-white immigration-invasion, or the Great Replacement, has the full blessing of Jewish supremacist power. Jews brashly demand open borders for goy nations, especially prosperous white ones. Now, by acting thus, why are Jews validating an ‘antisemitic trope’?
Antisemitic Trope: Jews control banking and use deep state connections to favor and bail out banks that are too big to fail, or Too Jewish To Fail.
Well, there were numerous examples of Wall Street banks, many of them controlled by Jews, getting off scot-free after the 2008 financial meltdown(that was mainly caused by globalist banks). Jews remained above the law because of the collusion of Jewish media, banks, courts, and deep state. Now, why did Jews act in a way that only perpetuated and validated an ‘antisemitic trope’?
Antisemitic Trope: Jews use popular culture and advertising to subvert the morality of goyim and addict them to vice such as drugs, pornography, sexual degeneracy, and Homomania.
Well, Jews do control Hollywood, gambling, and pornography. Jews played a huge role in organized crime in US, Western Europe, and Russia. Certain Jewish-run pharmaceuticals have concocted drugs that were meant to be addictive to white people and cause White Death. Most homo-supremacist organizations are funded and led by Jews, and they spread decadence all over the world. Now, why are Jews acting in ways that perpetuate and validate an 'antisemitic' trope?
And so on and on.
(Btw, imagine Germans spreading the notion of 'Anti-German trope' and then denouncing anyone who mentions Germany's role in World War I, World War II, and the Shoah as examples of 'Anti-German tropes' that spread hurtful stereotypes of Germans as vile warmongers, imperialists, and mass killers. Ridiculous, eh? Well, that is how Jews play the game by throwing hissy fits about 'Antisemitic tropes'. Even if something is TOTALLY TRUE on matters of Jewish power and its abuses, it must not be mentioned because it is 'offensive' as an 'antisemitic trope'. Ironically, Jewish condemnation of 'antisemitism' cannot exist without Jews stereotyping all whites and all of white history as pathologically prejudiced. Indeed, the biggest canard of all time is the stereotyping all whites and white history as 'antisemitic', which would suggest that Jews were always pure-as-snow and whites were dirty-as-mud in their dealings with one another. Jews invoke 'antisemitism' not so much to prevent prejudice against Jews but to promote prejudice against all whites as 'anti-Semites'. The notion of 'antisemitism' is an 'anti-white trope' that would have us believe that whites have especially sick and demented souls that just want to target and attack totally innocent people. In fact, Jewish-white relations were fraught with suspicions and hostilities on BOTH sides. If whites should be careful not to blame Jews for everything, Jews should be careful not to blame whites for everything. But as the game is played, Jews wield the whip tirelessly while whites grovel in pathetic atonement. If anything is pathological, it is white slavishness to Jews in the current order.)
It seems that the first step we must take to stamp out the evil of ‘antisemitism’ is to persuade or compel Jews to stop perpetuating and validating so many ‘antisemitic tropes’ by deeds and action. The way Jews are going, they are serving in the capacity of the Biggest Anti-Semites because they carry out so many deeds that only go to further perpetuate and validate ‘antisemitic tropes’.
Anyway, the US is a Jewish Supremacist state, and Jews make a big fuss about 'white privilege'(along with Russia threat, Muslim threat, Yellow Peril China threat, etc.) as misdirection so that the duped masses won't notice Jewish power. Jews rule America, and there are basically four kinds of peoples on this issue. (1) Those who know(and most Jews know the truth) but won't admit it or discuss it lest they lose their jobs and status in hyper-competitive world of 21st century globalism. (2) Those who still don't know because they get all their news and ideas from Jewish-controlled media and academia. (3) Those who know and praise it as the greatest blessing. Whether it's Joe Biden thanking Jews for spreading the wonders of Homomania or Christian Zionists worshiping Israel & Zionism as the greatest things since bagel and cream cheese, they know and bow down low. (4) Those who know the truth and have long ago realized that Jewish Power is in vile and pernicious supremacist mode and is indeed the greatest force of evil in the 21st century.
Therefore, on the matter as to why the Power hates Tucker Carlson so much, we-in-the-know must understand that it is Jewish Power that is the main source of hostility against him. Sure, there are plenty of non-Jews who hate Carlson but, having no minds or agency of their own, they are little more than barking dogs, hardly different from John McCain growling at Russia, Syria, Iran, and Libya at the behest of his Jewish masters.
So, why does the Power hate Carlson so much? Is it because Tucker Carlson has gone way too FAR RIGHT and is now beyond the pale? No. Ironically, Jewish fear has to do with Carlson turning LEFT-RIGHT, especially in class terms. In American discourse, libertarianism and ultra-capitalism are often labeled as 'far right'. Many people in the Dissident Right may disagree and argue that libertarian principles and 'free trade' ideology have little to do with true rightism or conservatism, BUT the current terminology, especially among leftist-progressives, insist that ultra-capitalists are greedy, cold-blooded, uncaring, heartless, and ruthless members of the Far Right. Another group that is often labeled 'far right' are social conservatives, the kind of people that Chris Hedges labels as 'Christo-Fascists'. Many on the so-called Left have long argued that the GOP is a den of far-right capitalists of greed and far-right moralists of intolerance. Given that 'far right' is often used to describe Neo-Nazis and the like, one might think Jews(who are mostly on the 'left') would shake with fright over far-right capitalists and far-right moralists because they are so purist in their ideologies or worldviews. One bunch of guys are all about the wallet, and the other bunch of guys are all about the Bible(to thump people with). You might think Jews would fear such groups less IF those groups became less 'rightist'(or fervent in their narrow obsessions) and took up some leftist ideas for balance and equilibrium. After all, such moderation would make them less 'far right' or even turn them left-right.
And yet, this is what the Jews fear most. Jews prefer that GOP remain 'far-right'-capitalist or 'far-right'-moralist because such purism has a fracturing effect on the goy populace. Besides, Jews can easily handle libertarians and hardline Christians. After all, despite most Jews being on the 'left', they are the richest and most talented capitalists in the world. So, libertarian pro-capitalism means more money and power for Jews. Whether Jews are on the 'left' or the 'right', they are the Apex Predators of globalist-capitalism, and so, libertarian economic policies are a great boon to them. But, GOP libertarianism is also useful in this regard: Even as Jews benefit the most from 'free trade' and 'free market' policies, they can posture as caring-and-compassionate 'progressives' who are pushing against the cold-blooded greed of men like Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan of the GOP. Jews, as top capitalists, gain most from 'free trade' but then, nominally as 'liberals' and 'progressives', pretend to be pushing against the heartless greed of the 'far-right' GOP. Furthermore, libertarians are such soulless toadies of power and privilege that they can easily be bought by Jewish Money.
As for hardcore Christians, Jews know that such an anti-intellectual and anti-rational bunch of folks won't gain much power and influence in academia and media; it's like Jews fear idiot Muslim fundamentalists less than modern secular Arabs who've mastered science and engineering to build nations that are somewhat comparable to Western ones. Jews may despise hardcore Christians but don't fear them. Also, because such Christians tend to be dupes for Israel-as-God's-country-and-closest-ally-of-America, they can easily be manipulated into expending most of their energies into praising Israel(and taking the blame as to why the US can't be fair to both sides in the Israel-Palestinian conflict).
Above all, Jews appreciate 'far-right' capitalists and 'far-right' moralists because they are incapable of creating a broad united front that might challenge the elites. 'Far-right' capitalists are all about MORE for Wall Street, Las Vegas, and Big Money. Even if most Americans love money, they will never be rich and will not warm up to pro-rich policies. Thus, 'far-right' capitalism has only made it nearly impossible to form a broad American coalition against the ruling elites. Guys like Rush Limbaugh appealed to the masses and talked like 'one of them', but his main message was 'free trade' and 'it is glorious to be rich'. Even as he railed against 'Chi-coms', he was full of praise for Walmart that could not have been possible without 'free trade' with 'Chi-coms'. So, even as he had many fans, more and more of them grew disgruntled with him as either an out-of-touch or one fat lousy heartless bastard. So, Limbaugh proved to be a huge bust as 'free trade' globalism continued to erode away at the Middle Class. He spoke of the 'fruited plains', but the New Order was more that of fruits-and-planes. In the 1990s, when Patrick Buchanan spoke up for the American working class, Limbaugh joined with the other 'free traders' in denouncing Buchanan as a 'populist' than a 'conservative'. (But, what was 'free trade' conserving by shipping tons of US industry to Mexico and China, and then by outsourcing even white-collar jobs to places like India?) One of the great ironies of American Politics is that Jews, who made most money as ruthless and greedy capitalists, got to play the role of caring-and-compassionate 'progressives' while much of White Middle America, increasingly struggling and demoralized, was sold, at least for a time, on the gospel of 'you can have it all' in the era of Communism-Defeated and Capitalism-Triumphant. Imagine the fox playing the role of defender of hens while hens dream of becoming foxes.
'Far-right' moralists were also useful to Jewish Power because their moralism(often simplistic and/or single-issue, such as abortion) made it difficult to create a broad coalition, at least not in the age of decadence and degeneracy brought upon mainly by Jewish Power. Things were different in earlier times when America used to be far more Christian and/or moralistic. Back then, huge numbers of white people could be brought together under the common tent of Jesus and Justice(that is real justice, not bullshit 'social justice' of today about how men with penises & testicles are 'women'). But it's difficult to unite people around moral issues in a decadent society where so many guys get their cues from rap music and so many girls prioritize orgasm over organism(which is why NY now allows abortion up to childbirth). Actually, things are now worse than merely decadent and degenerate because neo-satanism has persuaded so many idiot minds that decadence is the new sacredness, or 'sacradence'. Not only do most people neglect true morality but they wave the banner of degeneracy as the New Morality and demand inquisitions upon those who insist on remaining true to their moral and spiritual convictions. Notice how rabid & virulent The Outrage Mobs(or TOM), with minds infected with Jewish globo-homo filth, employed pseudo-moral hysteria and lawfare to destroy Christian bakers who refused to bake 'gay wedding cakes'. (And even as those bakers had their lives destroyed, there wasn't a pip of support from the supposedly conservative Republican Party whose main gesture is to look over the shoulder to see if the Jewish Master is displeased. As Jews spread the message far-and-wide that the 'gay agenda' is a go and will happen and must happen, the GOP just cucked like a bunch of pussies that they are.) Because Jewish influence degraded so much of society, it's nearly impossible to unite the people around moral issues. Paradoxically, precisely because Jews spread immorality and filth all around, they value the 'purism' of 'far right' moralists. Jews know that in a foul and filthy world(of New Normal morality where the highest value is penis inside a poopchute or penis-and-balls cut off to make for a fake vagina), the words of moralists will have limited appeal among the vast population made up of cynics, decadents, or New Normals(who can only get 'morally' worked up for lunacies like 'homomania' or 'pussy march'). There was once a time when a man like William Jennings Bryan could rouse up the masses; today, you're more likely to find people who get all 'godly' over the 'divinity' of Bruce 'Caitlyn' Jennings. Because of its limited appeal in an age when white boys grow up to rap thug music and white girls grow up 'twerking' in imitation of Miley Cyrus(and where college-educated women's idea of culture is SEX AND THE CITY and CAPTAIN MARVEL), Jews know that 'far-right' moralism will only serve to alienate the masses. Just as it was impossible for Abraham to appeal to the people of Sodom and Gomorrah, it's nearly impossible to reach out morally to most people in the Age of Degeneracy.
It also doesn't help that 'far right' moralists tend to be mentally-limited and culturally incurious Bible-thumpers who are more into holier-than-thou-ness than roll-up-the-sleeves good work backed by good words(just like most 'social justice warrior' types tend to be in it for virtue-vaping and virtue-vanity than for anything that resembles true justice). While most 'far-right' moralists are good people, Jew-run media have sought to portray them in the worst way possible, especially by providing favored coverage to groups like Westboro church that protested military funerals in opposition to the homo agenda. I suspect this 'church' has been a 'false fag' operation to create the impression that Christians who oppose the 'gay agenda' are unpatriotic. Indeed, few things are more offensive to the American Right than people harassing military funerals. By highlighting the Westboro church Jewish-controlled media created the impression that those who oppose the 'gay agenda' are also unpatriotic and hate the military.
Anyway, why all this hatred for Tucker Carlson? Is it really because he is so hopelessly far-right and extreme? Or, is it something else? Indeed, are Jews angry at Carlson precisely because he rejects both 'far-right' capitalism and 'far-right' moralism? After all, why did Jews hate Donald Trump so much in the 2016 campaign? Jews tried to paint him as 'far-right' or even 'literally Hitler', but weren't they angry with him precisely because he wasn't 'far-right' on economic and moral issues? As Kevin Michael Grace argued numerous times, "'conservatism' needs to die" because (1) moral issues are too divisive in our degenerate age and (2) Republicans mouth moralistic platitudes but, as essentially 'paycheck conservatives', do NOT intend to take up the fight because their main priority is to stay inside the Beltway.
Furthermore, economic issues of 'small government' and 'lower taxes'(often demeaned as 'far right') have lost their luster as the US(and rest of the West) went from National Capitalism to Global Capitalism. In a National Economy, one could argue that the middle class and small businessmen have something to gain from less regulation and lower taxes. And if bigger government meant more welfare for bums, limited government might appeal to the working class as well, which is why many blue-collar folks voted for Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan. Also, during the Cold War, even most of the American Working Class stood with capitalism against communism, which is one reason why the American Left eventually lost interest in the 'reactionary' and patriotic Archie-Bunkerite white working class.
Anyway, that was then, this is now. Cold War is long over though there is its shadow in the so-called 'new cold war' concocted by Jews who hate Vladimir Putin for having said NO to Globo-Homomania. And contrary to Neo-Liberal economists who argued for capitalism and market dynamics, it turned out that Big Capital in Wall Street, High Tech, Big Media, and Big Pharma closely colludes with the Deep State to own and control just about everything. Consider the Wall Street bailouts for banks that were 'too big to fail'. Contrary to the libertarian notion of capitalism = liberty versus big government = tyranny, the result has been a Convergence of Big Money and Big State, with the main glue being the 'chatechisms'(or secular catechisms of the chattering classes) of Jew-Worship, Afro-celebration, and Homo-fanfare(and babytalk about 'diversity', 'inclusion', and 'hate'). Today, we have Amazon, Google, Facebook, and Big Banks working with Big State to censor dissidents, especially of the White Liberationist and BDS movements.
But then, it was the Great Betrayal that led to the Great Awakening. Many ordinary conservatives were told that they must support capitalism against Big State to have liberty, but they found out that Big Capital is only too happy to work with Big State to deny platforms and financial services to people based on race, creed, and ideology. The silver lining of this betrayal is that scales began to fall from the eyes of Americans(mostly on the Right but also on the Left, especially those who champion the Palestinian cause) who came to realize that monopoly-crony-capitalism of the globalist era is not pro-freedom and protective of individual liberty. Indeed, for thinking people who know how to decode Globalese, the official terminology of PC and Zionist-US hegemonism is mostly smoke-and-mirrors.
Just consider the following globalist terms decoded by the trutherizer:
Liberal Democracy: It really means Tribal Oligarchy. If the US is really about spreading 'liberal democracy', why is it so blindly supportive of Zionist imperialism and the Occupation of West Bank? Why is the US so cozy with Saudi Arabia while so hostile to Syria, a secular Arab nation that has Westernized in many walks of life?
Diversity: It is really Division or divide-and-rule. Jews promote Diversity in goy nations to pit goy against goy, thus creating cracks through which Jewish Power can drive its wedges. When Jews say 'Diversity is our strength', they really mean 'divide-and-rule over diverse goyim means more power to us Jews.
Inclusion: It's really a euphemism for invasion. How can any community, order, or society survive without borders and exclusion? If Israel opened its borders and welcomed any number of peoples in the spirit of 'inclusion', it would be wiped off the map in no time as plenty of poorer folks from Africa and Middle East will come to partake of greater wealth in Israel. Also, 'inclusion' is used as mind-trick by elite institutions that have no real intention of being truly inclusive. Take Ivy League universities. If they really want to be 'inclusive', they should go for open admissions and include anyone on the basis of lottery. Of course, open admissions would destroy their academic reputations, and so, these institutions mouth platitudes about 'inclusion' and let in token numbers of 'diversity' via 'affirmative action programs' to create the impression that they are open to all.
Hate Speech: Rabidly and virulently hateful Jews who look upon goyim as cattle simply cannot tolerate speech that is critical of Jewish Power. Jews love to be radical and critical toward others, but they simply cannot take counter-criticism and push-back. So, Jews will use 'critical theory' against their enemies but will not abide by counter-critical theory that throws it back at Jews. Jews can dish it out but they can't take it. When people judge Jews by the same criteria that Jews use to judge others, Jews get all sourpuss and kvetch about 'hate speech' and 'antisemitism'. Jews have the personality of the Jewish God, the perfect Being who judges mankind but forbids mankind to judge Him. So, when Jews say 'hate speech', they really mean 'blasphemy' and 'burn the heretic that dares to challenge our power'. Indeed, this is why Jews got SPLC and ADL to pressure Amazon.com to ban THE CULTURE OF CRITIQUE by Kevin Macdonald. For Jews, 'critical theory' is a One-Way street. They can drive down the street to run us down, but we better not drive down the other way to run them down.
Far Right: Jews keep changing the goal-posts on this. Notice that current Israel is more 'far right' than any European nation(even any of the Visegrad nations), but the Jew-run media just refer to Israel as 'right-wing'(when not praising it as the 'only liberal democracy in the Middle East) whereas white nations that only to preserve their peoples and cultures are smeared as 'far right'.
If there's going to be Convergence at the Top, there might as well be Convergence at the bottom. The Convergence at the top is called Globalist Neo-Liberal Consensus, and it was mostly completed from the Clinton Era to Obama Era. The basic idea was to synthesize the GOP 'free trade' & de-regulatory supply-side economics AND Democratic Party's Globo-Homomania narcissism as the 'new progressivism'. The so-called 'right' would have to dump Social Conservatism and the so-called 'left' would have to shed Big Labor & class politics. In economic policy the GOP line since the Reagan Era would prevail, and in social policy the Democratic line would take the lead, e.g. on stuff like 'gay marriage', the Democrats would all be obligated to push it through whereas Republicans would all be obligated to just shut up and not oppose it. And as Big Media and Hollywood use the J-Ray(Jewish Ray) to sway the masses, there was no need for the GOP to worry about a massive moral backlash from the base. As even most Republicans are hooked to Pop Culture as their main culture, they were bound to come around to bending over to Homomania as well(as if one of the hallmark signs of virtue is to flash one's adoration of 'gayness', along with for Jewishness and blackness). In a way, one could argue that both the 'conservative' and the 'liberal' elites betrayed their base by, respectively, ditching social conservatives and class politics. But then, some of the pressures for betrayal came from the masses themselves as the majority of Americans had grown corrupted and gross from influence of mass education and mass media. Most lower-class 'conservatives' became vulgar morons whose culture consisted of watching THE JERRY SPRINGER SHOW and getting tattoos. Also, the rise of mall-churches turned Christianity into something like a Rock concert or personality cult. Such debased conservatives who took their social cues from Jewish-run Hollywood and TV came around to rapping, interracism, tattoos, and even Homomania. Being dumb, these 'conservatives' were incapable of thinking for themselves and relied on the terminology cooked up by PC globalists. So, EVEN IF Conservative elites had tried to defend True Marriage, there wouldn't have been much support from the base, and if anything, there might have been considerable pushback as sick and degenerate US is a nation where 80% now support 'gay marriage'. As for the 'liberal' base, their main passions consisted of various 'identity politics', Homomania, vanity displays(like slut pride), or irrational worship of Magic Negro. Even their economic issues were more about politics of theater or 'entitlementality' than true social justice. Workers in the past struggled for just pay and benefits for their labor. In contrast, the theme of OCCUPY WALL STREET was, "the banks are getting free money, so give us free shit too." Just like it is now difficult for a social conservative leader to appeal to the 'conservative' masses, it's difficult for a true economic leftist to appeal to the 'liberal' masses. Most people have been corrupted, from top to bottom, and much of what passes for morality is playing with shopworn symbolism than dealing with reality.
Jewish Supremacy, the dominant power in the US(and the world) loved this Elite Convergence because it severed the Democratic elites from their base and severed the Republican elites from their base. As the Democratic Party became the hothouse of 'identity politics', unity was impossible among the various groups, and the Democratic goy elites mainly focused on serving Jews and homos at the top. Not only do Jews hold the purse strings, but it's easier to serve one lord at the top than the contending mobs below. One might have expected more unity in the GOP, still mainly the white and Christian party, but even many of the 'conservative' base had fractured along variations of soulless libertarianism and mindless Evangelicalism. As a 'family values' party whose biggest donor was Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson(and in a world where 'conservative' spiritual values are represented by a flaky and/or scandalous Catholic Church, Mammon-worshiping Cult-Christianity of Mormonism, and brain-dead 'zombitry' of Christian Zionism), it was difficult to ascertain what American Conservatism stood for. Naturally, GOP goy elites, just like their counterparts in the Democratic Party, found it much easier, not to mention more profitable, to serve the single master of Jewish Supremacism than bother with the various confused factions of social conservatism, fundamental religion, and puritanical libertarianism. With both Democratic goy elites and GOP goy elites effectively severed from their own bases, Jews(and their homo partners) think they have it all: The combination right in their hands. And Jews want to keep it that way.
But what if there is another kind of Convergence? If the upper 'left' and upper 'right' converged(as Michael Lind warned in The Next American Nation: The New Nationalism and the Fourth American Revolution) by neglecting their own bases(thereby turning American Politics into a game of 'winners' and 'losers'), what if the neglected Democratic base and neglected GOP base began to converge into a kind of left-right populism. Though people like Pat Buchanan have been much mentioned as heralds of resurgence of populism, Michael Lind had also sounded the alarm and offered counter-proposals with books like The Radical Center: The Future of American Politics.
Now, mass-convergence is far more difficult to pull off than elite-convergence. Elites tend to be concentrated in key institutions and industries in a handful of big cities, college towns, and government. Most of the elites in the US are to be found in Ivy League schools and places like Wall Street, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, and top law firms. Though there is growing diversity among the elites, shared privilege is a great glue and, besides, there is the Jew-glue that bonds all the elites together. If there weren't a dominant elite group in the US, there might be more conflict at the top, like in THE GODFATHER when the Five Families figured that the Corleones are slipping in power and make their move. It was when the Corleone family reasserted their dominance at the end of the movie that the other crime families got back in line.
Jewish Dominance is like the Corleones of American Power. It is The Power around which the lesser elite-powers revolve. It is telling that the Golden Age of American Liberty and Freedom was from the 1960s to the 1980s when elite power was shifting from Wasps to Jews. Not only were Wasps losing grip on society but Jews had to champion maximum freedom in order to subvert the existing power structure. It was after Jews gained dominance that they suddenly began to roll back on liberties lest other groups challenge Jewish Power as the Jews had once challenged Wasp power. Because there is a dominant elite in the US, all the lesser elites are agreed that they must kiss the Jewish Hand to be accepted into the Power Club.
In contrast, no such well-understood norm or gravitational center exists among the masses. Not only are masses separated by vast differences -- what do oil workers in South Dakota have in common with hillbillies in West Virginia, Negroes in Georgia, or Mexicans in EL Paso? -- , but there is no common set of rites and rules that can pull them into a unity, all the more so because the US has grown racially, culturally, and socially more diverse and divided than ever. Also, if privilege at the top tends to pull together the affluent and connected, relative poverty tends to divide people at the bottom into warring factions, especially if they are diverse and without leadership(not least because the goy elites of both parties mostly neglect their own bases and spend most of their time sucking up to Jews).
That said, great numbers of people can be brought together in times of great crisis. It happened in both the US and Germany in the 1930s as the result of the Great Depression. But then, it was possible because both the US and Germany were largely white, gentile, and Christian. Germany was brazenly anti-Jewish, and even though FDR loathed National Socialism, he wasn't all too keen on Jewish power even though there were certain powerful Jewish figures in his administration. Back then, Wasps were solidly in command and control, and Jews had to think twice about pushing their tribal agenda too powerfully(which they were able to do more effectively through the presidency of the lackluster and clueless Harry S. Truman). Anyway, things got so bad that a sufficiently broad swath of Americans were able to unite from north to south and east to west to keep FDR in power for 12 yrs as the People's President. And even though the National Socialists came to power with only third of the vote in Germany, their successes in the years prior to the tragic World War II led to support from the overwhelming majority of Germans(and Austrians who clamored for unity with Germany). Even though the New Deal is remembered as 'leftist'(or even 'far left' by some) and National Socialism is remembered as 'far right', both were actually a kind of unity of left and right. The New Deal era, as recounted by chunkhead Ross Douthat, was remarkably socially conservative, a hangover and backlash from the wildly decadent excesses of the speculative 1920s that came to be known as the 'Jazz Age'. FDR used his quasi-socialist policies to shore up the American Family. Socialist novelist John Steinbeck wrote of strong families and need for moral fiber and mutual support.
As for National Socialism, it won over many of the German middle and working classes because it didn't only stress national unity and social values(which were pretty solid except for the pathologically radical notions about race and Aryan supremacism) but provided massive work programs and universal healthcare. Such unity of leftist and rightist themes & policies were possible because both Germany and the US were ruled by white gentiles and were overwhelmingly either German or white-American in demographics.
According to Jewish Historiography of the 20th century, FDR was a godlike savior of the free world whereas Hitler was the most evil 'far right' vermin that ever lived. But, such view was an accident of history, at least to an extent. Would Jews have been so reverent of FDR if not for his role in the war against Nazi Germany? Keep in mind that, for a few decades following World War II, many Jews were equally reverent toward Stalin as the great vanquisher of Hitler's empire. But over time, Jews came to loathe Stalin and Soviet Union as anathema to True Jewish potential and interests. And even though it took longer, Jews now feel the same way about FDR and the New Deal, which is why they are eager to use a turd-boy like Tahenisi Coates to smear FDR as a 'racist'. (LOL. What past politician, by today's standards, was not a 'racist'?) Back then, Jews saw FDR as enemy of Hitler and counterbalance against the American Right that was even more suspicious of Jewish power than the American Left was. But, once Jews gained supreme power in the US, they felt less love for FDR and the New Deal, which was essentially about unity of white gentile elites and white gentile masses; it was left-nationalism. (There were gains for blacks in the New Deal, but the main priority was about white elites making things a bit easier for the troubled white masses.) Jews hate this idea because Jewish supremacist power depends on white elites serving Jewish super-elites than connecting with the white masses. To prevent white elite and white mass unity, Jews exploit the issue of 'racism' and 'white supremacism', which now means privileged whites showing ANY concern for white people(such as whites in South Africa being raped and slaughtered by feral blacks). Of course, it won't look good for Jewish super-elites to say, "You white elites must ignore your own people and instead serve us Jewish overlords." Jewish supremacism would be bared and exposed. So, what moral cover do Jews use to perpetuate their supremacism? Jews invoke Diversity and argue that white elites should represent and serve EVERYONE of ALL COLORS than favor their own race. But it's all just a con-game because it is IMPOSSIBLE for white elites to represent so many different groups with conflicting interests. So, what is the only game that is left for the white elites? Serving Jewish interests at the top. It's a dirty but brilliant bait-and-switch con-trick. Jews shame white elites about 'white supremacism'(which can mean the slightest white sympathy for other whites) and pressure them toward serving Diversity, but as Diversity is impossible to serve or govern, white elites just end up serving Jewish Power. Indeed, if Jews are really all about Diversity and serving ALL groups equally, why did they use their muscle to criminalize BDS, silence Palestinian-American voices, and condemn Ilhan Omar for her criticism of Zionist supremacism that led to Wars for Israel and oppression of Muslims? Jews tell white elites to bypass the white masses and toss the ball at Diversity, but the chaotic hands of Diversity always lose the ball that just bounce off them and land on the Jews. Diversity is just Jewish smoke-and-mirrors trick or deflective tool to make white elites serve Jews than white people.
Then, it should be clear why Jews hate Tucker Carlson with such virulence. Even though Carlson is savvy enough to not name the Jew(as such is career suicide in US media and politics, especially for whites), his message, far from being 'far right' in capitalist or moralist terms, strives for a synthesis of rightism and leftism, of a new unity between the Beltway elites and the masses. It is that kind of unity that Jews fear most. Jews had no reason to fear the 'far-right' capitalism of Paul Ryans of the world as (1) capitalism is a boon to Jewish wealth and power and (2) politics of wealth, especially in the age of globalism, tend to alienate too many people. As for 'far right' moralism, we know it tends to alienate too many Americans who are addicted to hedonism, drugs, and abortion. One of the problems of Patrick Buchanan was his stridently moralistic Catholic conservatism, which just rubbed too many Americans the wrong way as 'taking my rights away to indulge in fun'. In contrast, Trump who mostly ignored moral issues and ran on protecting the American Worker miraculously managed to arrive at a populist formula that led him to the Presidency. (Even though Trump won by razor-thin margins, he probably would have won much bigger IF the media had been fair to both candidates. What Jews feared most about Trumpism wasn't its purported 'far-rightism' but the fusion of leftism and rightism, as when Trump denounced neo-imperialist wars and spoke in defense of Middle America, promises that turned out to be rather hollow for various reasons.)
Now, can Tucker Carlson goad the elites to care about Traditional White America? Jews claim to care about Diversity, but if we judge them by what they do than what they say, everything they've been doing for the past 40 years has been little more than serving the agenda of "Is it great for Jews?" Black underclass has gotten worse, and browns from Latin America are mired in menial jobs. White middle class is just barely holding on, and the white working class is in dire straits. Only the elites and the upper-middle class of the New Economy are doing fabulous or well. Contrary to Jewish claims(what they say), Jews use their power in the US to make America serve Jewish supremacist interests both here and abroad. Just ask the Palestinians. Even though Jews are on the 'left', they despite most gentile progs for being so dumb. How can Jews respect any people who so easily fell for Russia Collusion Hoax(that no Jew privately believes in) and Homomania(which Jews privately know to be a proxy cultural weapon of Jewish globalist hegemonism)? Jews use the easily 'triggered' dumb goy progs as barking dogs and little else. If anything, while moronic and insipid Outrage Mob types dye their hair green and growl at 'white supremacists', Jews continue to amass more fortune and gain more trophies to shore up Jewish supremacism. (Alt Right had a chance as a White Liberationist movement opposed to Jewish Supremacism, but instead, Richard Spencer got together with a bunch of 14/88 types and turned the movement into neo-white-supremacism. Instead of stressing the moral urgency of white emancipation from Jewish supremacism, the message was "We want to replace Jewish supremacism with white supremacism and conquer the whole world again." Talk about dumb.)
Anyway, Tucker Carlson's ideas are, as yet, confused and inchoate. He senses something profoundly wrong with the current system and the need for new political alignments & configurations as the old dichotomies of 'left' and 'right' no longer make any sense. He stares into the crystal ball and sees all sorts of signs of danger, but he isn't sure what must be done, what can be done and how. Indeed, American Politics is like Macbeth meeting for the first time the witches who offer prophecies laden with traps. Is Traditional America hopeless and lost forever, what with white elites having been reduced to cucks of Jewish/Homo elites and with white masses having been relegated to cuck-status vis-a-vis blacks, 'white guilt', and Diversity? Was Trumpism the last hurrah of White America before its inevitable demise into just another 'minority' group?
Or, is there something portentous in the election of Muslims to US Congress, a perverse but real sign of hope? While White American Conservatives, with neo-crusader instincts, feel closer to Jews and Israel than to Muslims, might there be an awakening among white Americans of all stripes that JEWISH SUPREMACISM is the main enemy of ALL humanity? Many on the Dissident Right are well-aware that Jewish power uses white Christians to smash Muslim nations and then uses Muslim 'refugees' against the white world. Also, there is grumbling among many Trump supporters who notice that Trump hasn't done much for White America but has gone to hell and back for Israel and Jews, incredibly the very people who've heaped most abuse on him. When white people see Trump surrounded by Jews and doing the bidding of the very people who did most to insult and abuse him, they don't see a proud national leader but a cucky-wuck. It seems unlikely at the moment, but if White America is lost forever as a majority power, could it be that white Americans can ally with Diversity against Jewish supremacist power and white cuck-elites who betrayed the white masses to get their thirty pieces of silver?
Commentary on "Happy Homelands - Partisan Girl"(on Ramzpaul Show): Anglos, Maoris, and Muslims in New Zealand
On the matter of New Zealand, I have to disagree with Partisan Girl(at around 1:16:00) of the Video Above.
It's true Maoris were there first and have ancestral connection to the land, something which whites don't have(at least not deeply). But New Zealand as a nation, economy, and system is entirely the creation of whites, namely Anglos. Without Anglo conquest and colonization of that territory, there would be no New Zealand, period. Whites created the modern nation of New Zealand, which many consider a kind of affluent and well-managed paradise.
So, I would argue TWO peoples have a right to New Zealand(aka Maori-land). Maoris because they'd been there for many thousands of years and have deep roots. And whites because they arrived and built a new social and economic system from scratch. Maoris have a link with the soil and plants; whites have a direct connection to all the cities and institutions that they built in what came to be known as New Zealand.
Then, if whites in New Zealand historically owe something to another people, it is to Maoris and TO MAORIS ONLY as New Zealand was taken from Maoris and from no one else. As whites didn't take New Zealand from Muslims or Arabs, Muslims and/or Arabs have NO CLAIM to New Zealand, which they didn't build and to which they lack ancestral claim of blood and soil.
That said, if the good people of Australia and New Zealand really sympathize with suffering Muslims and Arabs in the Middle East and North Africa, why don't they grow some a pair and condemn the Jewish-controlled US for waging all these Wars for Israel that have wrecked so much of the Middle East as the result of bombs, support to radical Jihadis(mostly by US and Saudis), and economic sanctions(that have devastated entire nations)?
But elites and progs in Aussies and Zealanders are totally shhhhhh about that truth and just express their sympathy by taking in Arab refugees(even though they themselves weren't the ones who pushed these insane wars). It seems Jews tribalize/privatize the gains and universalize/socialize the costs/losses in these Wars for Israel. Weakened and wrecked Muslim nations are good for Israeli dominance, so Jews tribalize the gains. But these wars led to all these refugees, so Jews universalize the costs/losses by burdening OTHER nations to take in refugees(while Israel takes in none and, if anything, keeps taking more of West Bank and are poised to annex Golan Heights).
Anyway, if the 'compassionate' elites of Australia and New Zealand are so concerned about the plight of Arabs and Muslims, why don't they condemn the SOURCE of the problem that led to the Refugee Problem in the first place? You know, the damn Wars for Israel. But it seems most elites in Australia and New Zealand are either too afraid, brainwashed, and/or bought-and-sold by the Zionist globo-homo Power to speak the simple truth. So, their idea of sympathy is cleaning up the mess made by the Jews while never mentioning Jewish power as culprit.
Imagine if, during World War II, Australia and New Zealand took in Polish and Greek refugees without ever mentioning the fact that Nazi Invaders are the cause of the refugee problem. Worse, imagine if Australia and New Zealand, even as they took in Polish and Greek refugees, praised and flattered Nazi Germany 24/7.
Well, such is the state of the world today. Jewish-run US is the source of most major conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa. These are Wars for Israel instigated by Judeo-Nazis, but the cuck-elites of New Zealand and Australia are always full of praise for Zionism and US foreign policy. They don't dare to name the real culprits of the Middle East Wars. Their feeble idea of 'good work' is cleaning the mess made by another without ever naming and blaming that other.
Friday, March 15, 2019
Alas, it also has a darker side: imperialism, racism, genocide, slavery, religious and political persecutions and, of course, two world wars.
Hardly different from rest of humanity.
By the way, race + ism should be defined as belief in reality of race and racial differences. ISM means belief, after all. Using 'racism' to mean 'mindless or groundless racial hatred of supremacism' is to fall into the trap of the enemy. Everyone is race-ist, explicitly or implicitly, because it's impossible not to notice racial differences.
But what the so-called “collective West” (aka the AngloZionist Empire) is showing today is the exact opposite of what the West is supposed to stand for. Here are just a few examples
When has the West, or any civilization, ever practiced what it preached?
I will grant that the hypocrisy is louder than ever under globo-homo Zionist control, but it's a matter of degree than substance.
International law: with the US/NATO aggression against the Serbian nation, a major feature of western civilization died: international law.
True to an extent. Serbia was targeted because it was the strongest state in Yugoslavia and because it was closest to Russia. Also, Jewish power, by coming to the 'rescue' of Muslim Albanians, wanted to propagandize itself as 'pro-Muslim' so as to prepare for wars against Muslim nations. Nice shtick: "Gee, how can WE AMERICANS be anti-Muslim when WE bailed out the Albanian Muslims?" Of course, Jews were being rank hypocrites. Jewish logic says the West had to help Jews take back the Holy Land BUT Serbians had no right to take back their ancient homeland from Albanians who'd come invading under Ottoman rule.
That said, US/NATO intervention in Serbia was a mixed bag. For most of the 90s, NATO had done little or nothing to stop the slaughter, just like the UN did nothing to stop the Rwandan genocide. There was a sense that SOMETHING had to be done to end the bloodshed and cycles of violence.
In retrospect, it was handled badly, but INTERNATIONAL LAW means that nations around the world must work together to stop excessive mayhem in a part of the world. In a more perfect world with a better superpower than the US, maybe something good have come of it. But the US had no credibility as it had used sanctions to kill 100,000s of kids in Iraq.
Law of War and Geneva Conventions: same here, the US is gleefully ignoring many of the most sacred provisions of the laws of war and the Geneva Conventions
What of massive civilian bombings in WWII, Korean War, Vietnam War, and etc. US support of right-wing death squads during the Cold War. 100,000s, possibly millions, slaughtered in Latin America.
It was always like this. Soviets backed their own bloody regimes in Asia and Latin America. Chinese backed the loathsome Khmer Rouge. The world didn't suddenly suck just now. It was always a mess.
Respect for alliances and partnerships. The AngloZionist Empire has no allies – only vassal states, puppet regimes and comprador 5th columnists.
One of the benefits of being an empire. Puppets are more reliable than allies. Allies can break off he alliance. Puppets always do as told. In that sense, we can't blame the US for preferring puppets to allies. Better off owning a trained dog than partnering with a lone wolf with a streak of independence.
When the Neocons finally came out and showed their true face, they did more than just affect the image of the US abroad, they also gave a signal to their colonial administrators that all pretense of decency could now be dropped.
Jewish tribal supremacist takeover of US empire has been most unfortunate. Though both the US and USSR got their hands dirty and bloody in the Cold War(and supported murderous proxies), there really was a clash of big ideas and visions relevant to much, even the majority, of humanity. It was a world conflict for world-ideas. Big power engaged in big action for big isms.
But, we now have the US as lone hegemon using its immense power and influence to serve the narrow interests of a single tribe(allied mainly with homo supremacists). There is so much tensions around the world to indulge the Jews, a tiny percentage of world population, and homos(the cherry-picked allies of Jews): Jewish King and Homo Queen. Since Jews know that it's too much to ask all the world to risk WWIII, IV, V, and etc. for Jewish interests, they couch their chosen conflicts in terms of 'human rights' and 'spreading democracy' and etc, but it rings so hollow. Or Jews try to spin the conflicts as holy crusades to spread homomania, which actually goes over well with many people in the West for whom queertianity is their new missionary-fairy faith.
Many Russians living in the West (such as Dmitri Orlov) have noted the numerous similarities between the late Soviet Union (especially the so-called “stagnation years”) and the modern US . I myself made such a list of similarities as far back as 2014 when I listed the following:
A bloated military budget resulting in an ineffective military
I dunno. US seems to be pretty effective in smashing nations. Just ask the Libyans, Iraqis, and Syrians. Maybe US sucks at nation-building, but it is an expert at nation-wrecking.
A huge and ineffective intelligence community
Ineffective? It seems very effective. US was able to mess up computer systems in Iran. It has hidden devices in computers all over the world. Also, Intelligence works closely with Jews and Israel, which means all the political dirt are known to Jews who can blackmail anyone.
A crumbling public infrastructure
Depends on where you look. Certain big cities are richer than ever. And even now, most roads in the US are better than roads in Russia or China.
A world record in the per-capita ratio of incarcerated people (US GULag)
Blacks. Evolution made them meaner and tougher. Have blacks, will have lots of inmates.
A propaganda machine which nobody trusts any more
I wish this were so, but plenty of morons trust every word of snakes like Rachel Maddow and S.E. Cupp. And all that anti-Russia hate news must have worked because the great majority of Americans now hate and fear Russia more than ever.
An internal dissident movement which the regime tries to keep silent
True of any society.
An industry whose main exports are weapons and energy
Isn't that Russia NOW? In contrast, the US is also a huge exporter of high-tech, medicine, media, entertainment, chemicals, foods, and etc.
A population fearful of being spied on by the internal security services
Sadly, most Americans have learned to stopped worrying and love the spying. There was some fuss from progs about the Patriot Act during the Bush II presidency, but when Edward Snowden spilled the beans, the entire elite and proggy class denounced him. Conservatism Inc, the arm of the war state, didn't defend him either. It took mavericks like Glenn Greenwald and Oliver Stone to come to his defense. Progs claim to stand for ideology, but 'idology'(idolatry as replacement for ideology) is bigger among them. One of their main 'idological' obsessions is the Magic Negro. As Obama was a Magic Negro, progs just venerated him as a 'historic president' and turned a blind eye to all his warmongering. Progs are more 'Catholicist' than 'Protestantist'. They are more dazzled by 'idolic' symbols and spectacles than true to the letter of progressive ideology.
A financially catastrophic over-reach of the empire across the planet
US is financially over-stretched, but I don't think its overseas empire is the main problem. It's bankers privatizing profits and socializing losses, and it's the masses hooked to entitlements.
An awareness that the entire planet hates you
Nothing new here, but there was always love/hate between US and the world. After all, the world still wants to come to the US and become Americans. Few Americans want to move to Russia, but plenty of Russians want to come to US and become Americans. Even Muslims whose nations have been blown up by the US want to come to US and become Americans into rap and burgers.
A young generation which believes in nothing at all
That wouldn't be so bad. It would at least mean that young people are skeptical. But in fact, too many young people truly and really really believe in globo-homo, Afromania, and Jew-Worship, or the Holy Three. Young people worship MLK, Diversity, Inclusion, 'gay' rainbow, and etc.
In this, they are different from latter-day Soviet youth who really were jaded and felt that they were being lied to about the richer and more advanced West.
In a way, the sheer superficiality of current Western ideology and 'idology' makes them more effective. One problem with Marxism-Leninism was that it just seemed boring, dull, worn, same-old-same-old, and tiresome as the years went by... like someone reading Church dogma for the umpteenth time. In contrast, even as current Western ideology and 'idology' are pretty idiotic, they are always changing color and shedding (snake) skin according to fads and fashion. The conceit of novelty, newness, and 'change' keeps young idiots excited and thrilled: 'gay pride', 'slut pride', BLM, Pussy March, MeToo, tranny-mania, Green New Deal, climate change, 'migrants welcome', 'microaggressions', etc. It's 31 flavors ideology/idology. In contrast, Soviets had only one flavor: Red. Most young people are idiots and care more for pizzazz than meaning. As idiotic as the current Western ideology/idology is, it knows how to hook people to a 'vibrant' sense of 'celebration' and 'happening'. The Revolution has been Advertised. This is why so many youths are indeed 'passionate'(or childishly excited) about whatever flavor they're obsessed with at the Moment.
An educational system in free-fall, (the Soviet one was much better, btw)
Many schools are a mess because of blacks and maybe some browns. And of course, lower-income whites do poorly. But US education is pretty solid for Jews, Asians, and white middle class. If we compare US whites with whites in Europe and Russia, they usually come off better.
A massive and prevailing amount of corruption on all levels of power
This is problematic, mainly due to blacks and Latin Americans/Muslims/Asians who bring their norms to the US. Also, diversity increases distrust.
Anyway... one big difference between US and old USSR is this: The MAIN reason why USSR collapsed was not due to all those problems listed above. It was because its elites got tired of managing the system and taking care of the 'lazy' masses. They wanted to end communism and become super-rich oligarchs. And THAT is why the system collapsed. It was blown up from the top.
In the US, the top elites are super-rich oligarchs. Why would they collapse the system when they already have it so good? During the days of USSR, the Soviet elites envied the capitalist elites of the West who were richer, freer, and had more stuff. The only way they could have it all was by ending communism, which was destroyed from the top than from the bottom.
The elites have it better than ever in the West. Why would they do anything to end the system? Trump made noise about draining the swamp, but it looks like he's been totally co-opted by now. Trump is Scump, saying nasty shit about Queen Ann(Coulter).
Also, as problematic as diversity is, it is actually to the advantage of the elites(esp minority Jewish elites) because diversity makes it impossible for the various racial/ethnic folks to unite to challenge elite power. Also, as at least 50% of whites are totally for diversity & homomania and see 'white supremacy' as the biggest threat, they work with Diversity and globo-homo elites to suppress any effective white mass challenge to elite power.
Monday, March 11, 2019
We Live in a Most Extraordinary Time of Satanic Prophecy Come True — Ari Aster’s HEREDITARY and Its Vision of Paimonic Prophecy — Prosperity Prophecy
Because our daily lives are mainly concerned with mundane matters in a world that seems relatively stable and prosperous — even poor people are not starving in the West and have basic amenities — , most of us lack awareness of what an extraordinary period in history we are a part of. It is both curse and blessing as our time is both epochal and satanic. As I’m a non-believer, what I mean by ‘satanic’ isn't necessarily spiritual or fantastical. Rather, there is something deeply diseased about the world despite all the advances in science, medicine, and technology. Being at the cusp of bio-genetic revolution, we have no way of knowing what humanity of the future may be like. But given the cancerous spirit of our times, those with the power to shape science and technology may do so for all the wrong reasons. At any rate, it is incredible that most people haven’t a clue as to why the current world-and-time is so extraordinary, amazing, and awesome. Part of the reason is, as stated earlier, most people fail to see the big picture because they are fixated on personal things. They care mostly about their jobs, family, and friends. Or, they are distracted by leisure and entertainment, especially as there’s plenty of those for people who don’t want to face reality. But, it’s also because people fail to see the significance of the period they are a part of unless it is over and can be reappraised with greater perspective. It’s like a hiker hasn’t a true sense of the distance he’s covering until he reaches a hilltop to survey the vast areas he’d traversed. A fuller significance of one’s experiences is appreciated only in retrospect. People during the Renaissance had no idea that they were living through a momentous epoch. History often happens like a dream in which strange and remarkable things happen but without the dreamer knowing he is in a dream. It is only upon waking and recollecting that he realizes what a remarkable dream-world he was in. Granted, there are exceptions, especially wars and revolutions. During such calamitous times, everyone is aware of the fact that History is happening in a big way. No one who lived in Paris during the French Revolution or in Poland during World War II could not have known of the gravity of what was going on. And since the rise of mass electronic media and their propensity for hype and sensationalism, people are inundated with impressions of micro-revolutions happening at all times. In a world where fashion and advertising mold our consciousness, we have a tendency to see politics and society as endlessly malleable and marketable. Then, it is hardly surprising that the Powers-that-be can so easily persuade the masses(like with shampoo commercials), from high to low, that 'cool' revolutions are happening all over. And indeed, when we remember all the gushy hypes about the New Economy, War on Terror, ‘Gay Pride’, BLM(Black Lives Matter), Slut Pride, Tea Party, Occupy Wall Street, Trans-gender movement, MAGA, and etc., it really does seem like there are lots of things happening all around. But, were most of them real revolutions or mostly fads... like the hippie and disco ‘movements’? In the end, it is the Ultimate Power that decides, and most pseudo-revolutions make some splash before receding into oblivion. Therefore, in order to understand the Real Revolution of our time, we need to ask, "Who now has the power?" The real power, that is. Or the power behind the power. The Power that can bolster or shut down the lesser powers. The power with its hand on the faucet to turn on-or-off the flow of history. Think of Hollywood with its ‘powerful’ stars and celebrities. They seem to define and dominate Hollywood, but in fact, they can be destroyed just as easily as they were made. And there are so many way to unmake them: Blacklisting, spreading rumors(real or false) & allegations, lawfare, and etc. Now, who constitute the real Power in Hollywood?
So, as remarkable as the many micro-revolutions may be, most of them did not make themselves or, at the very least, they couldn’t have come to fruition on their own. There had to be the Real Power behind them. Just like angels are nothing with God, these micro-revolutions are nothing without the Real Power. Consider BLM that seemed to be a real movement with unstoppable momentum. But in fact, Jewish media only hyped it in the hope of stirring up black rage in the 2016 election(and also to divert black rage at places like Baltimore and Ferguson away from New York and Chicago). It was also a bone tossed to blacks who felt mostly ignored by the Obama Presidency that mainly focused on Wall Street bailouts, Gentrification, Homomania, and Wars for Israel. But when BLM didn’t pan out as hoped, the Real Power abruptly de-funded it and ended the favorable media coverage, effectively shutting it down immediately. And the Real Power even went so far as to spread the rumor that BLM craziness had been instigated by the Kremlin. So, even though the ‘gay’ stuff, tranny stuff, BLM stuff, and Slut Pride stuff may all seem like the New Empowerments, their ebbs & flows and rises & falls have largely depended on the whims of the Real Power.
And it is by naming and understanding this Real Power that we can fully appreciate(as well as dread) the sheer extraordinariness of our times. We are living in the Age of Prophetic Fulfillment. In many ways, what had been promised to the Jews by God has come true. Jews have inherited the world. Given the astonishing aspect of this phenomenon, why don’t people know about it? Shouldn't we all be talking about it? We are living in the Age when the People of the Book have come to control the world, and yet, the governing principle is, "Don’t you dare talk about Jewish Power." For this reason, what has come to be can be called a Silent Revolution, Silent Prophecy, Silent Hegemony, Silent Supremacy. Or Esoteric Revolution or Esoteric Prophecy(or Eso-Revolution or Eso-Prophecy). Why the silence? Don’t Jews want to show their pride in their great power(like homos can't get enough of 'gay pride')? All throughout history, those with the power displayed it with pride and pageantry. The British Empire didn’t hide its domination over much of the world. The Romans made sure everyone knew who was boss. The Spanish Empire was very visibly Hispanic. And yet, how strange that the greatest empire of all time, the Empire of Judea, will not declare itself as the rulers of the world. Granted, it’s an open secret because those who know really do know who has the real power. But if they are to enjoy the graces of the Power, they better characterize the power in another way, such as ‘liberal democracy’. So, we are to make-believe that whatever Jewish Power does is about spreading ‘liberal democracy’. Or ‘human rights’. Or ‘progress’. And if those concepts are too generic to inspire excitement, just pretend that the current 'liberal democratic' hegemony is about proselytizing globo-homo. At one time, most people would have gagged at the idea of the West spreading homo-worship around the world, but Jewish Power has warped the West into a radically different kind of civilization via its control over the media, academia, entertainment, and advertising. Homos(and even trannies) have been elevated to angelic status and associated with ‘rainbow’ happy-feely rapture. And so, many people in the West, especially in upper echelons, now believe that the West is the best and ‘most evolved’ because it is most adulatory of holy homos. But Homomania could never have been possible without the Real Power of the media, academia, state, entertainment, and advertising to indoctrinate the lesser-elites and ‘nudge’ the masses in that direction. And Jews knew that narcissistic homos would be totally loyal because homo privilege grew out of Jewish favoritism. It’s like, without God, angels would be nothing. And without George Soros, so many NGO’s would be nothing. Homos, in their venality and vanity(though there’s plenty of that among cuckservatives of GOP as well), favor privilege-uber-alles. They don’t care how morally and socially destructive Homomania is to society-as-a-whole as long as they get theirs. (We are living in the age of personal greed that promotes partial empowerment at the expense of the empowerment of the whole. We are told how wonderful it is for women to be ‘empowered’ by equality in the workplace, but no one thinks to ask what impact this has on society as a whole. With women taking more jobs from men, more men are rendered less marriageable. With women at work, they have less time for family and children. So, society-as-a-whole is dis-empowered in favor of partial empowerment of individuals or certain groups. It’s like empowering the tongue at the expense of the rest of the body. As we know, over-eating is bad for the whole body, but suppose the tongue insists on being 'empowered' with its constant demand for sweet & creamy stuff. Good for the tongue but bad for the body that grows fat and diabetic. Men and women are biologically different and essential for different but complementary roles. Also, men need good jobs to get married and have a family while this is far less true of women. Men don’t mind supporting a housewife, but women do mind supporting a househusband. Also, if we allow men with high-paying jobs to marry women with high-paying jobs, two high salaries go into ONE household, and the result is capitalism at its worst that militates against the meaningful bio-socialism of National Humanism, aka Left-Right Neo-Fascism. Empowering the part at the expense of the whole will eventually undo any society. A part of society may gain MORE choice in the short run but, in failing to fulfill its essential role, society-as-a-whole grows sick and dies. The essential role of women is to bear children and create the next generation as inheritors of culture, memory, values, and meaning. Now, that is NOT THE ONLY function of females, but biologically speaking, it is the most essential. After all, you exist only because your mother had you. And your mother exists because her mother had her. So, before anything, there must be life. Existence must be the essence. This doesn’t mean a woman should have 10 kids, but she should at least have enough to maintain replacement levels so that future generations will carry on with the torch of identity, heritage, and culture. But because so many modern women only think in terms of MY choice, money, and status(as a young thrill-seeking woman) than duty and obligation[to biology and history], they fail to understand that their empowerment as careerists actually disempower them as wives and mothers who pass the torch down to the next generation. People today live like they are immortal, the individuals of the end of history when, in fact, they are just links in a chain. The 60s Counterculture swaggered like it discovered the Fountain of Youth, as if the young people constituted an autonomous identity; it is one reason why the boomers had an Aging Crisis right after college, as illustrated in THE GRADUATE. But look at the boomers today. Those born in 1945 are now quite old, and even the later boomers are passing from middle age to seniority. So many boomers are disoriented in their older years because they fixated so much on identifying with youth(and even raised their children the same way, which is why their kids identify more with Pop Culture than with their own folks and real culture). The cult of partial empowerment is one of the biggest problems facing the modern world, and this danger comes mainly from women’s demand for equal opportunity in upper-level employment. Such selfishness not only takes jobs from men[who need them more] but prevent women from fulfilling their roles as mothers and creators of the next generation. Would it make sense to empower everyone equally in a football team? Suppose offensive linemen complain that they don’t get to pass or run with the ball. So, in the name of equal empowerment for all players, the quarterback has to block while the offensive lineman gets to handle the ball. So, what will happen? The quarterback, who isn’t physically made for blocking, will get crushed. And the offensive lineman will most likely make a mess of the play. Capitalist feminism is worse than communist feminism. The latter stressed women as workers equal to men as workers. It was about working women married to working men. In contrast, capitalist feminism is all about women striving to reach higher, looking down on rest of humanity as 'losers', and hooking up with ultra-successful men to hog all the wealth and privilege for themselves.
Homomaniacs are just as bad as capitalist-feminists. A sane society knows that homosexuality is deviant and gross but also acknowledges that homos tend to have certain talents in creativity and insight. Also, it’s irrefutable that homos are born that way, and therefore, cannot be blamed for being homo. So, homos should be tolerated, and their contributions to society should be appreciated. It turns out homos do have a key role to play in civilization, especially in arts and design. But in their pride and vanity, bitchy homos demand more. They demand that the homo minority be empowered at the expense of society as a whole. Consider what sicko homomania did to marriage.
Sane people understand the essential meaning and importance of marriage. They know it’s a meeting of biological truth and moral necessity. Homosexuality cannot live up to those standards because it is about fecal penetration and unnatural & dysfunctional acts. But homos insisted on their ‘sexuality’ being recognized as equal in biological categorization(that would have us believe a homo man's anus is a 'sex organ' like a woman's vagina) and moral meaning. So, society as a whole has been force-fed the lie of ‘two daddies’ or ‘two mommies’ when, in fact, the kids involved are the products of heterosexuality, a mother and a father. When a society begins to lie to itself like that to appease the vanity of a tiny narcissistic minority that happens to be favored by corrupt and demented Jews, it grows diseased as a whole. Notice that Jews have gotten ever more emboldened in their mendacity after having hookwinked the goyim with nonsense time and time again. They feel, "If we can put this BS over them, what can we not get away with?" Jews see the world in terms of hands and clay. Jews see themselves as the hands and see dumb goyim as the clay that can be molded into anything. Jewish hands turned the clay ‘gay’.)
How is it that a power so great can remain a secret(even if an open secret to some)? Other than the Jewish control of media, academia, and whore politicians, it is because Jews don’t have an obviously mighty national center. There is Israel, but it is more a beneficiary of Worldwide Jewish Power than its progenitor. In essence, Jewish Power is about minority networking across the globe than centered in a nation that is majority Jewish. Even in the nation where Jews have the most power, the US, they are merely 2% of the population. In France, UK, Germany, Russia, Brazil, Mexico, and other nations where Jews have considerable influence, they are an even smaller percentage of the population.
In contrast, Great Britain was not only mostly Anglo but transformed into a great national power before it expanded worldwide into a great imperial power. Same was true of France. Their imperial power grew out of their national power. Jews were never the dominant majority in a nation deemed a great power. Jews gained power as minorities, and it was this networking and coordination that made Zionism and Israel possible. Indeed, despite Israel’s successes, it wouldn’t have amounted to much IF NOT for the backing of the big powers(that take orders from Jewish elites). So, Jewish influence could hide within the power of goy-majority nations. Since most UK politicians are British and most French politicians are French, a carefree observer may believe that UK is ruled by Brits and France is ruled by the French... and that the US is ruled mostly by white non-Jews since most politicians are white gentiles. But in fact, as Jews control the banks, high-tech, profitable vice industries, media, academia, and the Narrative, they use most goy politicians as sockpuppets or cuckpuppets. Jews pull the strings, but because Jews-as-puppet-masters is deemed an 'antisemitic trope', Jews can easily denounce and destroy anyone who notices Jewish strings that animate the goy puppets. So, the truth about Jews must not be said because bad 'anti-semites' once used to peddle such bigotry. Most people are driven more by a sense of right or wrong than true or false, i.e. they are less interested in the facts of Jewish power than governed by taboos decreeing what is approved and what is outrageous. Shows like THE VIEW are less about sharing information than controlling mass opinion by cuing the audience as to which views will elicit applause or opprobrium.
Because Jews can use goy politicians as fronts — some of these fronts or buffers are truly laughable, like dummy-doll rubber-boy Marco Rubio — , it can go a long way to maintain the facade that Jews don’t have all that much power. Just focus on Marco the dummy, and don’t pay any heed to the Jewish donors who prop him up. Just focus on Hillary and forget about her biggest donors all being Jewish oligarchs. Even though Jews can’t fool everyone, they can fool enough people, certainly the majority as most goyim are either gullible or too distracted with trashy pop culture to care about the world. As for the elites in politics, media, and academia, they either fear or are owned by Jewish Power. Rubio is a dummy, but he surely knows that he’s a puppet-dog of the Jews. He chooses to be one because it’s better than being a total non-entity, which is what he’d be without his Jewish backers. Why would he or anyone else in politics dare speak the truth? Why not just go along with the charade and be treated as ‘statesmen’ by the compliant media and dummy electorate? "Well, it’s a living."
If Jews had a great national base, perhaps they’d be more forthright in their power projections. Their global power would be like the rays emanating from the Sun. Russia and China have gigantic national power bases. Even if China or Russia were to withdraw from the world, it would be a considerable power in its own right. Same is true of Iran, at least within the context of Middle Eastern politics. But Jews have no such power. Their power depends on controlling the cuck-elites and minions of goy nations. If there were no Jews in UK, France, Russia, Germany, US, Brazil, Mexico, and etc, those nations go on as usual. They may suffer from lack of Jewish genius, but there are enough smart and even genius people in many goy nations to keep the system going just fine. But what would Jewish power be if it couldn't control and manipulate goyim? Jewish Power cannot be the Sun -- Jews on their own lack sufficient demographic mass to become a world power -- , which is why they rely on the power of mirrors to direct goy sun-rays to suit Jewish interests. This is why it’s so important for Jews to control the media(and why Jews hate RT and alternative media so much). Via the media, Jews can control the direction of rays to create a false illusion of reality, such as the ‘Russia Collusion’ hoax.
Because the Empire of Judea is a Secret Empire, the power dynamics around the world seems downright surreal at times. Also, the Jewish Empire is the only great empire where the ruling people have played an insignificant or even non-existent role in the military dimensions of the expansion. While all great empires had to eventually rely on foreign mercenaries, slaves, or conscripts for manpower, they all began with domestic ‘national’ commanders & troops who continued to play a central role even as the empire grew ever larger. For most of its history, Roman Empire relied on Roman manpower. British troops did most to maintain the empire in all five continents. This was also true of the French, Russian, and Japanese empires. And the Anglo-American Empire up to World War II was mostly about white Americans fighting in neo-imperialist wars. In contrast, apart from Jewish role in Bolshevism and Zionism, Jews have done everything to avoid military combat. (It’s no wonder Jews were overwhelmingly for lifting the draft during the Vietnam War. They didn’t want their kids to die in wars.) Jewish Bolsheviks were fierce & committed warriors and could be as ruthless and bloody as any other military force. Communism was the ONE universalist idea for which many Jews were willing to fight and die for. The OTHER idea for which they were willing to fight and die for was Zionism and for obvious reasons. (Nothing fuels courage like nationalism.) But when it came to all other conflicts and struggles, Jews preferred to out-source all the fighting, killing, and dying to goyim. Jewish Power goaded the UK and US to enter World War II to defeat Nazi Germany, though ultimately, it was Germany and Japan's recklessness that drew USSR and US into the war. Jewish Power pushed the US into Wars for Israel beginning with the Gulf War. Especially in the Wars for Israel, Jews preferred to do the talking while making goyim do all the walking. This is why many goyim are upset with Jews who call for these wars to stop ‘new hitlers’ while refusing to do the fighting themselves.(But then, it doesn't matter what the masses have to say. Whispers from within the castle ring louder in the ears of the king than cries from outside the walls. It's the Jewish insiders who have the ears of Presidents.) If indeed Jews really want to face off against all these Muslim nations, then American Jews should all move to Israel, pick up arms, and wage war on Iran and any other nation they don’t like. But Israeli troops are maintained just to defend Israel, and Jews insist that AMERICAN GOYIM must militarily deal with Iran. Zionist soldiers exist to preserve Israel’s national integrity while goy soldiers exist to serve Jewish imperialist ambitions. Imagine a Jew who wants the house of a rival to be burned to the ground. If so, why doesn’t he risk his own life & limb(and those of his sons) to raid and burn down the rival's house? Too risky, so he and his sons remain safely ensconced in their own house and will risk their lives only when the house itself is threatened. As for burning down the other house, Jews call on goyim to do it. Thus, it is goyim who end up risking life & limb in the process. Also, if the house-burning ends up especially ugly, all the blame goes to the goyim while the Jews, the very people who instigated the attack, watch from a distance and lament the cruelty of wicked goyim. Notice how Jewish Hollywood, with the movie VICE, tries to dump the blame for the Iraq War on the lap of Dick Cheney as the evil mastermind. (Never mind that Cheney & Bush relented to Neocon demands to win over rich & powerful Jews to the GOP.)
Now, of course, Jews know what is really up. Granted, not all Jews as there are plenty of naive or stupid Jews. Also, some Jews are just lost in degeneracy or ridiculous enough to 'get high on their own supply'. Smart Jews mold and push certain ideologies to serve the ‘higher’ purpose of IIGFJ or "Is it good for Jews?"
To be sure, ideological Jews may be lauded for their earnest commitment to the cause, but purity of principles hardly makes sense in the 21st century. When many Jews were earnestly communist, socialist, or libertarian, one could at least acknowledge the worthiness of those causes in their times and places. Communism and socialism arose at a time when many laborers lived in wretched conditions. Even if history has judged Marxism to have done more harm than good, it was fueled by noble sentiments and urgent necessities. As for Jews who championed liberalism or libertarianism(Ayn Rand and Milton Friedman), we can appreciate their commitment to individualism & liberty. Also, we mustn’t forget that during the Cold War, many intelligent people believed the Communist East would eventually prevail over the Capitalist West. Neo-liberal economics was once a minority view in media and academia, and it took certain individuals of courage and principles to stand up for them. (Also, it’s probably fair to say that many such economists had no idea that their theories would end up leading to new monstrosities.) Even if Francis Fukuyama was overly simplistic in declaring the End of History upon the closure of the Cold War, he was correct at least in one sense: No new ideology since then has carried any intellectual or moral weight. Indeed, one could argue that the Age of Ideology gave way to Age of ‘Idology’(ideology-of-idolatry). The Power always favors idology over ideology. When Stalin and Mao gained supreme power, they didn’t want to be challenged by ideological arguments(as the logic of ideology has its own rules independent of the ruler's wishes). Stalin and Mao wanted to be obeyed unconditionally, and that required everyone to worship them as idols than approach them as standard-bearers of ideology. A political order that prioritizes ideology can expose anyone, even the powerful, as ideologically deficient. This is what Martin Luther did in his protest against the Catholic Church(though, on the subconscious level, it may have been his repressed quasi-pagan Teutonic energies railing against the high civilization of Rome all over again, just like the explosive oratory of men like Martin Luther King was as much an outburst of repressed Afro-savage energies as delivery of spiritual message). Martin Luther had the better theological arguments against the much corrupted Church that relied more and more on iconography and ritualism to maintain its power. Ideology is about "Believe me because my argument is correct." An argument can always be counter-argued. Idology is about "Believe me because I, yes the glorious I, am right." It is a Cult of Personality.
|Nicolae Ceaucescu and Kim Il-Sung, two ideological-intellectual zeroes whose power and prestige rested on obnoxious cult of personality that stressed 'idology'.|
Fukuyama was right about the End of History if ‘history’ means Struggle for Ideology. No new ideology has emerged since the End of the Cold War to inspire a new vision or new order. But what he failed to see was the Beginning of Idology. The power became less about ideas and values than about ‘idological’ faith in certain key figures symbolizing the sanctity of certain groups. So, MLK and Mandela are to be worshiped as god-men, and their holiness radiates the entire black race(at least in their relation to non-blacks) as a sacred people. And don't you dare pay attention to the reality of black crime and violence. Just fixate idologically on Emmitt Till as the saintly black child who, like Prometheus chained to a cliff, is lynched over and over by Evil White 'Racists' for all eternity in the sanctum of Media Space. And if you deviate from Magic Negro Idology, you are ‘racist’. This is great for black power because all the cold facts and hard evidence points to black violence, black thuggery, black mendacity, black savagery, black criminality, black megalomania. The reason why Africa is such a mess is because of lower black IQ, higher black psychopathy, black penchant for violence, and etc. The reason why America’s biggest problem flows from the black community like filth from sewer is due to black nature that is innately savage and anti-civilization. But because blacks are holy according to the present idology, we are supposed to believe that all black problems are the product of white evil. (If blacks are sacred idols, whites are voodoo dolls of wickedness.) And we are to tell ourselves that Black Africa could have been one big Wakanda if not for Western Imperialism -- presumably American Indians could be traveling in space teepees to Mars and beyond if not for the arrival of Pale Face. So, it doesn’t matter that Colin Flaherty has tirelessly amassed tons of evidence to prove many times over that black violence is the #1 criminal issue in America. Youtube and other platforms have censored him for speaking the truth because it is ‘racist’ against the ‘idological’ worship of blacks as sacred objects. https://www.bitchute.com/channel/4u5pMggbpv1R/ As for Jews, they are always innocent, always wise & noble, always in need of our sympathy no matter how much power they have and no matter how badly they act. Even when Jews act like Neo-Nazis in West Bank and Gaza against Palestinians, we are supposed to believe they’re a bunch of Anne Franks(indeed Anne Franks forever).And to close out the Holy Three, there is the ‘idology’ of homos who are to be regarded as new angels. Why did HIV epidemic happen? Never ever blame the homos. Don’t think about how all those homos in bathhouses acted foul and filthy and spread germs far and wide in endless orgies of fecal penetration. The blame goes to ‘bigots’ than to ‘buggots’. Blame Ronald Reagan for not coming up with a miracle cure instantly, and blame ‘homophobes’ for their lack of compassion. Never mind that the ‘homophobes’ gave the homos the best advice: "Be careful with all that gross butt-fuc*ing cuz it’s one helluva way to spread the HIV germ."faucet must be turned on at full blast to flood the white tub with multi-culti water that feels ‘warmer’ to Jews. So, it was British Jews who spearheaded the Afro-Islamization of Great Britain. It was all in the name of IIGFJ or "Is it good for Jews?" Jews, as the Holy Holocaust people, told white elites that UK is ‘racist’ and ‘Nazi-like’ UNLESS it opens the floodgates to the Third World. Jews told whites that homogeneity is a pathology, and diversity is the cure. (That must be why diverse Latin America, North Africa, and Central Asia have been heaven on earth.) Jews, in their chutzpah, even claimed that Britain has always been a ‘nation of immigrants’ because it had been invaded and ravaged by Romans, Vikings, and others when it was divided, weak, and relatively primitive. Because Jews, as Holocaust Geniuses, had intellectual, verbal, financial, and moral advantage over whites, the British elites just caved to every demand, and the result is London and other major cities of Great Britain becoming majority non-white. Of course, Jews generally don’t say they pulled off this foul deed for their own tribal self-aggrandizement; instead, they pontificate about their compassion for the poor and wretched around the world. But if so, why do Jews in Europe also welcome rich non-white elites who are doing just fine in their own nations? Also, if Jewishness is all about supporting the underdog against the top dog, why are Jews so angry with Jeremy Corbyn who apparently took Jewish morality to heart and decided to support the oppressed Palestinians against Zionist imperialists? The only thing that counts is ‘Is it good for Jews?’
What is most jarring, strange, and unique about Jewish Hegemony is it is so big on hushed pride(and arrogance and megalomania) than open pride. All other great powers in the past not only bragged of their power but exaggerated it, like a bird spreading its flumes to make itself seem bigger than it is. Even in their precipitous declines, the Spanish Empire, Ottoman Empire, and French Empire tried to maintain the illusion of grandeur and invincibility, that is until some major crisis finally popped the bubble and laid bare their actual power that proved to be far less than they’d projected. They were like a rich man bragging of unlimited wealth despite being close to bankruptcy. In contrast, Jews are obsessed with hiding their power. It’s like a rich man who pretends to be poor. In this, Jewish power is like the Mafia. In GOODFELLAS and CASINO, the top mob bosses who have lots of money try to pass themselves as just regular guys. They don’t want to be noticed. They know their wealth is illegitimate and fear drawing attention to what they’re really up to.
On some level, Jews feel that their wealth and power are illegitimate too. One difference between Jewish power and past goy power is that the latter had wealth, demographics, and military might. When Roman empire was on the rise, Romans not only had the wealth but Roman demographics and military might to back up the wealth and pride. But, Jews lack the numbers. And even as Jewish power has its hooks into the deep state that controls the military, most of the military is not Jewish, which is why Jews seek to use globohomo stuff to proxy-Judaize the military, i.e. a military whose highest priority is ‘celebrate homos and trannies’ is bound to favor minority-supremacism than majority-nationalism. The lack of Jewish numbers and Jewish-dominant military makes Jewish power very nervous as it relies on the power of money and media: Money to bribe people with, the media to hypnotize the masses with. But bribery only goes so far, and people may break out of the spell, after which it is very difficult to pull them back in. You can fool a dummy, but once the dummy turns cynic, it’s hard to put the cynic back in the dummy bottle. It’s like adults can fool children only so many times. Once the spell is broken, no amount of doubling down can reboot the world to an earlier state. You can't fool a child into believing in Santa once he knows the truth. Jews fear that the spell may be finally breaking because their divide-and-rule strategy is backfiring on them. Jews invoked ‘white privilege’ to rally non-whites against whites. Thus, Jews sought to use non-white goyim against white goyim. Jews also invoked ‘holy holocaust Jews’ and ‘Judeo-Christianity’ shtick to make white goyim support Israel and Jews. HOWEVER, many non-whites are figuring out that Jews are the #1 beneficiaries of White Privilege, and a growing number of whites are beginning to think, "Why should we whites defend Jews when Jews get non-whites to hate us and replace us?"
Another way Jews seek to hide their own power is by associating themselves with certain much-idolized(mostly by Jew-run media) groups such as blacks or ‘immigrants’(as if today’s marauding third worlders are anything like the European immigrants who passed through Ellis Island over 100 yrs ago). Naturally, Jews will favor certain groups as holy victims based on the latter’s maximum-damage-value against whites and minimum-damage-value against Jews. This is why Jews would rather NOT talk about Palestinians, whose narrative has maximum-damage-value against Jews. Jews would rather talk about blacks because Black American History has maximum-damage-value against American whites. (Likewise, Senator Jesse Helms championed Soviet Dissidents because doing so had maximum-damage-value against the Left while costing his side nothing morally. Though political morality speaks of higher and universal values, the choice of focus-issues tends to favor certain groups while disfavoring others. For instance, discussion of black slavery in America not only condemns the practice of slavery in general but especially burdens whites for the practice. If the main focus were on blacks-selling-blacks into slavery in Africa, the ‘evil’ of the practice would mainly taint blacks. Morality may aspire toward universal truths, but the examples used to illustrate lessons particularize moral advantage and disadvantage among various groups. Jews know how this works, which is why they use their control of the Narrative to always use examples that makes Jews & their allies look good while making whites and enemies-of-Jews look bad. For example, Jews mention ‘antisemitic’ pogroms in the Pale of Settlement but ignore Zionist pogroms against Palestinians in the Nakba to make a point about the dangers of ethnic violence. So, even though the over-arching lesson may be universal — explosions of ethnic violence are wrong everywhere —, people come away with the impression that Russians/Ukrainians/Slavs are particularly bad while Jews are especially deserving of sympathy. Jews know that the trick is, "Preach universal morality via particular selectivity so that the higher good will be associated with nobility of Jews and perfidy of gentiles." It’s like Jews constructed a universal one-and-only God but chose themselves as the particular people with special Covenant with God. One thing for sure, precisely because Jews with great wealth and privilege are vulnerable to scrutiny as the New Ruling Elites, they seek to preempt the criticism with loud denunciations related to issues with maximum-harm-value against whites to create the impression that they are still ‘spiritual’ underdogs whose main occupation is fighting than having power. Cognizant of America’s history of race-relations, Jews make the most noise about injustice to blacks during the Slavery and ‘Jim Crow’ era. But then, the ritual of guilt-baiting whites over blacks works ONLY IF Americans ignore or are amnesiac about what has happened in America since the 1960s when explosions of savage black violence laid waste to so many cities. An honest assessment of race relations would indicate that whites are more deserving of sympathy as victims of black brutality. Also and surely, there are far worse victims around the world in our time, not least the Muslims and Arabs who came into the cross-hairs of the Zionist Neocon and Neolib foreign policy that schemed to use US military and proxy forces to smite All Enemies of Israel. But then, those matters have maximum-harm-value against Jews, and so, best not to mention them in the Jew-run Media.) Now, it’s been noted that there were Jews in the American South, and they owned slaves too, indeed on a higher per capita basis than non-Jew whites. Furthermore, most southern Jews were staunchly pro-Confederate and ‘free trade’, meaning they favored Southern States trading with UK than with the North that offered higher-priced goods. Still, the history of Black Slavery in America is essentially a white Christian affair. (It was different in Latin America, especially Brazil, where pseudo-converso Jews dominated much of the slave trade, but because Jews control the academic narrative and media propaganda, few people know of the full extent of the Jewish role in the business of bondage, just like almost no one in the US knows that it was the Jewish Sassoon family that dominated the opium trade in China that destroyed millions of lives, and of course, it is the venal Sackler family that knowingly and willfully addicted countless white Americans to opioids to rake in billions and to commit silent genocide against the white working class — if some Wasp-dominated drug company had knowingly targeted Jews, blacks, or some non-white ethnic group in such manner, the Jew-run media would call it the second holocaust, but notice how the Jew-run media sought to suppress all news stories of White Death and Jewish involvement in it until evidence mounted up to a point where even the foul New York Times couldn't ignore it anymore. Jews not only seek to replace whites with massive invasions by Third Worlders but try to kill them with drugs. Madoff and Sacklers have one thing in common: They were able to get away with so much bad behavior because they were protected by Jewish media and Jewish law firms. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zw9EhjyU3JU&bpctr=1551979097. Venal Jews use soft-censoring — ‘limited state’ indeed — so that they can pretend they are not censoring. It’s like how Jews got the power but pretend not to have it. But thankfully, the video is not censored on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jFZIQHA47xhU/. David Duke is a tainted figure who has said and done lots of stupid and even contemptible things in the past, but he is one of the most courageous figures to stand up to Jewish Supremacism. It is no wonder that Jews plotted with EU to ban David Duke videos in all of Europe that is, instead, inundated with Jewish-made interracist propaganda that promotes ACOWW or Afro-Colonization of White Wombs on the basis that black men, as the superior race, should take white women from inferior white women whose only words should be, "I’m a cuck!")brash Jews who talk too much make more sensible Jews feel very nervous. Ironically, Jews who make a big deal about Jewish superiority tend not be the smartest Jews, just like white supremacist types are hardly the smartest whites and hardcore libertarians are hardly the smartest individuals. It seems the lesser members of any group or movement need to beat their chests to compensate for their lack of personal value.) It’s no wonder Jews are neurotic. They are so virulently noisy in silencing everyone about Jewish Power. It’s the loudest Shhhhhhhh ever heard.
Also, Jewish ambition is different from goy ambitions. Anglo-Americans were content with the American Century, but Jews are aiming for the Jewish Millennium. A Tribe that has survived for close to 4,000 yrs against all odds, Jews see history differently than most other peoples do. Because Jews see the long game, they are not only feisty and dogged but cold and reflective, just like Hyman Roth who can be bitter, spiteful, and tough-as-nails but also deceptively calm and wisely strategic. Jews generally lack romanticism. Their passion is a long burn inside the furnace than a bonfire in the night. Thus, Jewish power is able to burn more steadily, stealthily, and for longer. In contrast, the ‘Aryans’ with the ‘romantic’ and ‘heroic’ soul tend to get all excited and charge into things. This can lead to great achievements and leaps & bounds, but it can also leads to jumps off the cliff. Or, the obsession with excitement can make the victory seem boring. When the Jew wins, he concentrates on plugging all the holes and debugging all the problems so that he can keep the power for good. The Jew is never bored as he isn’t only a player but a tireless book-keeper(like Ace Rothstein in CASINO the movie). Jews, whose minds can obsess about just about anything with hair-splitting or diamond-cutting precision, can easily fend off boredom. It's like the Jewish guy whose entire life revolves around numbers in PI by Darren Aronofsky. In contrast, there is something childlike about the 'Aryan' soul that needs to 'go out and play' to feel the excitement. A Jewish kid indoors can fill up his time with books, violin lessons, chess, or mastering card tricks or magic. In contrast, 'Aryan' kids need to go out and play ball or go hunting to feel alive.
When the ‘Aryan’ wins, dissipation often sets in for lack of fresh excitements. This is the difference between Jews who run casinos and gentiles who try out their luck. Jewish casino bosses know the odds; it’s all set up to rob the stupid gentiles. It is not excitement but intensity that Jews seek. They are intense in their commitment to keep the operation running to take more money from goyim. In contrast, the goyim blow their money because they love the excitement and razzle-dazzle of the play. Players and machines make all the noise while the Jewish bosses in the backrooms watch over the games and collect all the money. Then, it is not surprising that the Prophecy favored the Jews in the inheritance of the world. In Martin Scorsese's CASINO, the Jewish casino operator Ace Rothstein understands the big picture better than any of the goombas who only care about fast cash in their hands. In the end, it is the other members of the Tribe, the Wall Street Jews, who totally take over Las Vegas. Mind wins over Muscle.
And yet, the prophecy that came true is not what God promised to Abraham and his descendants. God told Abraham that his Tribe will be a great people that will bless and be blessed by the world IF they are good and virtuous. But modern Jews didn’t inherit the world by being good and decent. The one time Jews did join a great moral movement in earnest passion turned out badly for everyone, both Jews and gentiles. That was communism, but then, as a secular ideology it was a rejection of the Covenant among Jewish communists. Even though Jews used their intelligence, talent, and knowledge to do tremendous good for the world and accumulated great wealth legitimately, too much of Jewish wealth came by the way of criminality, chicanery, or moral corruption. Jews played a huge role of organized crime in US, Interwar Germany, and Russia, a fact often overlooked because of the image of Italian gangsters in American pop culture. Also, a lot of Jewish behavior in finance, law, and entertainment was in the grey area between legality and crookedness. And Jewish wealth from vice industries such as gambling, pornography, and drugs is technically legitimate but ONLY BECAUSE Jewish clout bought up politicians to legalize questionable activities and behaviors. Jewish influence turned gambling from a seedy vice to ‘Las Vegas, the Christmas place to be’. Jews not only pioneered the legalization and spread of pornography but, with far dire consequences, basically pornified mainstream culture to the point where prime time TV shows are close to pornography and youth entertainment isn’t far from kiddie and teen porn. Jews turned Disney into a degenerate-culture factory that produces the likes of Miley Cyrus. And the Jewish Sacklers and many others of the Tribe turned the pharmaceutical industry into essentially a narcotics operations. Opioids peddled by the Sacklers — made legal by bribery and collusion — had almost no medicinal value and were designed to be addictive to the targeted population of the white working class. It was a chemical bait-and-switch, offering pain-killers that were actually turning the users into high-seekers.
So, our world is not a happy prophecy of Jews reaping rewards for exemplary behavior. It is a dark and satanic prophecy of Jews having gained control over the world by hook or by crook. But then, as the saying goes, ‘nice guys finish last’. The Jewish Covenant was based on faith that there is the one and only true God as the final judge watching over Jews and the World. And so, whenever things went badly for Jews, they believed they’d offended God and sought redemption in His eyes. But as Jewish thought moved away from Torah to Talmud, they begin to twist and turn the original narratives and meanings to suit their temporal temptations. Jewish focus went from the Torah, the book written by Prophets inspired by God, to the Talmud as a proto-lawyerly rationalization of increasingly unethical Jewish behavior in relation to Gentiles. We see the final result of such moral-spiritual corruption in today’s ultra-orthodox Jews who assure each other that Jewish souls are holy while gentiles are like donkeys whose lives can be sacrificed if it's good for Jews. Still, because Talmudic Jews are still religious, on some level they know they must justify themselves before God. Even if they twisted the meaning of their religion into an brazenly ugly tribal supremacism, they do believe in the existence and preeminence of the true and good God(even if He is mainly good for Jews at the expense of everyone else). But, in the nether regions of Talmudic thought was the notion that there are darker forces animating the universe, i.e. it’s not so simple as the case of one and only God commanding all the world. Perhaps, God has a shadow, a doppelganger of ambiguous identity and quality, that works underhandedly to move world events, just like physicists speak of matter and anti-matter. And in order for Jews to fulfill their prophecy, perhaps it wasn’t enough to plead with or justify themselves before God. After all, every student knows he cannot depend on the master alone. The master stands for high principles and standards. He teaches the student the proper way, but no one gets anywhere in life simply by adhering to purity of principles. When theory meets practice, theory must break out of the shell and shake hands with the devil(in the details). In the end, the world isn’t as clean and predictable as stated in the text book. It’s like the scene in BACK TO SCHOOL where Rodney Dangerfield schools the highly respected professor, the authority on pure economics, on the way of the real world.
Now, the fact that Jews gained great wealth and power by questionable means is hardly new in history. Power by hook and by crook is as old as history itself. Still, it is jarring because Jews aren’t an ordinary people but ones who’ve regarded themselves as the holiest people. In our collective imagination, Jews are infinitely more significant and symbolic than, say, lowlife Gypsies or cutthroat Chechens. If there’s a filthy rich Gypsy or Chechen, most people will hardly be surprised that an especially vile member of the generally grubby clan made it big by nefarious means. In contrast, there’s a lot of moral, spiritual, and historical baggage with Jews — indeed, the extremely negative stereotypes of Jews cannot be understood apart from the extremely high expectations of Jews as the Original People of the Book and/or resilient survivors of tragic history; in other words, extreme anger toward Jews is, at least in part, due to a sense of betrayal upon seeing-the-real-Jew-at-last; it’s like expecting Moses as Charlton Heston but discovering he’s really Mel Brooks who threatens your daughter, "Hump or Die". (Given that gentiles ‘stole’ the Jewish God for themselves via Christianity, the moral upmanship against Jews was partly a means to mask the shame of their failure or inability to create a comparable spiritual-moral system on their own. Suppose I steal your idea, but instead of admitting my crime and indebtedness, I hide my shame by claiming that I’m the one who truly appreciated and improved on the idea whereas you failed to understand the full worth of what you had, and therefore it really belongs to me and the hell with you.)
Furthermore, the Covenant wasn’t a brazen piece of nihilist supremacism — "we are the best simply because we are, and we can trample on anyone for the hell of it" — but a conditional contract that promised Jews great honor and glory IF they were the most moral and wise of all peoples. God’s blessing on the Jews depended on the goodness of Jews. And, in the aftermath of World War II and Shoah, even secular Jews, despite their lack of faith, presented the Jewish Narrative as essentially profoundly moral and meaningful, i.e. Jews, having been ‘persecuted’ for so long and having survived one of the greatest horrors of all time(if not the most horrible), had attained special wisdom and understanding that only comes to the most tragic and contemplative of peoples. Every Jew was like a little messiah, and Anne Frank was like the New Madonna of the Modern World.
Now, if Christianity has been charged with murder and sentenced to death on the ‘rainbow’-sparking electric chair of Homomania, then the rise of Jewish Power is to be greeted as the new dawn of human consciousness, achievement, and affirmation. In other words, the prophecy was not the return of Jesus but rise of Jews as little messiahs. Then, we can understand why Jews are most blessed and most cursed by humanity. Those who accept the moral claims of Jews admire and revere the Tribe as the holiest people, but those who think they see the Jewish face behind the mask see the Tribe as the synagogue of Satan.
Critics of Jewish Power might regard it differently(and with far less hostility) if not for all the historical, spiritual, and cultural baggage of Judaism and Jewish experience. After all, there are plenty of rich Chinese and Hindus, but we just see them as filthy rich people or people-with-too-much-money. We don’t see them as anything else or expect transcendence from them. But because of the significance around Jews, be it spiritual-moral-historical-cultural-or-what-have-you, we tend to regard Jewish Power as somehow connected with either the Will of God or the grand trajectory of history. And yet, when we take a close look at Jewish Power, so much is tawdry, vile, and disgusting. And the hypocrisy between what Jews morally claim and how they play the game. There is a mile-wide discrepancy between Jewish talk and Jewish walk. The problem isn’t that Jews aren’t saints or far-from-perfect, as that goes for all of humanity. Rather, it's that Jewish abuses, greed, and pathologies have grown so out-of-control, excessive, and demented, especially as nearly all of Jewish power have converged on globo-homo supremacism. Non-Jews have long condemned Jewish involvement in leftist movements, BUT in retrospect, those Jews were far less dangerous than today’s ultra-capitalist globo-homo Jews. Because of the huge role of communism in the 20th century, people over-estimated the dangers posed by leftist Jews. What they failed to grasp was that the spread of communism was a fluke, an accident of history. Russian Revolution was the product of World War I that ravaged so much of Russia and created a power vacuum for radicals. And Eastern Europe fell to communism ONLY BECAUSE Nazi Germany invaded Russia and lost. And China turned communist ONLY BECAUSE the dominant KMT(the National Party) and Japanese imperialists wore each other down, thereby leaving a political void to be filled by communists. If not for the reckless aggressions of right-wing regimes(reactionary monarchies or radical fascist states) in World War I and World War II, communism would have been a far weaker force in the 20th century, the main trajectory of which favored the rise of capitalist oligarchies. Had right-wing regimes been more responsible & level-headed and avoided World War I, the story of the 20th century would have been of the fading of monarchies & aristocracies and the inexorable rise of capitalist oligarchies — and, most likely, no major nation would have turned communist. Under such circumstances, something like communism might have been a valuable critical tool against the all-pervasive power of capitalism. But because of communist revolutions and huge Jewish role in it, so many people assumed that defeat of communism would be a victory for freedom and the political ‘right’. But actually, Jews had far more to gain from capitalism than from communism, and the ‘End of History’ triumph of capitalism made Jews more powerful than ever. If anything, we can’t help feeling a bit nostalgic about past communist Jews who vigilantly critiqued the many problems of capitalism and its corrosive & disruptive effects on society and values. While Jewish communists have much blood on their hands, many(probably most) were sincerely committed to creating a new world of equal justice for all. The great tragedy of communism is the age old lesson that ‘ends do not justify the means’; also, much of humanity didn’t believe that the ends of communism were all that desirable. Jews are naturally elitist, tribal, and contemptuous of dummies, but Jewish communists struggled against their own tendencies and tried to be ONE with the gentiles. Granted, in their ideological fervor and subconscious tribalism, many Jews used communism to savor their tribal power and wreak vengeance on goyim, but the fact that Jews eventually lost out under communism suggests the system was geared to favor the goy dimwits over Jewish wits.
One thing for sure, this isn’t the End of History but the Beginning of the Prophecy(realized) but with a secret covenant with the Devil than with God. Jewish Power is now so satanic and demon-possessed — the fact that I, an atheist, feel this way about the current World Order signifies how deranged the world has become — that it’s impossible to see the Age of Jewish Prophecy as fulfillment of a noble dream. If this is what God promised the Jews, the Torah has to be fundamentally reinterpreted. Or if History with big H culminated in this moment in time, there is something truly sick at the core of human nature and human condition. Contrary to the 'more evolved' conceits of demented Homomania and ‘transhumanism’, the so-called ‘woke’ people of the 21st Century are degenerate beyond belief and must undergo drastic reformations if civilization, morality, and sanity are to be restored. Incredibly, we live in a world where the most educated and intelligent groups are infected with deranged delusions that they rabidly cling to and expound in fever-pitch. The current goy cuck-elites are like demon-possessed monsters who are utterly blind to their pseudo-moral dementia. As for Jews, their main obsession is with concocting any number of lies to serve "Is it good for Jews?" As for Negroes(who constitute the biggest danger to civilization) and homos(as the main instigators of cultural decadence now elevated to ‘sacradence’, or excrement-as-the-new-sacrament), their Core Worldview is how all of humanity exists mainly to flatter them and make offerings because Negroes and Homos are so awesome. Negroes have Wakanda on their mind, and Homos(as the Wizards of Poz), feel all the world should be turned into ‘gay’ teletubby land.
In a way, it’s understandable why Jews made a Pact with the Devil. Just like the protagonist of ALL THE KING’S MEN realizes there is ONLY ONE WAY to win, Jews figured on the same thing. Still, compromising the means to achieve certain ends is as old as the hills. America was founded on compromises that betrayed certain principles to arrive at certain objectives. Such, in and of itself, is not the problem with Jewish Power. We can’t expect any people or movement to be pristine and pure. What’s truly freakish is that the very ENDS(that the Jewish Power is striving for via the corruption of means) are vile and evil. At the very least, communist Jews sought to create a better world for workers and the underclass. They employed frightful means, but the ends had a certain nobility. In contrast, the globo-homo tribal-supremacist oligarcho-capitalist Jews are trying to turn all of goyim into trashy, cartoonish, infantile, deranged, and obedient whore-children. Consider the contradictions in the Jewish Plot to turn goyim into child-prostitutes. Worthy destination for the End of History? On the one hand, goyim are infantilized, not least because mind-stultifying ideology & ‘idology’ are fed to children at the earliest possible age. In some ways, the so-called SJW’s(aka NPCs) are as emotionally retarded as the the Kim-worshiping lunatics in North Korea(or the Chinese were under Mao). The reason why they are so ‘triggered’ is they’ve been infantilized with mindless worship of certain sacred tropes about Jews, blacks, and homos. Any form of ‘counter-signaling’ is intolerable and blasphemous to such childish minds. And yet, these big babies who throw tantrums have also been sexualized at the earliest possible age. https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/05/05/mind-pollution-the-promotion-of-sexual-perversion-on-national-tv-the-case-of-jenji-kohan/ (Perhaps, some Jews want to sound the alarm and tell fellow Tribesmen to stop with the sickness lest the goyim finally explode in anger and come after Jews. Then, why the silence for the most part? Perhaps, Jews sense that it's too late now. That ship has sailed long ago. Jews have gone all in, and it's now a matter of win-all or lose-all, a dangerous zero-sum game, like there was no going back for Japan after it bombed Pearl Harbor. If Jewish critics have something to say, they should have said it earlier. In the current situation, because things have gotten so bad, even good-willed criticism on the part of Jews will not lead to appreciation from 'Jew-haters' but will be seen as signs of weakness to exploit to bring down the Jew.) The Jew-run media and academia raise no alarm bells about children having access to porn even before they’re teenagers. Disney and other companies market quasi-prostitute dress and makeup to young girls. Stuff like ‘twerking’ and rapping about ‘muh dick’ are peddled as ‘empowerment’ to kids. The satanic Jewish Prophetic way is to infantilize the minds even for adults and sexualize the body even for children. This trans-genderism-for-kids isn’t just an LGBTQI(add more alphabets, please) issue but a means to sexualize children from a young age. From this, it’s obvious that not only are Jewish means corrupt and compromised but the Jewish ends themselves are crazy, indeed even worse than the means. It’s one thing to soil one’s hands to do some good in the world. Suppose a man runs a brothel to make money to send his kids to college so that they won’t have to do what he did. There’s at least some redemptive quality in that. WOMAN IN THE RUMOR, a film by Kenji Mizoguchi, is about a woman who runs a geisha joint to provide her daughter with a better life. And in THE GODFATHER, Vito Corleone wanted something better for Michael. And even though Michael Corleone gets pulled into the criminal world, he strives to go ‘legitimate’ and keep the family together. These are stories about people who bargain with the devil to earn something better for themselves, but of course, it is never easy. Indeed, one of the critiques of capitalism by Marxists was that EVEN IF capitalism does produce lots of good things for humanity, its core dynamics is about ‘exploitation’ of alienated labor by the controllers of capital. Workers make goods in the material economy while the owners control the system via the money economy. In WOMAN IN THE RUMOR and THE GODFATHER, the tragic sense comes from the divide between the aspirations and the abjectness of reality. In contrast, when sane people survey the Age of Jewish Prophecy, they are bound to ask, "So, all of human history with all its strife, conflicts, tragedies, genius, vision, and search for redemption led to THIS? Really? A world where the globo-metropole, the US, defines itself with worship of homo-fecal-penetration and tranny-penis-cutting as ‘rainbow’ ecstasy, ‘twerking’ as a dance form, slut pride as ‘empowerment’, broken borders(called ‘open borders’) as national policy & moral urgency, grown women dye their hair blue or pink, parents & children pock themselves with tattoos(or body graffiti) & piercings, mindless morons pledge their allegiance to Israel while denying their own identity & history, white men cucking & white women going ‘jungloid’ with interracism with blacks, and etc? So, this is the grand culmination of the End of History? The Beginning of Degeneracy, Decadence as the New Sacredness — or ‘sacredence’ or excrement as new sacrament — , and mind-blowing hypocrisy of Mono-Nationalism where Jews and only Jews are deserving of everlasting identity and territory while all the world must open up to the poison fumes of globalist demographic replacement.
On some level, of course the Jews understand what is going on. They must, even though they express their elation and anxieties esoterically lest the goyim found out what is really happening. Remember how Zed reacted upon realizing that his kind has been fooled and manipulated by the Eternals in ZARDOZ? He lashed out in fury and swore to get revenge against the Eternals. The power doesn’t want us to know the truth, and so they prop up the Iconography and Narrative to toy with our emotions and senses. And they feed us the simpleminded zealotry of PC dogma to prevent us from thinking and asking the big questions. Our capacity for reason has been subsumed under the spell. And to break out of this spell, we need the secret decoder. We need to LEARN TO DECODE. This is why Jews now fear free speech and free inquiry. They demand that we accept that the ‘debate is over’ and leave it up to the Jews and ‘experts’ to tell us what is what. Our role is to believe, accept, and parrot. Whereas top Jews and smart white-cucks know what is really going on, the lesser Jews and the dimmer white cucks really do believe in the PC Narrative, dogma, and ‘idology’. Generally, the true believers, being less smart and aware, rarely have the dominant power, but there are times when they do gain control over certain key elite departments. (Second-rate zealots rose to prominence temporarily during the Cultural Revolution when chaos was the order of they day.) This becomes as problematic to Jews as to us folks. Obviously to us, these true-believing elites are dangerous and hostile. But they also pose a threat to Jewish power because they insist on purity of commitment. They don’t understand that Jews propped up PC as a controlling tool over goyim than as sincere set of universal values for all mankind. Also, being stupid, the true believers are pathetically unaware that PC, as currently constructed, is a betrayal of true universal values as it is less about same-rules-for-everyone than ‘idological’ favoritism of certain groups over others: Jews, Homos, and Blacks over everyone else. Because of their mania and stupidity, their handling of PC logic is almost like Dustin-Hoffman-as-Rain-Man trying to make sense of "Who’s on First", the famous Abbott & Costello shtick. They just don’t get it.
But Jews get it. Granted, not all Jews who get it feel the same way about it. While the majority of Jews-who-get-it are about using deception and manipulation to keep the Power, there are other kinds of Jews-who-get-it as well. Some Jews-who-get-it or JWGI have a certain sentimentality about goyim(especially non-whites) and feel rather bad about how smart Jews are using their money, muscle, and manipulation to hoodwink, exploit, and harm goyim, especially powerless ones like Palestinians. Philip Weiss and Norman Finkelstein are such Jews, and they tend to be on the Left. Then, even smaller in number are the Jews, usually on the Right, who believe that Jews should make peace with the world by recognizing the right of identity and territory for all peoples in exchange for the world’s recognition of Israel as a Jewish nation-state. THE VIRTUE OF NATIONALISM by Yoram Hazony is a good specimen of the position of these JWGI. Though smallest and weakest among Jews, at least in the diaspora, they are the most realistic and honorable because Poly-Nationalism is the best way for arranging & ruling societies and because these kinds of Jews have a sense of reciprocity: Gentile groups respect Jews, Jews respect gentile groups. And they are essentially Neo-Fascist in their balance of tradition of the ancients and the triumph of the modern.
But the kind of JWGI who have the real power are the quasi-satanic Jews. In a way, the overflow of Jewish Satanism is hardly surprising because intense power or force can do great good or great evil. It’s like fire can be used to maintain civilization or burn it down. It’s like nuclear energy can be used to light a city or blow it up. It’s like Negro vocality can be used spiritually to inspire folks or used savagely to rap about guns, ho’s, and blings. Greatness is never one-dimensional. Jews are a great people with remarkable intelligence, insight, and intensity of personality. For much of human history, Jewish intensity was contained and guided by the vision of God. Even though some may argue that Talmudism was a subconscious plot on the part of Jews to twist and turn Godliness to justify bad Jewish behavior, it too placed some brakes on what Jews could say or do. But with the fading of religion and then of universal idealism, Jewish intensity went in new directions. It could opt for modern tribalism of nationalism. It could opt for global hegemony via neo-imperialism masked with globo-homo. It could use its riches and privileges to indulge in bacchanalia, especially with Jewish men sticking their dongs into buxom blonde ‘shikses’ and Jewish women seeking out mandingos with mega-dongs. Without a moral and spiritual lid to control Jewish energies, they boiled over into all kinds of excesses. It went Portnoic, but then at least Philip Roth was serious and sincere enough of a writer to wrestle with this neurosis. He felt some degree of anxiety, shame, and confusion. But later generation of Jews grew up at ease with the perversion. They might call on friends to watch a porn video where Ron Jeremy is sucking his own dick, surely a long way from the world of BRIGHTON BEACH MEMOIRS. Over time, Jews came to stop worrying and learned to love the Portnoic Power. But, goyim underwent similar changes-of-hearts in the modern era. Consider the sense of self-doubt in the endings of Federico Fellini’s LA DOLCE VITA and Michelangelo Antonioni’s L’AVVENTURA. Or the philosophical angst of Ingmar Bergman films. Even though those film artists fully immersed themselves in modernity, they’d been raised in a world where the fear and shame of sin were still a factor. Even in their rejection of sin, the fact that they had to struggle against it was sure sign that it still animated their emotions and worldview. Anyway, whatever trepidation older generations of Jews may have felt about the times-they-are-a-changing, the New Jews since the rise of boomers have been utterly shameless and insane in their greed, lust, vanity, and pride... just like Jordan Belfort and crew in THE WOLF OF WALL STREET. Through these types, the intensity of Jewish energy has grown utterly satanic and demon-infested, all the more so because there’s something so perverse about Jews presenting themselves as the eternally holy Holocaust People, the moral inspiration for all of mankind, while indulging in the worst excesses and using their massive amounts of money, power, and influence to degrade, dissolve, or destroy so much of the world. Belfort rationalized his greed as payback for a Wasp country-club's discrimination against his grandfather. Jeffrey Epstein the sex fiend and pervert invoked 'antisemitism' when he became the suspect of a criminal investigation. The loathsome Michael Cohen repeated the canard about being the son of a 'Holocaust Survivor', a meaningless term as just about any Jew who lived in areas under Nazi Occupation can designate himself as one. Given that 75% of French Jews survived WWII, were they all Holocaust Survivors? The way Jews use the Holocaust like Portnoy uses a piece of liver in Philip Roth's novel, we must now deal with Holocaust Porn.
And yet, Polanski was serious enough as an artist to grapple with the problems of Jewish neurosis and power. Though 1968 saw the release of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY that mythologized the rebirth of ‘Aryan’ David Bowman as the Nietzschean super-wiseman, the other release, ROSEMARY’S BABY directed by Roman Polanski based on the novel of Jewish Ira Levin, was far more prophetic in the trajectory of power in the coming era: The rise of Faustian Jewish Power that not only made a pact with the Devil but became the Devil itself. The current Age of the Jewish Prophecy is the Luciferian Age of Satanism, all the more so because the sheer preponderance of evil has hypnotized people all over the world into celebrating decadence & degeneration as the new sacredness and holiness. Jewish Power became Porn-Nazism as the New Faith. Perhaps then, Kubrick’s final film of EYES WIDE SHUT(that flirts with satanic imagery) was an admittance, even if subconscious, of how Polanski had been a better prophet in his gleeful cynicism and perverse pessimism as the new opportunity of hope unfettered by any moral considerations.
In the modern world, Jews have tried to pass as ‘white’, but their identity is deeper & stranger than the generic blandness of whiteness would imply. (Granted, whiteness once had potent meaning and significance, but the combination of Anglo disdain of ‘odorous’ ethnic distinctness, American need for tolerance, Afro-seduction-and-domination over whites in sports & music, and Jewish defamation of whiteness via PC, whiteness now ranges from soulless statistical item to an object of opprobrium by all groups, not least by ‘good whites’ intoxicated with PC.) Then, it is somewhat fitting that the Semitic-looking son in HEREDITARY looks and feels apart from everyone else in the family. It’s as if we are looking through the eyes of Paimon and notice the kid's unmistakable and irrepressible Jewishness.
And even though the story is dominated by females, everyone and everything lead to the crowning of the Semitic-looking son as the latest manifestation of Paimon. Throughout the movie, we see ‘strong’ female characters. We hear something about the grandmother but nothing about the grandfather. Even though the father is a nice guy, it is the mother who emotionally dominates the household. And even though the younger sister is deformed and apparently partly retarded, she is the favorite of the mother. And when the sister dies in an accident, the mother befriends an old woman who introduces her to the ritual of seance to call upon dead spirits. It’s woman-woman-woman-woman, but in the end, all the demonic fury, hysteria, and violence lead to the calm and commanding ritual in a tree house where the son is anointed as the keeper of the throne. It could be Ari Aster’s esoteric or eso-expression of anxiety over feminism, especially among Jewish men, but also a kind of triumphal self-assurance that, in the end, when push comes to shove, the eternal energies of the Jew will lead to the realization that there can be no Jewish Power without Jewish kings. Also, by nature, women are designed to surrender to power, be it demonism or divinity, than take control of it. Feminism is self-contradictory because it is about empowerment of women in search of what makes her most happy, which is submission to the Man of Power. Notice that in the ending of THE WITCH, the girl offers her soul to the Male Devil because he promises her sexual delights. What makes a man most happy is to possess and hold the power. What makes a woman most happy is to be held by the power. And that is why the women-heavy world of HEREDITARY is doomed unless it finds a male to place on the throne. Now, given the toxic pervasiveness of anti-natural feminism in our culture, Ari Aster’s esoterics come in two layers. On the one hand, it is an exegesis on the strange contours of Jewish Power physics written in a language that is decipherable to Jews-who-get-it(JWGI) but will go over the head of most goyim. But there is also the element of anti-feminism that Aster had to tip-toe around lest he be denounced by the Bitchery as a ‘misogynist’. But all the Jewish boingers know what it’s really about. "It has to be the son." There is a hidden war between the Pud-centered Covenant and the Poon-centered or ‘Pooterin’ new covenant(or Cuntinant) that is quietly raging between Jewish men and Jewish women.
Anyway, here we are in the Age of Jewish Prophecy come true but in the worst way. A most extraordinary time, the first such in human history. While Jews had ups and downs all throughout history, they never inherited the world... that is until now, and they did so on the backs of Anglo-American achievement. Jews tamed the white horse, the strongest horse there is. As its rider, Jews can carry out globo–pogroms or ‘globogroms’ against any people. What Cossacks did to Jews in the Pale of Settlement was nothing compared to Zionist-supremacist ‘globogroms’ against the Arab and Muslim world. Cossacks killed at most thousands. Jewish Power killed millions.
The Jewish rider broke the spirit of the white horse with the burden of Holocaust Guilt. Jews also used the black whip of ‘white guilt’ about slavery. There has never been a time such as this. Since their emergence as a people & culture thousands of years ago, Jews believed that, one day, the time would come when they, as the blessed of God, would be the people around whom all of humanity would revolve. One could argue that with the rise of Christianity and Islam, the Jewish-conceived God did take over the world, but the actual power was with the gentiles, not with Jews who were deemed the Killers of Christ by the Christians. But in the 20th century, Jews not only suffered their worst calamity but reached their greatest heights with power of money and media. Jews gained control of the signals in a world where electricity became the lifeblood of the economy, information, and imagination. J-Ray(Jewish Ray) via screens big and small came to dominate our perceptions of the world. And because the US became the sole superpower after the end of the Cold War, Jews came to dominate all the world, not least because the EU and Japan are also essentially puppets of the US. While there are many nations with few or no Jews, the fact is only a few nations matter in dominating the world, and Jews control the biggest fish that control the big fishes that dominate over all other fishes.
But how long can this Jewish Hegemony last? Does it have the legitimacy to be worthy of lasting? Will the Paimonic Prophecy enter the dustbin of history a hundred years from now? Or will Jewish Evil rule the world in the coming centuries or even millennia. If the current prophecy fails, will Jewish Power have fallen forever, like Ancient Egypt or Classic Rome, or will it rise again as a redemptive power that rejects its Paimonic past or as an even more evil power? Will there be cohesive Jewish community in years to come, or will Jews be divided among various mixed-raced Jews(as the current rate of Jewish interracism is exceedingly high) — Jewish/Chinese, Jewish/black, Jewish/Latino, Jewish/Anglo, and etc? Future generations may also live under the power of satanic Jewish Prophecy, or Jewish world domination may just be a faint memory to them, in which case, people in the future will have little idea of what a blessing or curse it was for the 21st century to come under the might of Jewish Hegemony. Of course, it's possible that most of humanity will live(or 'sleep')through the Jewish Age of Prophecy unawares, and it's also possible that historians won't even write about it as a most worthy subject. Yuri Slezkine called the 20th century the "Jewish Century", but he was way too modest and he ain't seen nothing yet. Jews played an immense role in the 20th century but not the dominant role. That changed in the 21st century, the Age of Jewish Prophecy and Prosperity, or the Prosperity Prophecy of the Golden Calfers. And Century isn't enough for Jews, both the most ancient and most modern of all peoples. They want the Thousand Year Reichowicz. In the end, it seems Jews hate Hitler so much because he was not only onto them but wanted for his people what Jews were seeking for their own folks.